P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes

TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
P. O. Box 383 • Forsyth, Missouri 65653
Phone: 417 546-7225/ 7226 • Fax: 417546-6861
website: lJJJjJllJ.taneycounty.org

MINUTES
TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
MONDAY, APRIL 21, 2008, 7:00 P.M.
ASSOCIATE CIRCUIT COURT DIVISION II COURTROOM
TANEY COUNTY COURTHOUSE

Call to Order:
Chairman Sarah Klinefelter called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. A
quorum was established with nine members present. They were: Sarah
Klinefelter, Joey Staples, Jim Brawner, Craig Trotter, Frank Preston, Ray
Edwards, Randall Cummings, Shawn Pingleton, and Mark Blackwell. Staff
present: Eddie Coxie, Marla Pierce, Bonita Kissee, Dan Nosalek, Keith Crawford,
and Bob Paulson.

Mr. Coxie read a statement explaining the meeting procedures.

Review and Action:
Minutes, March 2008: With no additions or corrections a motion was made
by Ray Edwards to approve the minutes as written. Seconded by Jim Brawner.
The vote to approve was unanimous.

Final Votes:
Soup Shop: request by Stan Kolar to operate a small restaurant to be
open for breakfast, lunch and dinner located at 9383 St. Hwy. 76. Mr. Pingleton
discussed with staff parking requirements, and compliance letters from the fire
district, health department, MoDot and sewer district. Hours of operation will be
6:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. seven days a week. No alcohol will be served. After
discussion a motion was made by Joey Staples to approve based upon the
decision of record with the addition of compliance letter from the Health
Department and hours of operation. Seconded by Shawn Pingleton. The vote to
approve was unanimous.

Ron's Storage and Sales Lot: request by Ron Todd to store boat trailers on
property located at Paradise Lane. Mrs. Klinefelter clarified the request. Mr.
Todd addressed questions from the Commission regarding security which he
clarified he has a chain link fence on one side, but does not plan to put fencing
on the other three sides. Mr. Coxie pointed out that the decision of record states
that foliage or fencing must be between residential and commercial areas. Mr.
Todd reported that with the leaves out his property cannot be seen from the

1

I
 residences on the hill above. Mr. Brawner pointed out that at the public hearing
it was brought out that the property below can be seen. Mr. Todd admitted that
he has been storing trailers on other lots in the subdivision for three to four
years. Mr. Brawner pointed out the various numbers of trailers stored all across
the properties. Mr. Coxie reported that the reason for this is that the Planning
Department required Mr. Todd to move the amount of the trailers at one point
and he had to move them. Mrs. Klinefelter asked Mr. Todd if the covenants of
the subdivision did not allow storage of equipment, and he stated that they don't
address it. He would like to store other types of things on the property but boat
trailers are the most important. He would like to store approximately 100 trailers
on the property. Mr. Preston discussed compatibility to the residential
neighborhood. Mr. Todd stated that the residences also store their boat trailers
in their gated community. Mr. Brawner discussed the attitude of the Big Bear
property owners regarding this business and the Emerald Point property owners.
He wouldn't mind approval if Mr. Todd would keep it clean and neat. Mrs.
Klinefelter addressed changing the use of this site to commercial zoning. Mr.
Coxie discussed the requirements of the Code as it applies to this request. Mr.
Todd owns 30 lots in Arcadia Landing. Mr. Coxie stated that Mr. Todd can place
up to 2 trailers per lot. Mr. Pingleton discussed spreading out the trailers all over
or address this to just the property on this request. Mr. Paulson discussed setting
precedence. Mr. Edwards stated that the way the land lays makes it almost
impossible for Mr. Todd to comply. After discussion a motion was made by
Shawn Pingleton to deny. Seconded by Mark Blackwell. Jim Brawner abstained.
The vote to deny was unanimous.

Crossland Storage, LLC: request by Jim Schmig to construct additional
storage units at the existing site off St. Hwy. 76. Mrs. Klinefelter clarified the
request. After discussion a motion was made by Ray Edwards to approve based
upon the decision of record. Seconded by Mark Blackwell. Mr. Coxie stated that
the decision of record shall reflect the number of units and bUildings. The vote to
approve was unanimous.

Bee Creek Multi-Use Complex: request by Missouri Partners, Inc. to
develop a multi-use residential/commercial office complex located off Bee Creek
Road. Mrs. Klinefelter clarified the request. Eddie Wolfe representing the
developer addressed questions from the Commission. The height of the buildings
will not exceed the Code requirements. There is 58 total acres on this site. Mr.
Wolfe has met with the property owner who requires an easement through this
property and has no problems. After discussion a motion was made by Jim
Brawner to approve based upon the decision of record with the addition of an 8'
board fence next to residential property, with buffers around the rest and any
other structure other than office, commercial space or residential would come
before the Planning Commission for approval. Seconded by Randall Cummings.
The vote to approve was unanimous.

2
 Verizon Wireless SSL Tower: request by Buddy Roberts to allow Verizon
Wireless to place a communications tower on his property located off Coy
Boulevard. Mrs. Klinefelter clarified the request. Mr. Edwards discussed
disassembly if the tower ceases to be used. Mr. Roberts stated that stipulation is
in the contract. With no discussion a motion was made by Randall Cummings to
approve based upon the decision of record. Seconded by Ray Edwards. The vote
to approve was unanimous.

Addition of Well #6 and Storage Facility Tri-States Utilities: request by
Harold and Sharon Epps to place a storage facility and well house for Tri-Lakes
Utilities located off Skyview Dr. Mrs. Klinefelter clarified the request. Mr.
Brawner asked if this request did not receive approval what the alternatives
would be. Mrs. Epps stated that the alternative would be to find another piece of
property, and this is currently being done. She stated that this property is the
most economical place to position the structure. If the tank is built smaller or
shorter, it would be less cost effective to gravity flow the water. A separate
boosting pump operation would be installed which would have to run more at
the cost to the customers. Pressure is only a function of height according to the
engineer. Should a high demand situation occur, this would create an emergency
situation which the Department of Natural Resources would be called in. Mr.
Crawford asked if this tank is being put at the highest point on the property. The
engineer stated that by putting the tank on the highest point makes the cost less
to the provider because the tank will be shorter. The top of the tank will be
below the eye level of the surrounding property owners according to the
engineer. The diameter would be 45' for a million gallon tank. The nearest
residence is approximately 200' from the request. After discussion a motion was
made by Shawn Pingleton who stated that utilities are necessary, to approve
based upon the decision of record. Seconded by Craig Trotter. The vote to
approve was unanimous.

Highway 65 Multi-Use Complex at Emory Creek Ranch: request by
Missouri Partners, Inc. to develop a multi-use residentialjretailjall-purpose
entertainment complex at Emory Creek Road. Mrs. Klinefelter clarified the
request and summarized and discussed the concerns and issues as reported by
property owners to the Commission. Mr. Coxie read the request as presented by
the developer. Steve Redford the developer explained his plans and clarified the
race track portion of the request which will be a V2 mile track which can be used
for concerts, stock car racing, midget racing, bandit racing and any other event
that could be held at that type of area. The track would be open for the season
of the different types of uses. It will be made of dirt. Noise from the track can be
abated by the surface being lower than the St. Hwy. according to Mr. Redford.
Mr. Pingleton asked for a noise level study. Mr. Redford stated that the request
wasn't made to only have part of it approved, and pointed out that the request

3
 complies with the rules of the Code. Mr. Edwards asked if the track could be
switched with the pavilion possibly eliminating the noise. Mr. Redford stated that
he wants the track to be next to the highway making a visual impact. Mrs.
Klinefelter discussed with Mr. Redford water runoff. Mr. Redford stated that a
hydraulic study had been done of Emory Creek, capacities and 100 year
floodplain. Permits will be obtained from the Department of Natural Resources
which will require public hearings and review by them. Mr. Brawner discussed
elevation where the track is located. Mr. Redford stated that there will be a 60'
vertical cut between the track and adjoining use, and a 40' cut between the next
two uses. Mr. Crawford discussed with Mr. Redford about sound reinforcement
could be provided in and within the track helping with the noise reduction. Mrs.
Klinefelter discussed the paragraph on the proposed site plan. This is a common
verse to be place on a concept plan by architects. Mrs. Klinefelter discussed with
staff regarding each use coming back before the Commission. Mr. Paulson
advised that the applicant had presented a specific plan to them. Mr. Coxie
advised that the Commission could limit the approval of some of the proposed
uses as presented. Mr. Redford reported that he is in the final review before the
Dept. of Natural Resources for landgrading, and sewer treatment facility. The
Corps of Engineers will be applied to for a 404 permit. Mr. Redford stated that a
recharge facility would be placed for the lake which would prevent flowage
impediment from Emory Creek. If there was a dry spell, it might impede the
creek. Mr. Edwards asked which would be better, a sound barrier or to move the
track. Mr. Redford stated that a sound barrier would be better. Mr. Blackwell
asked about dust from the track and Mr. Redford stated that a permit should be
obtained from MoDot, and the track would be watered. Mr. Pingleton pointed out
that the height of the bUildings accede the height regulations of the current
Code. Mr. Paulson reported that if certain conditions are met commercial can
exceed the regulations. Mr. Preston reported that he had dealt with a similar
situation with a race track close to residential property, and that restrictions can
be placed on amount of use, and modifications can be made to type of vehicles
to be raced on the track. A sound study can be done reactive to the operation of
the track, open and/or open air arena. Mr. Brawner reported that the City of
Branson paid a fine regarding noise in their City Limits. Mr. Pingleton stated that
he did not feel he could make an informed decision based on the lack of
information regarding noise. Mr. Nosalek reported that some entities can impose
certain regulations on noise generation. Mr. Paulson asked how this type of
request could be regulated and enforced. Mrs. Klinefelter stated that the study
could be required after approval. Mr. Edwards would like to see a sound barrier
to cut down on noise and to remove the "catch all language" on the site plan.
Mr. Coxie suggested asking the developer not to deviate from the original
request. Mr. Wolfe stated that the paragraph is on all the site plans and for
concept use only for the protection of the architect. Mr. Brawner discussed
parades and the noise levels of those and possibly the City of Branson have had
noise studies done. After discussion Mr. Edwards made a motion based upon the

4

I
 decision of record with the addition of the placement of a sound barrier around
the race track and theatre, and any change in the development must be brought
before the Commission, research be presented by staff regarding noise levels.
With no second, Mr. Edwards withdrew his motion. Mr. Pingleton suggested the
developer meet with the County regarding studies on noise levels and supply a
report. Mr. Redford suggested looking at what other Counties do regarding the
noise levels. He offered to do a sound study and he would find the highest and
lowest and eight in between to present to the Commission. He pointed out the
various items at stake suggesting jobs, and revenue. He stated that he could do
the study in 30 days. He offered to give staff three items to research and would
cover the cost of the study with an acceptable consultant. Mr. Pingleton made a
motion to table the vote until the study is presented at the June 16, 2008
meeting with Mr. Redford presenting to staff 5 business days before the meeting.
Mark Blackwell seconded. The vote to table was unanimous.

Concepts:
Holiday Hills Condo Association: a request to construct an office/shop
building for the homeowners association located at Rockford Drive. Denise Bart
representing Holiday Hills explained the request. This will be proposed to be built
next to the old building, which will be 1800 sq. ft. and will house both uses.
Discussion followed. This project will proceed to public hearing next month.

Highway 248 Business Park: a request by Table Rock Inv. LLC to construct
a maintenance shop, retail office and warehouse located off Dawn Road. Eddie
Wolfe representing the applicant stated this is next to the Kirby Van Burch
Theatre. Mr. Wolfe discussed parking, uses of the shop, office and warehouse.
Access will come from both 248 and Dawn Road. Mr. Wolfe pointed out this
project could eventually be annexed into Branson. This project will proceed to
public hearing next month.

B.A. Guns: a request by Gene Meadows to operate a gun shop in the
existing structure presently being used as Meadows of Eden Reception and
Banquet Hall located on St. Hwy. 176. Mr. Meadows explained his plans and
stated that ATF has been contacted and must receive Planning approval before
receiving their permit. This request will be strictly sales. Receptions will still be
held in the hall as well as the gun shop which will be open at different times.
There are special requirements for storage of ammunition. ATF approval will be
included in the Decision of Record. This project will proceed to public hearing
next month.

165 Commercial: Eddie Wolfe representing the applicant reported that this
received approval before for this site; however the Code does not have a
provision to split commercial property without planning approval. This project will
proceed to public hearing next month.

5

I
 Emerald Pointe: a request by Emerald Pointe, LLC to plat 50 acres more or
less for 160 residential lots to become Phase 12 of the development located off
Mo. St. Hwy. 265 to Hill Haven Road. Bruce Menke representing the applicant
explained the request and addressed questions from the Commission. This
project will proceed to public hearing next month.

Combs-Redfern Apartments: a request by The Taney County Board for the
Developmentally Disabled to construct a 15 unit apartment building for adults
with developmental disabilities located at behind Tantone Industries. Max Lytle
explained the request and stated that these apartments will be for adults who
need round the clock support. Mr. Lytle pointed out where the access would be
and that it would not access the Spring Meadows Subdivision. Mr. Pingleton
asked for a more detailed site plan. This project will proceed to public hearing
next month.

Shawn Pingleton made a motion to extend the meeting past 9:30 p.m. Jim
Brawner seconded. The vote to extend the meeting was unanimous.

Walnut Hill Spirits (Bear Creek Spirits): a request by James D. Blansit to
operate a distilled spirits plant to produce fruit brandies from locally grown fruit.
The structure will be 1000 sq. ft. in size to be located off Day Road. Mr. Blansit
explained his request, how the brandies are made, and marketing plan. The TIB
will regulate this use. This structure is two stories; the second story is for
storage. Mr. Blansit presented a site map and stated that a mile away is a bed
and breakfast and V2 mile is Luper Construction, and his parents own and
operate a bakery nearby. Mr. Blansit reported that all the neighbors are
supportive. Mr. Coxie asked if the state looked at the tasting room would it
qualify under regulations "by the drink". Mr. Blansit stated that the samples are
not the drink size. Brandy is 40% alcohol. Mr. Pingleton asked if there would be
delivery trucks in and out. Mr. Blansit stated that it would only be a small
delivery truck about the size of UPS truck, during regular business hours not past
6:00 p.m. This project will proceed to public hearing next month.

Verizon Wireless: a request by KOMC-KRZK, LLC to allow Verizon Wireless
to construct a cell tower on property located 11307 US Hwy. 160 at Walnut
Shade. Arleta Davidson representing the applicant explained the request and
reported that this tower will be place right next to the existing tower because the
existing tower will not support the added appliances. Mr. Brawner discussed
Mono-Pine towers with the applicant. Further discussion followed. This project
will proceed to public hearing next month.

Old and New Business:

6

I
 Mr. Coxie reminded the Commission that at the last meeting they wanted
to think about if they would allow Anello Townhomes to bring another request
before them as Division III. Discussion followed regarding density and setting
precedence. Mr. Paulson discussed case law as it applied to this request. Staff
was instructed to tell Mr. Treat this would not be heard as proposed.

Gail Myer, Whisper Cove: Mr. Coxie reported discussion with Mr. Myer
regarding splitting the property already approved down the center with zero lot
line. Mr. Myer reported that in the subdivision there are 100 duplexes designed
as condos. If the property owner could have a zero lot line they could better
obtain a loan on the property. The Code does not address how to sell the condo
with the land. He stated that in doing this does not change the project. Rick Minx
a land use attorney for Mr. Myer who has studied the Code addressed this type
of use and that the Taney County Code does not include this use. He suggested
possibly Board of Adjustment, or a performance zoning issue as a pud, or change
the Code which would take time. Mrs. Klinefelter discussed where staff is in the
review of the Code. Mr. Preston reported that the staff is in the early stages of
Code review and that intent is not to change the basics of the Code. Discussion
followed. The Commission suggested Board of Adjustment, as hard ship and the
Code not proViding for whole ownership as alternatives to Mr. Myer.

Mr. Coxie reported on a meeting with the County Commission regarding
the height amendment. He presented the revised copy as requested by the
Commission. Mr. Nosalek pointed out the changes. Discussion followed with
James Strahan stating opposition to the amendment. He reported that Danny
Strahan was absent when the County Commission voted on and approved it to
be sent back to the Planning Commission. Mr. Strahan at the County Commission
meeting asked them to rescind their motion to approve this amendment. Both
Messers' Strahan feel this amendment falls under bUilding codes. Mr. Paulson
discussed bUilding codes as the state law addresses them. In Mr. Strahan's
opinion to allow this amendment would be to stymie growth in Taney County.
Mr. Strahan stated that he plans to ask the attorney general for his opinion if this
falls under building codes. Discussion followed. The Commission will review the
document and discuss it at the May public hearing under Old and New Business.

Mr. Preston announced that Eddie Coxie has received the title of Planning
Administrator by the County Commission as of last week.

Adjournment:
With no other business on the agenda for April 21, 2008 a motion was
made by Craig Trotter to adjourn. Seconded by Randall Cummings. The vote to
adjourn was unanimous. The meeting adjourned at 10:30 p.m.

7

I
 APPLICATION FOR CONCEPT
DIVISION III
TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
-
The Concept Application is for the use of the Planning Staff and Commission to
enable us to know the nature of the planned project. The official Division III
Application for permit will be filed along with everything needed to complete your
file, as listed on the Division III Procedure Checklist. Division III Applications:
$100.00, Special Use Applications: $25.00.

NAME OF
~ROJECT: UJtIdtbwer [tar/lfnj Uod?c <

NAME OF (l I .
II ' . I i""'I'
APPLICANT: ~ r CL '3 I'{ I L.K LX' u Ill) <':£M~--
(must be owner ofrecord) .....J
SIGNATURE
DATE:
nJd.- Q."", Q,,~
-yd:QDB
(must be owner ofree ')

MAILING
ADDRESS: I <DO Old Glorj Rd.
-
TELEPHONE
NUMBER: "1.!....:/:...L?~->L3;L31.J__!.-/"""'&::..:L/:'-"&,"'-----'- _
-
NAME OF REPRESENTATIVE: tor /a..- tYmIJt'll
-
TELEPHONE NUMBER (reo.):

ACCESS TO PROPERTY (street # and name): 160 old G/pry
_ C\[,l'v
Ifi #ttIJ.013 /rJ[)
, '-11 jl?/L # of Acres (or sq. ft. of lot size):
-
PARCEL #
-
SECTION: TOWNSHIP: RANGE:

rox d/sinc.-f q(. WX

Os- q,D- 3D-OOO -000 - OJ.D,OOO
 NAME OF SUBDIVISION (if applicable):
-
Lot # (if applicable) /3 BLOCK #
-
WITHIN 600' FROM THIS PROPERTY IS: (check all land uses that apply)

{lO§f;~ MULTI-FAMILY (jESIDEN-IT1i;9

AGRICULTURAL MULTI-USE MUNICIPALITY'
-
TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM:
-
CENTRAL TREATMENT PLANT
-
PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM:

c§AA0 COMMUNITY' WELL PRIVATE WELL

DOES THE PROPERTY LIE IN THE 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN?(Circie one)
YES_NO_

THIS REOUEST FALLS INTO ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING CATEGORIES:
-
RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL

C§iCIAL-V (§R)
Please give a description of your proposed project including all uses:
(IMPORTANT: Make this description as complete as possible as your
public notice will be based on the information provided here.)

J ttM/I/d /;h ~ /lS~ 'Ae- ~c )6 Ye /
Wildflower Learning Center
 APPLICATION FOR CONCEPT
DIVISION III
TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
-
The Concept Application is for the use of the Planning Staff and Commission to
enable us to know the nature of the planned project. The official Division III
Application for permit will be filed along with everything needed to complete your
file, as listed on the Division III Procedure Checklist. Division III Applications:
$100.00, Special Use Applications: $25.00.

NAME OF
PROJECT: !ranson 511211(,
NAME OF
APPLICANT: Gus 11 hi b-et:::,?--'
(must ffeowner ofrecord)

SIGNATURE"5 5S 44 D~
DATE: ~~__
(must be owner ofrefofd)

MAILING
ADDRESS: 2-55 tkhtIJorJ1e PI !fill luJu/lle? fYlo, (;, StzfR 'I
TELEPHONE
NUMBER: LjI7-4?1/-8't if
NAME OF REPRESENTATIVE: M;{;. 5'u t=tJql na b e ,

ACCESS TO PROPERTY (street # and name): #~v :2.'1K
# of Acres (or sq. ft. of lot size):
-
PARCEL # of-'3· 0-0]- 0 OO-C;f)O-ooL/, ()O 3 o'?-tf.O-/8'-o~o-o()O-t1ot/, !02-
-
SECTION: 7 TOWNSHIP: .23 RANGE: .2 /

I
 NAME OF SUBDIVISION (if applicable):
-
Lot # (if applicable) BLOCK #
-
WITHIN 600' FROM THIS PROPER1Y IS: (check all land uses that apply)

COMMERCIAL / MULTI-FAMILY / RESIDENTIAL

AGRICULTURAL V MULTI-USE MUNICIPALI1Y
-
1YPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM:
-
CENTRAL TREATMENT PLANT V INDIVIDUAL
-
PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM:

CENTRAL COMMUNI1Y WELL/ PRIVATE WELL
-
DOES THE PROPER1Y LIE IN THE 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN?(Circie one) /
YES_NO_V_

THIS REOUEST FALLS INTO ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING CATEGORIES:
-
RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY COMMERCIA INDUSTRIAL
-
SPECIAL-USE OTHER
-
Please give a description of your proposed project including all uses:
(IMPORTANT: Make this description as complete as possible as your
public notice will be based on the information provided here.)

Sfl;±-ptofedy ;0+0 ~.L.ot;;1 an ML;s £"isf/r
5for-0.4.e 1L/\;+S a.nJ Lot I dae~n'+ hq iJe anI) /,.rlllCbvefVlrYlt-..J
Q r I
12h ;.f I

I
 BRAN$ON {fTORAdE
'" ""'"

J
'mz~
i st'c ~""/-
T. rzJN. RZtt

""""""'"
A mACrCFUM).91Uo\rrlI IN THE: 51/2 CFLDT 2 F'RA/:.11CNN. stl'~or SfX~ 7; ~ THCI(fI2 CFLOr z or

~~l rg:: ~4,.~~:~AS~~~~,"fFC::J:!'i~~a:::u~
1HC SOl/lMl£Sr 0JIl¥R or M: $1/2 !.Dr Z OF 1HC F'RA/:.IICWAL Sltf/4 OF SAO SfX1ION ~ 11D«:C It OOT/OW It
1#fro~=-~CF~~T~~~~p~7.J.,;r~~
, fIJQ(T-!JF'-WA,Y LH CF"flSJUl. 12" AS FIJU.* 1HDfC£ ~r N.afC A~rANCDfT '6.0167 DOMl"
SUIIbrT ()F A cun£ TO 1HC flJQ(T 110." F'EE1 (SUI scd/o(T HAtoH;: A CHORD B£4R1HC JtM1lJtSTJJtCE or
S N1Jt'ItI' £. IOJT frET,w, HA ..... A 1WJtIJS or :RJtU1l FrE1]: 1HCNCC S 20'0ttt.' C A DtSTNfC£ cr t4Z.SS
, nn: 1HENC£ SlllI1P£.4S'IOlLY M.C!Hf; A ,..uog DCCRU: cutlC ltl 1HC I.OT tI',t4 Ftrf ($ACl CU'hC Kot~ A
, ItAlXl$ cr IIO.lU 1IZ1} 1HDICC S JiJW6I5" C. A lJI$TANCC or ~4$1'U1: 1HENC£ $ClV1N['AS1DII.r ALOJIf; A

~~m~:~f'~~ArU::::1fs.~D.~~~r,::[.!'f~Il7U
l:I('CIIl[£ sccJ.b(r or A cut\£ 11) 1HC R1CHT tPa.2t} FrET ($M:l SRllt:/rtr ~1lHC A aKJRD I!JCNtJN(; AWJ DISTANCe
ar s S71''ttl' It: '",Of F'EE1 AM) HA~ A ftADftIS or I17a.OO f1ITJ: 1HDKt: It "n;n,,- It: A DtS1JJtCC OF J7.4f
~ 1HCNC£ If 4TQ%'4lI" Co A DISTANCE or fdOlJ nn: 11DK:£ If .JlI''5T.fD"" If: A rxsTAHa OF 111.10 F'tET;
rHOfC£ $ D"3IflJr t A DtSTAifCC (T "7.2C F£ET: 1HCNCC S lJ9W'og- II: II DISTANCE OF tS<146 nn; 1'0 THe
I«IRTHEAST e:t:IRNCR OF THe N£t/4 or 11£ N£1/f OF secTION f:J. rr:J1rNSHIP fa NORTH. R.WOE D lKST; ~
~~r 10DtJt.~::~flE~r::l~kCCvw~ CCHT-WNC :1# Aai'a OF LAND. OR

A SUlf'£ CASEJ.kNr L'IWO 01E'f All' ACIlOSS A PAAr OF 1HC $1;2 OF un 2 FR/ol;1'IdW. SJt1/4 OF SCCTIao/ 7. AN'
1HC /(1/2 OF Lor 2 OF 1HC F1W:TIOHAL J('fI(I/4 OF sccnoi( fA ALL B£N; IN 1f}ffH5HP 2:1 I«JRTH. fW«;C 2f lIO"T.
T~ axMtY. ~ 8£JH1; IIoRc PAR~'" DCSCSI18CD AS FlJU.Olts' B£C:/INNC AT ~ DtIflWI; 5;!'" tI«M
PtN IIItR1aNC 1HC swrHIICST CC1tJO (;IF 1HC 51/2 Lor 2 or THe F1W:7/ONAL SItf/4 OF SAO scr:OON 7: ~
S OOT1f'6,' £ JLOIfI; 1HC rlGr LH OF TI£ NI/2 OF UH Z OF K fMClIOHAL NI#/4 OF SCCOON Ia. A DlSrANCe
OF Q.66 nET: 1HDfCC N UU'''''" C LLAVf«; SoUl IIcsr ac A lJIS1NICE OF 4O.l..2::l' nrr.
rolf A H£W I'CWr OF
~ JH:NC£ NOIf7H/la1l1'lf.r ALOI(C A NOH-TANODff 11.107:2 D£QIIa" aAIfK" 111 lHr RIOHT I:5..M I't!T ($All
cunc HA_ A QK1IfD B£M1NC JH) lJiST/tJfC£ OF If 46'58'/1'" It ot5.001 n:cr. /tJD HAitll'C A IW»J$ or.u.tfof
~~~:=~r:;.rJ:~~~~~r=r~':rA
L*E or IiSJUJ. p~ AS ftJU.DftS 1HDiCC s .utlOM"' £ A DtSrANCe or ZllJ.64 nET: 1HDiCC SCllJlJ£U1DILr
~~LLAOC:::~~T~:r~~HA=~~Mf1:xxrFtrTf.:a
DWla'.so::I.bir OF' A cunc 10 1HC ftII:HT 14M IfEr (SA» so::rl.i::NT HAIN:" A O#CIIID IJCNfItII; AN) ~ OF'
s :I:r34"3t1" It 14M nrr AND HAII'I'C A .tADItlS or 1fJfI.(J{J nz7,l 10 THe ¥'fir 1"CHT OF' ~ c.udobtr

\
CO/(TItIfIfG .112U(J{J SOl.WI£ Fr£T or LAJA IIal£ O't un

\
\

~._.\
""",,u'
LINE TABLE

L-19T.14' \
,

\

LOT 2
=1.66 ACRE;f

-~-«iG'------

.-mr
R-I/75.00'
L_fft..1'5"
QC:l. MNC.-S snl'1~ It
S 1174$'2$" C aD. /JfST._In.DI"
1"'.01' '. fll12"

GRAPHIC! {jC!ALE
..... ~r--,..;j~1
~
( D(P'EIT )
Ib>otl-eo It.
 Branson Storage

_-----..-
..,---- ..
........ eo..e, .....-.
-.,.--..-
....nos_.__... it'_-...,..
....-n._...--..._
........--.- . _-....,_
.........-.-.-.......,.--
~_

_ n-c....,_ ---... _
.. ~ _ ..... _"' o.. n- __
.~
_
ioIfIiod-"'~"'-"
_
_ n.....---....,
.....0-. .....
IIiooIl ... O" • ."...,_ el

--.~-....­
W."..
 O~-35
APPLICATION FOR CONCEPT
DIVISION III
TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
-
The Concept Application is for the use of the Planning Staff and Commission to
enable us to know the nature of the planned project. The official Division III
Application for permit will be filed along with everything needed to complete your
file, as listed on the Division III Procedure Checklist. Division III Applications:
$100.00, Special Use Applications: $25.00.

NAME OF L J '/)
PROJECT: S+om W~YJ J!operV6 0le-
~:~~g:NT: Jexv,/ L. 5lUVYlbqUgf-v (~fatr1ha(jcIJ Hopzr/76, LLc)
(7 b: owner ~f retard) J

,,
~, !
i
(must be owner ofrecord)

-
TELEPHONE ~
NUMBER: [~l 0 I ')77. qs-~ I
NAME OF REPRESENTATIVE: Cyt rol4V\ ffl/td+ - 9-o.w7/!J{'{Uj,-~_
MAILING ADDRESS (rep.): 5~O'1-- (oy. (Uh OntrC Har(tScn, A12- 1Z{,r)(
TELEPHONE NUMBER (reo. ): ~ 70 ~ L( {v - J'5IJk
ACCESS TO PROPERTY (street # and name): I~q &sfoh UrV'C-
q5 Ii- /;;;1, 5 # of Acres (or sq. ft. of lot size):

PARCEL # JO-3.0- 07 -@03 -005- D05000
-
SECTION: TOWNSHIP: RANGE:

I
 ,-"NA,-"M...!..!E~O""F,-S""U"-,B",Dc:.;IV.....IS",,I=O-,-,-N......i,,-f""a=""-""""-J-'---'--"'-"a'-='-U--'-'nO"'-f)-'-----C-"-""-'-''----'-=''-'-..:~,__>~'ZL7ft5
I/a.vadlse
Lot # (if applicable) 53 BLOCK # 5"6. LJI littJe:.
-
WITHIN 600' FROM THIS PROPERTY IS: (check all land uses that apply)

COMMERCIAL MULTI-FAMILY G£SIDEN~
-
AGRICULTURAL MULTI-USE
---
MUNICIPALI1Y
------
-
TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM:
-
CENTRAL TREATMENT PLANT
-
PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM:

CENTRAL @0MUNI1Y W~ PRIVATE WELL

DOES THE PROPERTY LIE IN THE 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN?(Circie one) J
YES_NOlL

THIS REOUEST FALLS INTO ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING CATEGORIES:
-
RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL

OTHER

I
 Stambaugh Properties LLC

_-----.......-.,.
... tNt_.,..,.,...,... ......
.._
-----
....,~-.....,._ ..--..-
"..,...,.

...........
. _-...-. ~ ...-r

..........--..........,----
~

"' ...._ _ w _ _ ............
_ _ n.c.....y._",,---.. _ _
-.....".

. . . . . . . . . . . . . _01 . . 0 . 1_ . . . .
ftIp5od el~ ... "'-br
........._ n . . _ _ ~­
-......
..... 0..._• ........,_.....
..... o...~ ..'"'"..
---.c..<:on_ _"'-
~-
"-.
 APPLICATION FOR CONCEPT 6S- 31.0
DIVISION III
TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION

The Concept Application is for the use of the Planning Staff and Commission to
enable us to know the nature of the planned project. The official Division III
Application for permit will be filed along with everything needed to complete your
file, as listed on the Division III Procedure Checklist. Division III Applications:
$100.00, Special Use Applications: $25.00. .

NAME OF
PROJECT: Addition to Forest Lake at StoneBridge Village
-
NAME OF
APPLICANT: Missouri Partners, Inc.
V (must be owner ofrecord)

SIGNATURE ~.t2eR.. ---
DATE: 4-29-08
(must be owner ofrecord)

MAILING
ADDRESS: 800 State Highway 248, Bldg III, Branson, MO 65616
-
TELEPHONE
NUMBER: (417) 336-8798

NAME OF REPRESENTATIVE: Wolfe Surveying
-
MAILING ADDRESS (rep.): 800 State Highway 248, Bldg IV, Ste D, Branson, MO 65616

TELEPHONE NUIVIBER (rep.): (417) 334-8820
-
ACCESS TO PROPERTY (street # and name): Limestone Drive
:::::115 AC in Taney Co &
# of Acres (or sq. ft. of lot size)~200 AC in Stone Co.
- 07-5.0-15-000-000-002.00 I, 07-5.0-15-000-000-004.000,
PARCEL # 07-5.0-15-000-000-006.000. 07-5.0-15-000-000-016.002
-
SECTION: 15 TOWNSHIP: 23N RANGE: 22W

I
 NAt'lE OF SUBDIVISION (if applicable): Addition to Forest Lake at StoneBridge Village
-
Lot # (if applicable) NA BLOCK #
-
WITHIN 600' FRat·'1 THIS PROPERTY IS: (check all land uses that apply)

COM Iv1ERCIAL X t"1ULTI-FAt'lILY X RESIDENTIAL X

AGRICULTURAL X MULTI-USE ,"1UNICIPALITY

TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEt'1:
-
CENTRAL X TREAmENT PLANT INDIVIDUAL

PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEfVJ:

CENTRAL X COMI'J1UNITY WELL PRIVATE WELL
-
DOES THE PROPERTY LIE IN THE 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN?(Circie one)
YES_NO..x..

THIS REQUEST FALLS INTO ONE OR IVJORE OF THE FOLLOWING CATEGORIES:

RESIDENTIAL X f\1ULTI-FAMILY COMIVIERCIAL X INDUSTRIAL

SPECIAL-USE OTHER
-
Please give a description of your proposed project including all uses:
(IMPORTANT: Make this description as complete as possible as your
public notice will be based on the information provided here.)

Uses proposed include single-family home lots, cabins and golf course addition with a

halfway house. The proposed subdivision will be an addition to Forest Lake at

StoneBridge Village and is split by Taney &Stone counties. The subdivision will

consist of approximately 324 single-family lots C189/Taney & 135/Stone), 284

condominium cabins (all in Stone), 2.5 acres for a halfway house with snackbar services

(located in Stone) for the 80-acre 9-hole golf course addition that includes an additional

12.70 acres for nonc!s.

I
~I
~,!

111
I,

I
I

.~ 11
•1 f
!
 Addition to Forest Lake at StoneBridge Village

_-
....,e-..v.._
.... ......... . . .'Y_ ..

--
p'0<l<>0_~

_~~~­

" , . , _.. pmW:tod.........._..-ry-
"'_,.-01,.,....".;_..
~Tho_ ... _ ....... .,.,.,.._.
~--.-...-­
.... "" .... ...
__ llweour.v"'_.... _ ....... __
_-~ .... '"
«"""'
0npMd--"'""' ~
I""'o....n-
_ ........
"p;wlit>.M_n.~-.........
..,... ... _ ..... o-.,itlclu6I1j ....
.....
.... t>eOoAiII~_iIIina<:>or-.t_oI
~.~and--'

~-

I
 21/MAR/2008/FRI 12:06 PM CAROL JONES REALTORS FAX No. 417 334 0005 P. 002
Mar 21 08 12:46p don ~ barbara brezavar 417 334 4835 p.1
21/MAR/2008/FRI 11:39 AM CAROL JONES REALTORS FAX No. 41 7 334 0005 P 002
.
i 0· ?'1 i-,........h·
(~. J~.
"'.

4--30-0f: .

APPLICATION FOR CONCEPT
DIVISION III
TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION

The Concept Application is fOJ" the use of the PlannIng Staff and Commission to
enable us to know the nature of the planned project. l11e offiaal Dlvlslorr ill
ApPlication for permit will be filed aIOOg with everything needed to complete your
file, as Iisl:ed on the Division III Procedure Checklist. Pivision ill Applications:
$100.00, Spedal Use Applications: $25.00.

NAME OF
PROJECT:.(
'K11 f' PP..opz;wed-
kL
.

PARCEL#ot -4'0 -2e> -000 - 0 0 0 ~oef9. 601
SECTION:,po TQWNSl1IP; J-8 Ai RANGE: J..I

I
21/MAR/2008/FRJ 12:06 PM CAROL JONES REALTORS FAX No. 417 334 0005 P 003

NAME OF SUBDMSION CifapplicabJe):
-
Lot # (if applicable) BLOCK #

WITHIN 600' FRQM THIS PROPERlY IS: (chedc all land uses that <molY)

(COMMERCIAb) (MULU-FAMIij) RESIDENTIAL

AGRICULTURAL (MULu-u:;;D MUNIOPALI1Y
-
lYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM:
-
CENTRAL TREATMENI PlANT
-
PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM:

~NT~;Z:; ~ COMMUNI1Y WELL PRIVATE WELL

DOES THE PROPERlY LIE IN THE 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN?(Circle one) V'"
YES_NO_'_

THIS REQUEST FALLS INTO ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING CATEGORIES:
-
. RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY COMMEROAL INDUSTRIAl

Please give a description of your proposed project illduding all uses:
(IMPORTANT: Make this description as complete as possible as your
public notice will be based on the information provided here.)
1 / /5 0(.//1.- /,Il/rz';:)Vr 7D ,,{c/'£0 ;4 IJAs~4'Aft/c­
~ [) .IJ'U;t1 /l ~ 1!'.G:.-.4"N1C::N f)
ifNi ;::O,£- r/Ur/A:7'~ {)S~ . . ( ~1'Yf'
TD !ff//t-P (1M~U<;t<.- ,'/Ie-nee fO.....- t)c);L HA7,</
(l, /'1. fJAt./1 s:; 1-rtH-AN1J rf ~ M () ~ I..t Ct lIT ail--(~,("L
{JrH~ S;:'/f-C-€ H.,... k,vy- Wir1f s~ w.4:tt? .J!r=S$ Ar~'

).fo /'~Tl!t..- S'",..,~ wd{ ,#C /Xl/ t--c. we- /.J/I/f ;!,JILQ
U '1 1'-1 (11:" F//v /<'/'f?rVcr' 0v7 ~ i'> T7",vt, &lJ::Mi'/./G, dt,; D
~- L),"- ? 0/L-S V IJ "tt 0 r-P'l c e; S p/'t;:c£
Ll/MAKILUU~/~KI !Z:Ub PM CAROL JONES REALTORS FAX No. 417 334 0005 P 004
 RKC Properties

I