P&Z Public Meeting Packet

T a n e y C o u n t y P l a n n in g C o m m is s io n
P. O. Box 383 • Forsyth, Missouri 65653
Phone: 417 546-7225 / 7226 • Fax: 417 546-6861
website: www.taneyeounty.org

AGENDA
TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
PUBLIC HEARING
MONDAY, MARCH 13, 2017, 6:00 P.M.
COUNTY COMMISSION HEARING ROOM
TANEY COUNTY COURTHOUSE

Call to Order:
Establishment o f Quorum
Explanation o f Meeting Procedures
Presentation o f Exhibits

Final Vote:
177 N. Tuscany Nightly Rental #17-1

Public Hearings:
167 N. Tuscany Nightly Rental #16-32
National Enzyme #17-4
764 Jones Road Nightly Rental #17-5
.127 N. Tuscany Nightly Rental #17-6

Old and New Business:
Tentative

Adjournment.
TANEY T a n e y C o u n t y P l a n n in g C o m m is s io n
P. O. Box 383 • Forsyth, Missouri 65653
Phone: 417 546-7225 / 7226 • Fax:417546-6861
'c o u n t y website: www. taneycounty. org

TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
DIVISION III SPECIAL USE PERMIT
167 N. TUSCANY DRIVE VACATION RENTAL

Hearing Date: March 13, 2017
Case #: 2016-0032
Applicant: Hill Property Investments, LLC
Representative: Richard T. Carraway

Request: The representative, Richard T. Carraway is seeking the Planning Commission
approval of a Division III Special-Use Permit allowing for the nightly rental of the
existing single-family residence. The residence contains three (3) bedrooms.

Background and Site History: Per the Assessor's information the single-family residence
was constructed in 2006. The single-family residence is held in condo style ownership at
the Villas of Fieldstone at Branson Creek Development.

The current application was approved for Concept February 21, 2017.

The Taney County Development Guidance Code defines nightly rental as "A residential
building, structure, or part thereof that may be rented for any period of time less than
thirty (30) calendar days, counting portions of days as full days." Therefore, the
applicant would have the ability to rent the residence for a period of thirty (30) days or
greater.

The exterior appearance of the single-family residence will remain the same. Per the
nightly rental provisions of the Development Guidance Code, "The maximum occupancy
for a nightly rental shall be two (2) persons per dwelling unit, plus two (2) persons per
bedroom." Therefore, the three (3) bedroom home would have a maximum occupancy
of eight (8) people.

Review: The property is currently served by an existing drive off North Tuscany Drive.

Per the nightly rental provisions of the Development Guidance Code, "One (1) off-street
parking space shall be provided for each two (2) persons of occupancy in a nightly
Rental." Therefore a total of four (4) parking spaces will be required. The project
received a total score of -1 on the Policy Checklist, out of a maximum possible score of
29.
Staff Recommendations: If the Taney County Planning Commission approves Division
III Permit #2016-0032, the following requirements shall apply, unless revised by the
Planning Commission:

1. Compliance with the provisions of the Taney County Development Guidance
Code.

2. Compliance letters from the Western Taney County Fire Protection District, the
Missouri Department of Revenue and the Environmental Division of the Planning
Department; including all other entities which have requirements governing a
development of this nature shall be provided to the Planning Department office.
(Chapter VI-VII).

3. A valid Missouri Department of Revenue Sales Tax License shall be provided to
the Planning Department prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Compliance.

4. No outside storage of equipment or solid waste materials.

5. This decision is subject to all existing easements.

6. The residence located at 167 N. Tuscany Drive shall accommodate (sleep) no
more than the Maximum Occupancy. "The maximum occupancy for a nightly
rental shall be two (2) persons per dwelling unit, plus two (2) persons per
bedroom". The total occupancy may be further limited based upon the provisions
of the Western Taney County Fire Protection District requirements and
regulations.

7. The 167 N. Tuscany Dr. Vacation Rental has been approved as a Special-Use
Permit. Therefore the permit is specific to the representative to whom the permit
is issued and cannot be transferred without Planning Commission approval. The
Special-Use Permit shall not be used to establish commercial compatibility for or
with any future land-use change applications.

8. This Decision of Record shall be filed with the Taney County Recorder of Deeds
Office within 120 days or the approval shall expire (Chapter II Item 6).
 N

167 N Tuscany Dr Nightly Rental
 T a n e y C o u n t y P l a n n in g C o m m is s io n
P. O. Box 383 * Forsyth, Missouri 65653
Phone: 417 546-7225 / 7226 • Fax:417546-6861
website: www.taneycounty.org

TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
DIVISION III STAFF REPORT
MARCH 13, 2017
LORETTA RENEE PENNEL
NATIONAL ENZYME CO.
#17-4

The representative, National Enzyme Co. is seeking the Planning Commission approval
of a Division III Permit allowing for the future expansion of the National Enzyme Co.
manufacturing facilities located on the adjacent property to the east.

The current application was approved for Concept February 21, 2017. Per the
Assessor's information the property consists of lots 1-4 of the South Park Village
Subdivision platted and recorded in 1981. The total of the 4 lots is approximately 4
acres. Taney County Regional Sewer District in combination with National Enzyme Co.
have expanded the central sewer to the adjacent property which is currently part of the
National Enzyme Co. manufacturing business.

The project received a total score of 3 on the Policy Checklist, out of a maximum
possible score of 29.

If the Taney County Planning Commission approves Division III Permit #2017-0004, the
following requirements shall apply, unless revised by the Planning Commission:

1. Compliance with the provisions of the Taney County Development Guidance
Code.

2. Compliance letters from the Central Taney County Fire Protection District
including all other entities which have requirements governing a development of
this nature shall be provided to the Planning Department office, (Chapter VI-VII).

3. Division II Permits will be required for any construction that meets the
requirements for such.

4. This decision is subject to all existing easements.

5. This Decision of Record shall be filed with the Taney County Recorder of Deeds
Office within 120 days or the approval shall expire (Chapter II Item 6).
 IN

National Enzyme Co.
! 10473

10453

.AUSTIN S'

10204
^ B e a c o n Taney County, MO

Overview

Legend
A ustin
I I P arcels

Roads

Lakes

□ C o rp o ra te Limits

Date created: 3/2/2017
Last Data Uploaded: 5/20/2013 10:17:09 P M

^ ^ D eveloped by
Schneider ^*e Schneider C orp oration
TANEY T a n e y C o u n t y P l a n n in g C o m m is s io n
P. O. Box 383 • Forsyth, Missouri 65653
Phone: 417 546-7225 / 7226 • Fax:417546-6861
COUNTY website: www.taneycounty.org

TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
DIVISION III SPECIAL USE PERMIT
764 JONES ROAD VACATION RENTAL

Hearing Date: March 13, 2017
Case #: 2017-5
Applicant: GCS Properties, LLC
Representative: Gary McSpadden

Request: The representative, Gary McSpadden is seeking the Planning Commission
approval of a Division III Special-Use Permit allowing for the nightly rental of a planned
three (3) bedroom main residence with an attached two (2) bedroom guest house. The
total number of bedrooms will be five (5).

Background and Site History: Per the Assessor's information the property is 2.13 acres
in size. The applicant is planning to build a three (3) bedroom main home with a two
(2) bedroom guest house attached by a covered walkway between the homes. The
property is served by a well on the property. Taney County Planning staff is currently
working with a licensed installer for the permit on the onsite waste water system that
will be sized for 840 gpd based on the maximum occupancy of 14 people. The onsite
waste water permit will be required to be in place before any building permit is issued.

The current application was approved for Concept February 21, 2017.

The Taney County Development Guidance Code defines nightly rental as "A residential
building, structure, or part thereof that may be rented for any period of time less than
thirty (30) calendar days, counting portions of days as full days." Therefore, the
applicant would have the ability to rent the residence for a period of thirty (30) days or
greater.

The exterior appearance of the single-family residence will remain the same. Per the
nightly rental provisions of the Development Guidance Code, "The maximum occupancy
for a nightly rental shall be two (2) persons per dwelling unit, plus two (2) persons per
bedroom." Therefore, the three (3) bedroom home would have a maximum occupancy
of eight (8) people and the two (2) bedroom guest house would have a maximum
occupancy of six (6) people.

Review: The property is currently served by an existing drive off Jones Road.
Per the nightly rental provisions of the Development Guidance Code, "One (1) off-street
parking space shall be provided for each two (2) persons of occupancy in a nightly
Rental." Therefore a total of seven (7) parking spaces will be required. The project
received a total score of 2 on the Policy Checklist, out of a maximum possible score of
29.

Staff Recommendations: If the Taney County Planning Commission approves Division
III Permit #2017-0005, the following requirements shall apply, unless revised by the
Planning Commission:

1. Compliance with the provisions of the Taney County Development Guidance
Code.

2. Compliance letters from the Western Taney County Fire Protection District, the
Missouri Department of Revenue and the Environmental Division of the Planning
Department; including all other entities which have requirements governing a
development of this nature shall be provided to the Planning Department office.
(Chapter VI-VII).

3. A valid Missouri Department of Revenue Sales Tax License shall be provided to
the Planning Department prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Compliance.

4. No outside storage of equipment or solid waste materials.

5. This decision is subject to all existing easements.

6. The residence located at 764 Jones Road shall accommodate (sleep) no more
than the Maximum Occupancy. "The maximum occupancy for a nightly rental
shall be two (2) persons per dwelling unit, plus two (2) persons per bedroom".
The total occupancy may be further limited based upon the provisions of the
Western Taney County Fire Protection District requirements and regulations.

7. The 764 Jones Road Vacation Rental has been approved as a Special-Use Permit.
Therefore the permit is specific to the representative to whom the permit is
issued and cannot be transferred without Planning Commission approval. The
Special-Use Permit shall not be used to establish commercial compatibility for or
with any future land-use change applications.

8. This Decision of Record shall be filed with the Taney County Recorder of Deeds
Office within 120 days or the approval shall expire (Chapter II Item 6).
 f-^Beaco D Taney County, MO
Overview

Legend
Parcels

Roads

■ Lakes

I I C orporate Limits

Date created: 1/31/2017
Last Data Uploaded: 5/20/2013 10:17:09 PM

Developed by
The S chn eid er C o rp o ra tio n
Schneider
TANEY T a n e y C o u n t y P l a n n in g C o m m is s io n
P. O. Box 383 • Forsyth, Missouri 65653
'COUNTY Phone: 417 546-7225 / 7226 • Fax: 417546-6861
website: www.tcmeycounty.org

TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
DIVISION III SPECIAL USE PERMIT
127 N. TUSCANY DRIVE VACATION RENTAL

Hearing Date: March 13, 2017
Case #: 2017-0006
Applicant: Roy and Jane Glazer
Representative: same

Request: The representatives Roy and Jane Glazer are seeking the Planning
Commission approval of a Division III Special-Use Permit allowing for the nightly rental
of the existing single-family residence. The residence contains three (3) bedrooms.

Background and Site History: Per the Assessor's information the single-family residence
was constructed in 2007. The single-family residence is held in condo style ownership at
the Villas of Fieldstone at Branson Creek Development.

The current application was approved for Concept February 21, 2017.

The Taney County Development Guidance Code defines nightly rental as "A residential
building, structure, or part thereof that may be rented for any period of time less than
thirty (30) calendar days, counting portions of days as full days." Therefore, the
applicant would have the ability to rent the residence for a period of thirty (30) days or
greater.

The exterior appearance of the single-family residence will remain the same. Per the
nightly rental provisions of the Development Guidance Code, "The maximum occupancy
for a nightly rental shall be two (2) persons per dwelling unit, plus two (2) persons per
bedroom." Therefore, the three (3) bedroom home would have a maximum occupancy
of eight (8) people.

Review: The property is currently served by an existing drive off North Tuscany Drive.

Per the nightly rental provisions of the Development Guidance Code, "One (1) off-street
parking space shall be provided for each two (2) persons of occupancy in a nightly
Rental." Therefore a total of four (4) parking spaces will be required. The project
received a total score of -1 on the Policy Checklist, out of a maximum possible score of
29.
Staff Recommendations: If the Taney County Planning Commission approves Division
III Permit #2017-0006, the following requirements shall apply, unless revised by the
Planning Commission:

1. Compliance with the provisions of the Taney County Development Guidance
Code.

2. Compliance letters from the Western Taney County Fire Protection District, the
Missouri Department of Revenue and the Environmental Division of the Planning
Department; including all other entities which have requirements governing a
development of this nature shall be provided to the Planning Department office.
(Chapter VI-VII).

3. A valid Missouri Department of Revenue Sales Tax License shall be provided to
the Planning Department prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Compliance.

4. No outside storage of equipment or solid waste materials.

5. This decision is subject to all existing easements.

6. The residence located at 127 N. Tuscany Drive shall accommodate (sleep) no
more than the Maximum Occupancy. "The maximum occupancy for a nightly
rental shall be two (2) persons per dwelling unit, plus two (2) persons per
bedroom". The total occupancy may be further limited based upon the provisions
of the Western Taney County Fire Protection District requirements and
regulations.

7. The 127 N. Tuscany Dr. Vacation Rental has been approved as a Special-Use
Permit. Therefore the permit is specific to the representative to whom the permit
is issued and cannot be transferred without Planning Commission approval. The
Special-Use Permit shall not be used to establish commercial compatibility for or
with any future land-use change applications.

8. This Decision of Record shall be filed with the Taney County Recorder of Deeds
Office within 120 days or the approval shall expire (Chapter II Item 6).
 IN

127 N Tuscany Nightly Rental

_____ _
Bonita Kissee

From: Lisa Aguirre [hollisterladyquilts@ gm aii.com ]
Sent: W ednesday, February 22, 2017 11:36 AM
To: Bonita Kissee
Subject: Fwd: Planning C om m ission

Lisa A g u irre
210.412.2468
hollisterlQ dvquilts@ qm Q il.com

..........— Forwarded m e ssag e ----- -----
From: Lisa A guirre <hollisterladvquilts@,gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 9:49 AM
Subject: Planning Commission
To: P&Z@ co.taney.mo.us

Messrs. Adams, Stewart, Cramer, Fogle, Lawrence, Caudill, Kitchen, Fabian and Flaes:

I have attended the last two Taney County Planning Com m ission meetings and wish to express my disdain for
the jo b you are providing the people o f Taney County. Your mission statement states in part "Our goal in the
Planning Departm ent is to provide the very best possible service to the citizens and visitors o f Taney County
within the requirements o f the Development Guidance Codes and polices". Have you even read this statement?
It appears from your recent decisions pertaining to Branson Creek that you have not. Not only have you
negatively im pacted the rights o f property owners but I believe you have set the county up for legal action.

The im pression I get from your panel is that you are a bunch o f country bumpkins who present themselves as
having just rode into town on a horse. Perhaps clean pants and a presentable shirt would be in order for public
hearings. This is the 21st century and "good ole boy networks" should be a thing o f the past. Mr. Chairman,
you are a mumbler. You need to learn enunciation or take a class in public speaking. In addition, you need to
learn what constitutes a majority vote. Really? You needed to talk among yourselves to determine if you had a
valid and binding vote? Know your business before you sit before the public.

You were presented with countless documents regarding present guidance codes, m aster subdivision plans etc.
which you obviously ignored. The Nightly Rental Permits should have been denied based upon current
guidelines alone. More than one legal opinion has been obtained determining that Branson Creek is not and
never was developed for nightly rentals. Just so you are clear, a legal opinion is a written statem ent from a law
firm who has reviewed the evidence, documents etc. and deem ed an opinion based upon the LAW and the
FACTS. You ignored buffer zones, parking requirements and what actually constitutes a "bedroom" in a home.
The hom ework you were provided was obviously ignored. For the record, a "closet" is part o f a structure. It
has a door and in enclosed and a person can step into it. A "wardrobe" is much like a dresser, bureau or armoire
which is a piece o f furniture and can be easily moved.

N ightly Rentals is obviously a hot topic in this community. W hat you all chose to do is "pass the buck". You
are afraid o f the consequences o f the almighty dollar and passed these permits so that other departments o f the
county would be accountable. By passing the buck, you are now engaging other county agencies like the Taney
County Fire District and Taney County Sheriffs D epartm ent to clean up after you. This will only cost Taney
l
County taxpayers m oney that doesn't need to be spent. Gentlemen, buck up and be men or resign from the
commission. In my humble opinion, not one o f you is fit to sit on this panel.

You may see the matter as concluded but I would suggest that this situation is far from over. I think you have
underestimated the homeowners in this subdivision.

Sincerely,

Lisa A g uirre
210.412.2468
hollisterladvquilts@ qm ail.com

2
Bonita Kissee

From: Randy Fogle [bfrchief3@ gm ail.com ]
Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2017 10:10 AM
To: Bonita Kissee
Subject: Fwd: Branson Creek nightly rentals Feb 21 hearing

A reply from Susan Smith that should be kept in some form due to public records

—........... Forwarded m e ssag e.............-
From: Susan Smith <trsmith@ centurytel.net>
Date: Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 16:02
Subject: Branson Creek nightly rentals Feb 21 hearing
To: <birchief3@ ,email.com>

It was enlightening to see a commissioner actually answer an email. Even tho Lisa's email was rough around the
edges and very blunt, she was right on! Monday nights meeting was a travesty. If I hadn't o f been there and
w itnessed it, I would have never believed what took place.

I have had so m any people email me even realtors, they can not not believe how the com missioners came to
their decision.

We had presented fact after fact starting with the conception o f the community. There was not one legal
docum ent to prove nightly rentals were ever approved. Even Frank Cottey agreed, that is why each owner o f
rental was to apply for special use permit.

We had Violation after Violation sited, complaint letters. We had everything to prove our point why these
should not be granted. They chose to ignore all. Sounds pretty suspicious to me.

They focused more on the difference between a closet and a wardrobe. Unreal.
Biggest concern, first applicant(nightly rental) from another subdivision, the commissioners couldn't come to a
majority, so it was put on hold.
But when they came to Branson Creek, 16 applicants all approved. Minimum discussion. If they had followed
their own guidance codes, these would never have been approved. The commissioners ju st set a precedent for
the destruction o f all pre-existing communities.
Susan Smith
Sent from my iPad

l
Bonita Kissee

From: Scott Starrett
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2017 9:45 AM
To: Bonita Kissee
Subject: FW: Branson C reek nightly R EN TALS

From: Susan Smith [ m a ilto:trsm ith @ ce nturyte l.ne t]
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2017 8:55 AM
To: P&Z
Cc: Scott S tarrett
Subject: Branson Creek nightly RENTALS

Dear Com m issioners
As an opposition to the nightly rentals that were granted Special Use Permits here in Branson Creek on
February 21.1 feel as a Branson Creek Permanent resident, we have the right to know why they were approved.
You had all the facts in a binder and all recorded docum ents and numerous complaints, what more could we
have provided?
Yet the 1st nightly rental on the agenda, you couldn't even come to a majority vote. We had 16 in one
community and you approved all with minimum discussion.
Frankly, I don't understand why the difference between a closet and a wardrobe took preference.
I feel the perm anent residents were not fairly treated. Also I feel this precedent you have ju st set, will be the
destruction o f many good communities.

W ill I get a reply back? Are will this just be filed away?
Susan Smith

Sent from my iPad

l
Bonita Kissee

From: Scott Starrett
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2017 9:55 AM
To: Bonita Kissee
Subject: FW: Ruling Feb 21

---- Original Message-----
From: Karen Murphy [mailto:klmnjm40@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2017 8:23 AM
To: P&Z
Subject: Ruling Feb 21

To all Commissioners
You went against your own enforcement code for 115 Greystone. A Division III Special Users
permit can only be applied for under 4.7.13 ownership by the owner of the property. You let
the prospective buyer of 115 Greystone complete an application. They are not the owner of the
property. They did not have to go through the regular channels of appearing before your court
at a concept meeting.

At the public hearing held on Feb 13th the commissioners all told Mr Phillips the owner of
115 Greystone that he could not apply for his prospective buyer and that he could not
transfer his permit. Guess what he outfoxed all of you.

You opened the door that eventually Branson Creek will be 100% nightly rentals with no
restrictive percentage. You know that rentals are not compatible with the neighborhood
because the covenant issues were pointed out at the Feb 13th hearing. You confirmed to all
the permanent residents who protested that "since those who were renting illegally without a
permit" that by golly they should be able to continue by approving the application. If the
developer mislead a rental buyer and Realtors, the developer should not be rewarded by now
giving these rental property owners a permit.

I commend Mr Stewart for all his nays. He voted with all the facts in mind (specifically
knowing there are no buffers) and the other commissioners voted yes to take the easy wayout.

We will fight all of last nights decisions with appeals.

From: Karen Murphy
Sent from my iPhone

l
Bonita Kissee

From: Randy Fogle [bfrchief3@ gm ail.com ]
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2017 12:44 PM
To: Bonita Kissee; hollisterladyquilts@ gm ail.com
Subject: Taney County P & Z

Ms. Aguirre,

I received your email through Bonita in the P&Z office and would like to respond on my behalf and not the
other members.

I am not aware o f what has taken place the last two meetings as I was absent and have not been provided an
update on the final actions. I am aware o f the situation in Branson Creek as well as the rest o f Taney County.

My only purpose in responding to your email is that I was listed as a participant in the last two meetings as
referenced which I was not.

The current nightly rental debate is an issue across the State o f M issouri and is being discussed in the House
under bill 608 and 632. I have not read these bills as I was only made aware o f their existence yesterday while
at the Capitol.

I would encourage you to look at these and contact your representative with any questions.

I am sure we will receive an update on the last two meeting as you referenced prior to our next meeting in
March.

Lastly, I applaud you for being involved in your county and m aking contact with us.

Sincerely,

Randy Fogle
Branson Township Representative

l
Scott Starrett

From: Susan Smith [trsm ith@ centurytel.net]
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 7:59 AM
To: P&Z
Cc: Scott Starrett
Subject: Branson Creek

I will attempt again for an answer to my question.
What basic did the commissioners have to approve nightlyrentals in BransonCreek? Since we
were the opposition , do we not have the right to know?

Also, please respond to my second question, Mr Billingsley at 226 Stoney Point, received the
same Notice of Violation letter everyone else received. He is notadhering to your notice.
Am I to assume no action will be taken?
I am appalled at the lack of inconsistency this PZ is operating.
Await your reply
Susan Smith
Sent from my iPad

1
Scott Starrett

From: Karen M urphy [klm njm 40@ gm ail.com ]
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 5:14 PM
To: P&Z; Scott Starrett
Subject: Branson C reek

To all commissioners
According to Guidance Code 4.5 on page 17: Applications for permits shall be made on
designated forms by the county. Incomplete applications shall not, under any circumstances,
be considered for approval.

Please note that all applications are not completed accurately. The within 600' land use was
not completed on some and the Villas were represented as 3 bedroom. The name of the
subdivision was inaccurate on some. The categories were not correct.

According to Appendix D the applicant was suppose to have sketches of the property along with
parking sketch. There are several driveways that share a driveway and there would not be
adequate parking.

The permits issued should be rescinded.

From: Karen Murphy
Sent from my iPhone

l
Scott Starrett

From: Karen M urphy [klm njm 40@ gm ail.com ]
Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2017 8:51 AM
To: S cott Starrett
Subject: 115 Greystone

Don Phillips applied for a Nightly rental permit but then at the Feb 21 ruling I believe the
commissioners went against the guidance code and the permit was issued to the prospective
buyer who had signed an application that supposedly you had in hand on Feb 21.

The application from the prospective buyer was not posted under the Feb 21 packet.

Please send me a copy of this application by the prospective buyer since it should have been
posted for public hearing.

From: Karen Murphy
Sent from my iPhone

l
Scott Starrett

From: Susan Sm ith [trsm ith@ centurytel.net]
Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2017 9:14 AM
To: Scott Starrett
Cc: P&Z
Subject: Branson creek

So let me get this clear. 115 greystone applies for special use perm it for nightly rentals in Oder to sell his
home. It is a approved. N ow his home has sold to new investor on February 27, 2017. So now the new investor
assumes they will be granted special use permit, because they would never have bought the hom e unless it was
a sure deal.
My question to the com missioners, therefore we as perm anent residents do not even need to show up at their
hearing, or any future hearings, because the com missioners have already made their decision? Correct?

And you think our county com missioners are fair?

Please forward to com missioners
I am still waiting to hear back from com missioners as to how they came to their approval vote.
This is a fair question.
Susan Smith
Sent from my iPad

l
Scott Starrett

From: Susan Smith [trsm ith@ centurytel.net]
Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2017 9:14 AM
To: Scott Starrett
Cc: P&Z
Subject: Branson creek

So let me get this clear. 115 greystone applies for special use perm it for nightly rentals in Oder to sell his
home. It is a approved. N ow his home has sold to new investor on February 27, 2017. So now the new investor
assumes they will be granted special use permit, because they w ould never have bought the hom e unless it was
a sure deal.
My question to the commissioners, therefore we as perm anent residents do not even need to show up at their
hearing, or any future hearings, because the com missioners have already made their decision? Correct?

And you think our county com missioners are fair?

Please forward to com missioners
I am still waiting to hear back from com missioners as to how they came to their approval vote.
This is a fair question.
Susan Smith
Sent from my iPad

l
Scott Starrett

From: Susan Sm ith [trsm ith@ centurytel.net]
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2017 8:54 AM
To: Scott Starrett
Cc: P&Z
Subject: Branson Creek

Please forward to all commissioners,

Per the notice below. H ow to you justify the bold statement?

I don't believe any o f these have been obtained, they have not come into com pliance as o f yet. Still continuing
to rent as we speak. You are not enforcing your ow n codes. Please explain.
Please reply to email that was sent yesterday.

December 16, 2016

NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Re: Notice o f V iolation o f the Taney County D evelopm ent Guidance Code

Dear Sir or Madem:

It has come to the attention o f the Taney County Planning Departm ent that the single-family residence that you
own a t ______________________ , Hollister, M issouri, is being utilized for nightly rental. Please be advised that
the Taney County D evelopm ent Guidance Code (“Code”) requires that you obtain a Special Use Permit
before using this property as a nightly rental, w hich the Code defines as:

“A residential building, structure or part thereof that may be rented for any period o f time less than thirty (30)
calendar days, counting portions o f days as full days. The term - Nightly Rental shall not include hotel, motel or
bed and breakfast establishm ents.”

If you intend to continue utilizing the above-described property as a nightly rental, please fill out the enclosed
application to begin the process o f applying for a Special Use Permit. If you have not submitted an application
within 30 days o f the date o f this letter, this m atter will be referred to the Taney County Prosecuting Attorney
for handling. Failure to com ply with the Code is a m isdem eanor punishable by a fine o f not more than one
thousand dollars ($1,000) or im prisonment in the county jail for a period not exceeding one (1) year, or both.

If you require assistance, or need more time to com plete the application process, please contact me at your
earliest convenience. Thank you in advance for your im mediate attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

Bob Atchley
Taney County Planning Adm inistrator

l
Bonita Kissee

From: Lisa Aguirre [hollisterladyquilts@ grnail.com ]
Sent: Sunday, March 05, 2017 5:20 PM
To: P&Z; Scott Starrett
Cc: Bonita Kissee
Subject: 136 Monte Cristo Dr., Hollister, Mo

All Comm issioners and Violation Department:

I am writing to com plain about the property at 136 M onte Cristo Dr., Hollister, MO. This property is owned by
Randy W atson from Lincoln, NE and does not currently have a Special Use Permit to operate as a nightly
rental. This weekend the noise and banging next door prom pted me to knock on the front door. There were two
individuals in the unit who were cleaning. I asked them if the unit was going to be rented and they said yes,
shortly. This is the second unit that this individual owns that does not have an approved Special Use Permit.
This owner needs to be put on notice from the county that he is operating illegally.

The com missioners have given the permanent residents o f Branson Creek the challenge o f policing the nightly
rentals in our SINGLE FAM ILY USE N EIGHBORHOOD and therefore, this is a formal complaint. The owner
should be charged the appropriate fine and the m atter turned over to the prosecuting attorney.

Be assured that if renters arrive, I will contact the Taney County Fire District immediately as im proper use of
this unit directly impacts the health, safety and well-being o f my family in the adjoining unit. In addition, you
will continue to receive complaints on each and every illegal rental until the matter is resolved according to the
law. I will be following up with you on the resolution o f this matter.

Sincerely,

Lisa A g uirre
210.412.2468
hollisterladyquilts@ qm ail.com

PS: Hard copies o f this email have been forwarded to the Taney County Violations Department V ia Certified
Mail #7014 1820 0000 2161 5257.

l
Scott Starrett

From: Susan Sm ith [trsm ith@ centurytel.net]
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2017 4:23 PM
To: S cott Starrett
Subject: Fwd: Branson creek

Will you not be forwarding this to the com missioners? We would like answers.

Sent from my iPad

Begin forwarded message:

From: Susan Smith <trsmith@,centurvtel.net>
Date: M arch 2, 2017 at 9:13:55 AM CST
To: Scott Starrett <scotts@ co.taney.mo.us>
Cc: P& Z@ co.taney.m o.us
Subject: Branson creek

So let me get this clear. 115 greystone applies for special use perm it for nightly rentals in Oder
to sell his home. It is a approved. N ow his hom e has sold to new investor on February 27, 2017.
So now the new investor assumes they will be granted special use permit, because they would
never have bought the hom e unless it was a sure deal.
My question to the com missioners, therefore we as perm anent residents do not even need to
show up at their hearing, or any future hearings, because the com missioners have already made
their decision? Correct?

And you think our county commissioners are fair?

Please forward to com missioners
I am still waiting to hear back from com missioners as to how they came to their approval vote.
This is a fair question.
Susan Smith
Sent from my iPad

l
Scott Starrett

From: W e s & Saundra [w stuscany@ centurytel.net]
Sent: Sunday, March 05, 2017 7:44 PM
To: P&Z
Subject: U naurthorized rentals in Branson C reek

Listed below are four units that over the weekend totally ignored the rules and rented their units anyway.
N um ber two has never filed for their special use perm it but ju st continues to rent without one. So once again
the rentals act like they are above the law and do whatever they want without any one enforcing the rules. You
tell us our recourse is to report these infarctions. Please stop turning a blind eye and enforce your own rules and
regulations and ensure that these people w ork w ithin the regulations that you the county has set up. PLEASE
N OTE THAT TW O OF THESE W ERE IN VIOLATION OF THE PARKING - THEY PARKED CARS IN
UNAUTHORIZED PARKING AREAS. SO THE PARKING PROBLEM S CONTINUES.

1. 137 N Tuscany - Owner Terry Pope live in Homeland, CA. Being rented w ithout the com pletion o f the
Special User permit. Car from Arkansas in driveway This V illa w ould not require sprinklers but needs
compliance certificate from Fire District. N eeds owner/agent inform ation with occupancy maxim um posted.

2. 110 N Tuscany - Owner Randy W atson live in Lincoln NE. They have not applied for Special User
Permit. Drive w ay too steep so Texas car is parked at the pool parking lo t. N eeds sprinklers - needs Owner
and Agent Inform ation with occupancy maxim um posted..

3. 115 Greystone - Owner P&P Faithful Four from M etamura, IL. N eeds sprinklers and owner/agent
information. Checking on perm it application. Renting without completed application and fire district
compliance certificate and occupancy maxim um and owner/agent inform ation posted. This house also needs a
health department certificate. Boats and cars parked in the driveway and hanging out onto the street. Cars and
boats parked at the M ountain Vista dead end road blocking the fire hydrant

4. 191 Greystone - Owner Branson Family M emories - Edm ond OK. Needs sprinklers and owner/agent
information. Renting without com pleted application and fire district com pliance certificate. Also needs health
department certificate.

Wes and Saundra Strange

l
Scott Starrett

From: Ed Fischer [e bfishr@ sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Sunday, March 05, 2017 7:09 PM
To: P&Z
Subject: Nightly Rentals

Attention: All commissioners

We attended the hearing on February 13 in regard to nightly rentals in Branson Creek. We were
also there February 21 when you., the planning and zoning commissioners voted to approve all
the applications. We cannot tell you how disappointed we were to hear your approval.

My husband and I moved here 5 years ago and planned to make Branson Creek our home for the
rest of our lives. We had planned it for 4 years. We had no idea what was in store for us.
You know the story, now we have nightly rentals throughout the neighborhood, overcrowding our
streets, making noise late at night, disrespectful of those who live here and using the
amenities we thought we would be able to use.

We are begging you please do not continue to approve every nightly rental application that
comes your way. Can't we let it stop here and now? I think our percentage of nightly rentals
in our neighborhood is quite adequate. So far we can still call it a neighborhood if we are
able to enforce some of the rules of the neighborhood. But if more and more nightly rentals
continue to appear, soon it will actually be just another resort. Full time residents will be
pushed out. As full time residents of Taney county, we'd like to feel just as important as a
visitor.

It seems that permanent residents are not really welcome in Taney county. Taney county is
only interested in visitors coming to Branson, spending their money and then going home. We
spent money here too! We spend money all year round. We buy cars, appliances, insurance and
pay for doctors and dentists all year long. Why are we not considered as important as a
visitor to Branson? I am so sorry we ever came to live here. I have friends who have thought
about moving to Branson. I will no longer encourage them.

Please consider the lives of regular people who just wanted to live here. Thank you.

Betty and Ed Fischer

Sent from my iPad

l
Scott Starrett

From: Lisa Aguirre [hollisterladyquilts@ gm ail.com ]
Sent: Sunday, March 05, 2017 5:21 PM
To: P&Z; Scott Starrett
Subject: 137 N. Tuscany, Hollister, MO

M arch 5, 2017

All Taney County Planning and Zoning Comm issioners and V iolation Department:

I am writing to com plain about the property at 137 N. Tuscany Drive, Hollister, MO. This property is owned by
Terry Pope from Homeland, CA and has not currently com pleted the conditions o f the Special Use Permit
issued on February 13, 2017. This weekend there were renters from Arkansas parked in the driveway even
though a garage is provided for this use. To my knowledge, a compliance certificate from the Fire Department
has not been obtained and there is no current signage for em ergency contacts, m axim um occupancy etc. Why
are you issuing Special Use Permits if you don't intend to carry out the requirements o f said perm it? As
complaints continue to mount, perhaps you you will reconsider your decisions o f February 13, 2017.

The com missioners have given the perm anent residents o f Branson Creek the challenge o f policing the nightly
rentals in our SINGLE FAM ILY USE N EIG HBORHOOD and therefore, this is a formal complaint. The owner
should have the perm it revoked as your com mission stated it would should there be non-com pliance issues.
Again, as you have given us the task o f policing the enforcem ent o f your permits, we need the inform ation that
was required when said perm it was issued. In addition, without proper fire department sign-off, you are
endangering the adjoining homes.

One has to w onder why your com mission failed to follow the current laws as set forth on the plats for this
subdivision. In addition, you failed to consider two legal opinions obtained by Taney County stating that
nightly rentals were not perm itted in Fieldstone. You even acknowledged that fact that our HOA does not allow
nightly rentals so you have now com pounded the problem so that the owners must challenge both Taney County
and the HOA. As individuals charged with making lawful decisions for the residents o f Taney County, I
sincerely hope you take this com plaint to the maxim um extent o f the law. I will be following up w ith you on
the resolution.

Lisa A g uirre
210.412.2468
hollisterlQ dyquilts@ qm Q il.com

PS: Hard copies o f this email have been forwarded to the Taney County Violations Departm ent V ia Certified
Mail #7014 1820 0000 2161 5257.

l
Scott Starrett

From: Lisa Aguirre [hoilisterladyquilts@ gm ail.com ]
Sent: Sunday, March 05, 2017 5:21 PM
To: P&Z; Scott Starrett
Subject: 115 G reystone, Hollister, MO

M arch 5, 2017

All Taney County Planning and Zoning Comm issioners and V iolation Department:

I am writing to com plain about the property at 115 Greystone Drive, Hollister, MO. This property is owned by
P & P Faithful Four from M etamura, IL and has not currently completed the conditions o f the Special Use
Perm it issued on February 13, 2017. This weekend there were boats and cars parked in the driveway and
hanging out onto the street. In addition, cars and boats were parked at the M ountain V ista dead end road
blocking the fire hydrant. As a reminder, no off-street parking is allowed. To my knowledge, a compliant
sprinkler system has not been installed nor has a com pliance certificate from the Fire D epartm ent been
obtained. There is no current signage for em ergency contacts, maxim um occupancy etc. Lastly, I believe a
H ealth Departm ent Certificate is required for this property. W hy are you issuing Special Use Permits if you
don't intend to carry out the requirements o f said permit? As complaints continue to mount, perhaps you you
will reconsider your decisions o f February 13, 2017.

The com missioners have given the perm anent residents o f Branson Creek the challenge o f policing the nightly
rentals in our SINGLE FAM ILY USE N EIG HBORHOOD and therefore, this is a formal complaint. The owner
should have the perm it revoked as your com mission stated it would should there be non-com pliance issues.
Again, as you have given us the task o f policing the enforcem ent o f your permits, we need the inform ation that
was required when that perm it was issued and the assurance that all conditions have been met.

One has to w onder why your com mission failed to follow the current laws as set forth on the plats for this
subdivision. In addition, you failed to consider two legal opinions obtained by Taney County stating that
nightly rentals were not perm itted in Fieldstone. You even acknowledged that fact that our HOA does not allow
nightly rentals so you have now com pounded the problem so that the owners must challenge both Taney County
and the HOA. As individuals charged with making lawful decisions for the residents o f Taney County, I
sincerely hope you take this com plaint to the maxim um extent o f the law. I will be following up with you on
the resolution.

Lisa A guirre
210.412.2468
hollisterlQdyquilts@qmQil.com

PS: Hard copies o f this email have been forwarded to the Taney County Violations Departm ent V ia Certified
M ail #7014 1820 0000 2161 5257.

i
Scott Starrett

From: Lisa Aguirre [hollisterladyquilts@ gm ail.com ]
Sent: Sunday, March 05, 2017 5:20 PM
To: P&Z; Scott Starrett
Subject: 110 N. Tuscany, Hollister, MO

All Commissioners and V iolation Department:

I am writing to com plain about the property at 110N . Tuscany Drive, Hollister, MO. This property is owned by
Randy W atson from Lincoln, N E and does not currently have a Special Use Perm it to operate as a nightly
rental. This w eekend the renters, from Texas, did not park at the property because o f the steep incline o f the
driveway but rather chose to park at the community pool. This parking lot is not intended for this use. This is
just one o f many issues you failed to address w hen you approved Special Use Permits for other owners. As
complaints continue to mount, perhaps you you will reconsider your decisions o f February 13, 2017.

The com missioners have given the perm anent residents o f Branson Creek the challenge o f policing the nightly
rentals in our SINGLE FAM ILY USE N EIG HBORHOOD and therefore, this is a formal complaint. The owner
should be charged the appropriate fine and the m atter turned over to the prosecuting attorney.

One has to w onder why your com mission failed to follow the current laws as set forth on the plats for this
subdivision. In addition, you failed to consider two legal opinions obtained by Taney County, whom you
represent, stating that nightly rentals were not perm itted in Fieldstone. You even acknowledged the fact that
our HOA does not allow nightly rentals so you have now com pounded the problem so that the owners must
challenge both Taney County and the HOA. As individuals charged with m aking lawful decisions for the
residents o f Taney County, I sincerely hope you take this com plaint to the m axim um extent o f the law. I will be
following up with you on the resolution o f this matter.

Sincerely,

Lisa A g uirre
210.412.2468
hollisterladyquilts@ qm Q il.com

i
Scott Starrett

From: Lisa Aguirre [hollisterladyquilts@ gm ail.com ]
Sent: Sunday, March 05, 2017 5:20 PM
To: P&Z; S cott Starrett
Subject: 191 Greystone, Hollister, MO

All Commissioners and V iolation Department:

I am writing to com plain about the property at 191 Greystone, Hollister, MO. This property is owned by
Branson Family M emories from Edmond, OK. To my knowledge, the owner has not currently completed the
conditions o f the Special Use Perm it issued on February 13, 2017 including the installation o f a compliant
sprinkler system, nor has a com pliance certificate from the Fire D epartm ent been obtained. There is no current
signage for em ergency contacts, m aximum occupancy etc. Lastly, I believe a Health D epartm ent Certificate is
required for this property. These requirements are for the health and safety o f individuals who rent these
properties. W ill it take the death o f someone to assure com pliance with the permits you issue? The law is the
law and should be followed by each and everyone including you the commissioners.

The com missioners have given the perm anent residents o f Branson Creek the challenge o f policing the nightly
rentals in our SINGLE FAM ILY USE N EIG HBORHOOD and therefore, this is a formal complaint. The
owner' perm it should be revoked as your com m ission stated it would if there were com pliance issues. We are
not even a m onth into these approvals and already issues have arisen.. The health, safety and welfare o f all
residents is at stake with this non-compliance and we have you to thank for that.

One has to w onder why your com mission failed to follow the current laws as set forth on the plats for this
subdivision. In addition, you failed to consider two legal opinions obtained by Taney County, whom you
represent, stating that nightly rentals are not now or ever have been perm itted in Fieldstone. You even
acknowledged the fact that our HOA does not allow nightly rentals so you have now com pounded the problem
so that the owners must challenge both Taney County and the HOA. As individuals charged with making
lawful decisions for the residents o f Taney County, I sincerely hope you take this com plaint to the m aximum
extent o f the law. I will be following up with you on the resolution o f this matter.

Sincerely,

Lisa A g uirre
210.412.2468
hollisterladyquilts@ qm ail.com

i
Scott Starrett

From: Lisa Aguirre [hollisterladyquilts@ gm ail.com ]
Sent: Sunday, March 05, 2017 5:20 PM
To: P & Z ; S cott Sta rrett
Cc: Bonita Kissee
Subject: 136 M onte C risto Dr., Hollister, Mo

All Commissioners and V iolation Department:

I am writing to com plain about the property at 136 M onte Cristo Dr., Hollister, MO. This property is owned by
Randy W atson from Lincoln, NE and does not currently have a Special Use Perm it to operate as a nightly
rental. This w eekend the noise and banging next door prom pted me to knock on the front door. There were two
individuals in the unit who were cleaning. I asked them if the unit was going to be rented and they said yes,
shortly. This is the second unit that this individual owns that does not have an approved Special Use Permit.
This owner needs to be put on notice from the county that he is operating illegally.

The com missioners have given the perm anent residents o f Branson Creek the challenge o f policing the nightly
rentals in our SINGLE FAM ILY USE N EIGHBORHOOD and therefore, this is a formal complaint. The owner
should be charged the appropriate fine and the m atter turned over to the prosecuting attorney.

Be assured that if renters arrive, I will contact the Taney County Fire D istrict immediately as im proper use o f
this unit directly impacts the health, safety and well-being o f my family in the adjoining unit. In addition, you
will continue to receive com plaints on each and every illegal rental until the matter is resolved according to the
law. I will be following up with you on the resolution o f this matter.

Sincerely,

Lisa A guirre
210.412.2468
hoilisterladyquilts@ qm ail.com

PS: Hard copies of this email have been forwarded to the Taney County Violations Department Via Certified
Mail #7014 1820 0000 2161 5257.

l
Scott Starrett

From: Judy W ard [judyw ard14076@ gm ail.com ]
Sent: Sunday, March 05, 2017 5:50 AM
To: S cott Starrett; P&Z
Subject: Nightly Rentals

I would like to report on nightly
rentals in BransonCreek. 13 7 N
Tuscany - Being rented the without
the completion of special User
Permit.Car from Arkansas in
driveway. 110 N Tuscany - Being
rented -Driveway too steep,so Texas
car is parked at the pool parking
lot.l 15Greystone- Being rented
Boats and cars parked in the drive
way and hanging out in the street.
Cars and boats parked at the
Mountain VISTA DEAD END
ROAD BLOCKING THE FIRE
HYDRANT. 191Grey stone-Being
rented. Thank you for reading
this. Judith Ward
Scott Starrett

From: Karen M urphy [klm njm 40@ gm ail.com ]
Sent: Saturday, March 04, 2017 5:29 PM
To: P&Z; Scott Starrett
Subject: To All C om m issioners

167 N Tuscany owned by Hill Property Investments LLC.

We would like to complain about the property listed above. This property has been a constant
problem with violations of nuisance., loud partying., parking in the street and using our
amenities without being accompanied by the owner.

The occupancy has been
over the 6 persons allowed for a 2 bedroom rental. Originally it was combined with 165 N
Tuscany and the two together were advertised as a seven bedroom rental by Sunset Rentals.

This property continues to be rented without a Special Use permit.
They are definitely in violation of the county code and the fire district code.

Unless the renter is able to use the garage, the driveway only accommodates two vehicles.

We were platted as single family dwellings and therefore the buffer section of your guidance
code should be enforced. We are not "condo styled" dwellings.

We realize that you state you don't consider the covenants; however in the previous 16 permit
approvals you didn't even make it a requirement that the owners had to be in compliance with
the covenants of Branson Creek.

Our covenants do not permit nightly rentals only leases that have to be approved by our HOA
and a copy of the lease on file at the HOA office. The approval for the Special Use permit
with conditions to be met met did not include that they were to be in compliance with the
Branson Creek covenants.

You, the commissioners, have opened up a Pandora's box in Branson Creek. There is no limit on
the number of rentals you will be approving in our residential community. If they apply you
approve?
You have transferred compliance to Branson Crfeek permanent residents to be the enforcer.
You not only destroyed our neighborhood by your decisions, you destroyed the retirement lives
of over 60 elderly permanent Taney County residents by bowing to the pressure of outside
investors and certain real estate and real estate management firms.
What a shame.

It is not acceptable that the developer and the HOA lied to potential buyers. Usually if you
lie you get caught and punished. However, in the case of Branson Creek Communities, the
commissioners rewarded instead of punishing the lie.

We ask that you do not approve this permit.

From: Neil and Karen Murphy
112 Monte Cristo Dr
Hollister Mo. 65672
2 8 1 -4 3 3 -6 7 4 0

1
Scott Starrett

From: Karen M urphy [klm njm 40@ gm ail.com ]
Sent: Saturday, March 04, 2017 5:29 PM
To: P&Z; Scott Starrett
Subject: To All C om m issioners

127 N Tuscany owned by Roy & Jane Glazer

We would like to com plain about the property listed above. The driveway is so steep that the renters park in the
street on a bad curve and incline grade that restricts seeing the parked vehicles when residents drive on the
street. There have been skate boarders using the steep driveway and going into the street. Very dangerous.
Using our amenities without being accompanied by the owner.

On the application they stated they were in com pliance with the HOA covenants. This is not accurate.
Again,our covenants do not perm it nightly rentals only leases that have to be approved by our HOA and a copy
o f the lease on file at the HOA office.

This property continues to be rented without a Special Use permit. They are definitely in violation o f the county
code and the fire district code.

We were platted as single family dwellings and therefore the buffer section o f your guidance code should be
enforced. We are not "condo styled" dwellings.

The 16 previous approvals for the Special Use perm it with conditions to be met met did not include that they
were to be in com pliance with the Branson Creek covenants.

We realize that you state you don't consider the covenants; how ever in the previous 16 perm it approvals you
didn't even make it a requirem ent that the owners had to be in compliance with the covenants o f Branson Creek.

You, the commissioners, have opened up a Pandora's box in Branson Creek. There is no limit on the number o f
rentals you will be approving in our residential community. If they apply you approve? You have transferred
compliance to Branson Creek perm anent residents to be the enforcer. You not only destroyed our neighborhood
by your decisions, you destroyed the retirem ent lives o f over 60 elderly perm anent Taney County residents by
bowing to the pressure o f outside investors and certain real estate and real estate m anagem ent firms. W hat a
shame!

It is not acceptable that the developer and the HOA lied to potential buyers. Usually if you lie you get caught
and punished. However, in the case o f Branson Creek Comm unities, the com missioners rewarded instead o f
punishing the lie.

We ask that you do not approve this permit.

From: Neil and Karen M urphy
112 Monte Cristo Dr
Hollister Mo. 65672

l
Scott Starrett

From: Susan Smith [trsm ith@ centurytel.net]
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2017 4:23 PM
To: Scott Starrett
Subject: Fwd: Branson creek

Will you not be forwarding this to the com missioners? We w ould like answers.

Sent from my iPad

Begin forwarded message:

From: Susan Smith <trsm ith@ centurytel.net>
Date: M arch 2, 2017 at 9:13:55 AM CST
To: Scott Starrett <scotts@,co.taney.mo.us>
Cc: P& Z@ co.taney.mo.us
Subject: Branson creek

So let me get this clear. 115 greystone applies for special use perm it for nightly rentals in Oder
to sell his home. It is a approved. N ow his home has sold to new investor on February 27, 2017.
So now the new investor assumes they will be granted special use permit, because they would
never have bought the home unless it was a sure deal.
My question to the commissioners, therefore we as perm anent residents do not even need to
show up at their hearing, or any future hearings, because the com missioners have already made
their decision? Correct?

And you think our county commissioners are fair?

Please forward to com missioners
I am still waiting to hear back from com missioners as to how they came to their approval vote.
This is a fair question.
Susan Smith
Sent from my iPad

l
Scott Starrett

From: Susan Smith [trsm ith@ centurytel.net]
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2017 7:03 AM
To: P&Z
Cc: Scott Starrett
Subject: Branson creek nightly rentals

This an official complaint
167 N Tuscany

My deck faces this villa's deck. During the sum m er the loud partying can be heard from my
deck, loud music and cursing are not uncommon.. The serenity I was promised when I moved here is no more.
This villa continually over books way beyond w hat a 2 bedroom should have. Cars parked in the road. W hich is
very narrow, preventing the safety o f walkers. Large boats parked in the driveway.
Then renters from that villa have brought their partying to our small pool. Preventing perm anent residents the
enjoyment o f our amenity. Beer cans and trash are left leaving perm anent residents to pick up after them.
All together there are more than 28 nightly rentals in our com munity which you com missioners seem to care
less. There is no way possible there can be com patibility within this community w ith this many nightly rentals.
If you m ultiply this com plaint times 28, can you not imagine the disruption this causes am ongst our community.
I did not buy into a resort style living neighborhood.
I was promised the life style that a retired person could enjoy.
W ake up commissioners, don't let greedy investors and realtors influence your decision.

Sent from my iPad

l