P&Z Public Meeting Packet

T a n e y C o u n t y P l a n n i n g C o m m i s s io n
P. O. Box 383 • Forsyth, Missouri 65653
Phone: 417 546-7225 / 7226 • Fax: 417 546-6861
website: www. taneycounty, org

AGENDA
TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
PUBLIC HEARING
MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 2015, 6:00 P.M.
COUNTY COMMISSION HEARING ROOM
TANEY COUNTY COURTHOUSE

Call to Order:
Establishment o f Quorum
Explanation o f Meeting Procedures
Presentation o f Exhibits

Public Hearings:
The Battlefield
Weddings a t the Homestead

Old and New Business:
Beaver Creek Canoe Rental

Adjournm ent.
 TANEY COUNTY
TANEY PLANNING COMMISSION

COUNTY DIVISION III PERMIT
STAFF REPORT
HEARING DATE: Septem ber 14, 2015

CASE NUMBER: 2015-0018

PROJECT: The Battlefield

APPLICANTS: Mike & Alison Miles

REPRESENTATIVE: Brad Hoffman - Yung Design Group

LOCATION: The subject property is located on Tracy
Street, off of Jefferson Road, Branson, MO;
Branson Township; Section 9, Township 23,
Range 21.

REQUEST: The applicants, Mike & Alison Miles are
requesting approval of a Division III Permit
authorizing indoor batting cages.

BACKGROUND and SITE HISTORY:
The subject property is a meets & bounds described property which is actually
comprised of seven (7) individual meets & bounds described tract of land, located on
Tracy Street off of Jefferson Road, Branson, MO. The property in question is a total of
+/- 111.48 acres in size (per the A ssessor’s information as contained within Beacon).
The property is shown via Beacon as two (2) separate parcels. Parcel # 08-2.0-09-000­
000-035.000 is indicated within Beacon as +/-15.48 acres in size. Parcel # 08-2.0-09­
000-000-050.001 is indicated within Beacon as +/- 96.00 acres in size. The properties
in question are currently used prim arily for the raising of cattle.

The applicants are now requesting the Planning Commission approval o f the Division III
Permit application authorizing indoor batting cages.

The current application was approved for Concept on August 17, 2015.

GENERAL DESCRIPTION:

The applicants are now requesting the Planning Commission approval o f the Division
Permit application allowing for the establishm ent of indoor batting cages.

Division III Permit Staff Report - The Battlefield - 2015-0018 Page 1
REVIEW:

The applicants are seeking the approval of a Division III Permit which would authorize
the establishm ent of the Battlefield; consisting of indoor batting cages with a total of five
stations, to be located within an 11,000 square foot (100’ x 110’) building. The building
will also contain two (2) restroom facilities and vending machines. The Battlefield is
proposed to be located within an approxim ately 2.50 acre fenced in area near the center
of the applicant’s +/- 111.48 acre property.

Per the submitted site plan, the Battlefield will be served by a com m ercial driveway, off
of Jefferson Road. The drive will be located at the same location as the existing
driveway, within a 50’ wide access easement. The portion of the driveway located
within the right-of-way of Jefferson Road will be required to be built in com pliance with
the requirem ents enum erated within Section 10 of Section 4 of the Road Standards.

Per the submitted site plan, the Battlefield will be served by twelve (12) parking spaces,
including one (1) handicapped parking space. The On-Site Parking Perform ance
Standards of the Developm ent Guidance Code do not specifically address parking
requirements for indoor batting cages. However, the applicants will have more than
adequate space to expand the parking if needed in the future.

The property in question will be served by an onsite waste w ater treatm ent system.
Since this is a com m ercial application the system will be required to be permitted via
Scott Starrett, On-Site W astewater Permitting, in conjunction with the Missouri
Departm ent of Health and Senior Services.

The adjoining property im m ediately to the north of the 2.5 acre fenced area is vacant
property owned by the applicants, with Jefferson Road, the Sum m erbrooke Estates
Subdivision, the Mill Creek Subdivision and also apartm ents being located further to the
north. The adjoining property im m ediately to the south of the 2.5 acre fenced area is
vacant property owned by the applicants, with the Savannah Place Subdivision being
located further to the south. The adjoining property im m ediately to the east is
predom inately vacant. The adjoining property im m ediately to the w est of the 2.5 acre
fenced area is vacant property owned by the applicants, with the residential and storage
uses being located further to the west.

The Battlefield will be buffered from neighboring residential uses by the existing
vegetation and also an expanse of property.

The project received a score of 0 on the Policy Checklist, out of a maximum possible
score of 59. The relative policies receiving a negative score consist of right-of-way on
existing roads, em ergency water supply and solid waste disposal service, storm water
drainage and utilities.

Division III Permit Staff Report - The Battlefield - 2015-0018 Page 2
 E
L O C A T IO N M A P

T H E B A T T L E F IE L D
PREPARED FOR: M IK E AND A LISO N MILES J O B # 7204
 M6UM!N*Sf?ja8ftHj?_reN
A 1FV>0I Of LANUait U«1cl) W»AHI CM T-KawmOl 3EGHONH.
1WYN3 II" If.INtWtH tfANOiill *ruai. IANS?C0UNI*.MHi80URl.
BilMU MU«6 “AMI ICHAKir OMMBSU A8 K U fW I
BstilNNINOAl iHSfitfdtHEI
tusNCe
n o optjo* fc. a 0*61asce or
jUiaiANctot - t i a j K t i , it
81)W00‘ E. A081 AWE Of IBS -tfsEV. (HENCE N99W W V*.i
BlStANCE Of 39' 60 FEET. tflENCE N#W I0' =.A98TANCS0f
319.34 FEET: tHSNCE N 90W&0* E. A 0I6TANCE O t t a t t rtEt,
‘ filEMGS
saii'oMf- £,Adi3l ANCeOl tn> isfee i rtENCESwHinWu
0'3 fANdE Of 90 ro r EEr. ft) THE NEWPONt or OEOMNNG. SAI fohl. AREA
; ‘m ACt CONtAININCi i so AoieS Of LANO. MO^= LSSfi too,a te :i:> sq f t
tj.no acres
AtSO S'Jtt,SCt 10 ANBtOQEfHE* VMMI

8
ANACC69B tA8cMy«I LYINGOVUMAN=JACROSS*A*f Of life
iViNANOMA^rOf IM twadFSEOIION^ rOWN«ll»»
NORM. HANOU it WS6I. IA*J£Y CO\JNl v MldSrV.Ml. EJEING1WMiir
-ON each biuk or i he follow ing 'Jf-.sghweJ cente>«.ins
BEGINNINGAt IHE SOJMEA3I COHNSMOf 9AM SECTION<*.
THEMCE HOWW i . A OISl ANCEOf «MM IB I.TIC M S N
•WHOOO* W A 'JtStANCE OF t4'W FEEl; fHENtt
N Br45 J«- *Y,A 0181ANCEOf 29 90 FEET. 10 THE‘6 W -W I Of
BEGINNING IMENCEAIONG l-K M N It1 *l» O r iA M M lM S fl
•AS rottows I'lENtiE NORIHrYESIE'V AtONG A NOrMANGENT
Ci«vs tO fllE LSrt. 9579 FEEt (SAC C.WE '(AViNBAOELTAOf
4 * -oNr. HAviNd A CtOfld BEAMINGAND DISTANCEOf NtfWSf-
W. Mi!0 rEEt ANO-lAVlNGA lAOlUS OF <3000 TESTkftlENCS N
is no 'if w a otatANCs Of n i l r u t . tnsnoe NtwtwsaitMi.*
ALONa A riu^VI. TO (ME HlGrtr. ‘ m u/ rt:.I (8ATJCJ^VI. 'IAVW0A
J i l l IA Of 83'OHM‘ AND 11AVINGA NAUW8 Of MO30 IEU1Y fffeNCt C O M M ER C IA L ZONING FOR
SH \ rt/Tit)- W, A Ol9fANOK Of f3M f~ =I.T ItNCE
--■NOMIhWE8IE*Uv ALONGA ClMVH 10 IMEUf T. TB»fELT QAU INDOOR BATTING CAGES
CiWVS HAVINGA OELIA Of 9-03W* ANJ HAVINGA =«Ai*JSOF
4111)UUtEEt ). I HENCE Na'S'tB* V». A Jfc31ANCEOf 1SUtOFEEt,
StHSNGE NOfT IEHL'AtONGACUNVe 10 HE>«im .’ 0- »9FE6t * 1- 2.5 ACRES \
,<SAO CURVE HAVINGA 3£t f AOf 41‘3101• ANJ ' IAV>*«A “WOWS
■of <4000►zuy. imencen t?‘4 /'jr £.A O ia tA W i.i« » irttT ;
St-rlENCE NOMT*l-.A8rE^t» AtONO A OW E TOt i t LETT t»M
FEET (SAIJ CvJrtVE ‘IAVINTJA Oik IA OF 0*0V A‘« -lAvrfG A
RAOIJS Of 300 00 fEEf * fMSNCE N1M*-| V E. A DISTANCEOf 34.H
FEET. TOA ■'Oil t ONTHEBttl I -1=‘fl. VMIO tt-Or «VA<‘ LINEOf
:.,tf fSRSON «OAO fO=«A sOlNt Of 1UNMINJ8.1 l‘i 9lJtllNC30t
SfiJOEASEMiNT A>te SHO^IfcNeO 0>» i.4T=NUEO tOMEXT Al
ANGLE >»OlNia
CL.AMIF|CA1K)NI
•JUBAN0U<<VEV*
HECOHU aOtMCE-
|0EEU fUCOHJEO INBOOKWI4. At PAGE 3»t4J TANKTWXJNIT
NLGO*<i)jlt0 Of riCE. tAMEf COUNIV. MI960JKI

LOWNtHS (l» INI OMM»I IONOr AUjOININO ^A'-tCCLS,AS 3-KM>N
«EON, WASOAINEO FROMT‘IJ TANS' COUNTYCIS MA=»«Na
lb sire. rOviNOAt nw»jW»«e*»-*cWn*>Mwa»<B<r^. stats Or
•sou^i. couNtv o r tanjv. no guarantee isgnsn ro m e
CJHAfcr Of t>ll9lNfO^MAIlON

M A S T E R P L A N F O R IN D O O R B A T T IN G C A G E S
m
120
j i H
60 30 0 60 120 jw.rw.aoi5

YUNGDESIGNGHOUP
T H E B A T T L E F IE L D
PREPARED FOR: M IK E AND A LISO N MILES JO B # 7204
 Son road

^ftsiao.oo'
■BftNS-aN1?*50’5?* V
Dt$1\«93.S6'
H8$*45*3V
TOTAL AREA
I ±108,848.33 SQ. FT.
I ±2.50 ACRES ----

COMMERCIAL ZONING FO
INDOOR BATTING CAGES
+/- 2.5 ACRES

T H E B A T T L E F IE L D
PR EPARED FO R: M IK E A N D A LIS O N MILES
The Battlefield Permit#: 15-18

Section Score
Performance

Importance
Division 111 Relative Policy Scoring Sheet:

Factor
Eastern Taney County

Score
Value
W ater Q uality
S E W A G E D IS P O S A L n/a=
cen tra lized system 2
on -site tre a tm e n t system (s) w ith a d eq ua te sa fe g u a rd s to m itig ate pollution 1
se p tic system o f ad e q u a te de sig n and cap acity 0 5 0 0
proposed system m ay not provide ad e q u a te cap acity -1
pro po sed solutio n m ay ca u se surface a n d/or ground w a te r pollution -2

Environm ental Policies
STO R M D R A IN A G E n/a=
o n -site s to rm w a te r reten tion and ab sorp tion w ith en g in e e re d plans 2
o n -site s to rm w a te r reten tion and ab sorp tion w ith o u t en g in e e re d plans 1
sto rm w a te r retention w ith m an ag ed and a cce p ta b le ru n -o ff 0 4 -1 -4
no s to rm w a te r retention, but a d ve rse im p acts from ru n -o ff have been m itigated -1
no a cce p ta b le m a n a g e m e n t and con tro l o f sto rm w a te r ru n -o ff -2
A IR Q U A LIT Y n/a=
can no t ca u se im pact 0
could im p act but a p p ro p ria te a b a te m e n t installed -1 4 0 0
could im pact, no a b a te m e n t o r unknow n im p act -2

Critical Areas
P R E S E R V A T IO N O F C R IT IC A L A R E A S n/a=
no a d ve rse im p a ct to any d e sig nate d critical area 2
one o f the d e sig nate d critica l areas im p acted but can be fu lly m itig ated 1
m ore than one o f the d e sig n a te d critica l are as im p acted but can be fu lly m itigated 0 3 2 6
one o r m ore o f th e d e sig nate d critica l areas im p acted and m itig atio n not fully effective -1
one o r m ore o f th e d e sig n a te d critica l areas im p acted w ith no a b ility to m itigate problem -2

Land Use Com patibility
O F F -S IT E N U IS A N C E S n/a=
no issues 2
m inim al issues, but can be fu lly m itigated 1
issues th a t can be buffered and m itigated to a re a son able level 0 4 2 8
buffered and m in im ally m itigated -1
can no t be m itigated -2
USE C O M P A T IB ILIT Y n/a=
no c o n flicts / isolated property 0
tra n sp a re n t ch a n g e / ch a n g e not rea dily no ticea ble -1 4 0 0
im p act rea dily a p p a re n t / out o f place -2

Page 1 of 5
The Battlefield Permit#: 15-18

Section Score
Performance

Importance
Division Hi Relative Policy Scoring Sheet:

Factor
Eastern Taney County

Score
Value
S T R U C T U R A L S C R E E N IN G O F R O O FT O P E Q U IP M E N T & V E N T S n/a= X

no roo fto p e q u ip m e n t / ven ts o r blocked from view by stru ctu re design or scree ning 0

partially blocke d from vie w -1 3

exposed / n ot blocke d from view -2

S T R U C T U R A L S C R E E N IN G O F S O LID W A S T E C O N T A IN E R S n/a= X

no o n -site w a ste co n ta in e rs o r blocked from vie w by stru ctu re design o r screening 0

partially blocke d from view -1 3

exposed / not blocked from view -2

S T R U C T U R A L S C R E E N IN G O F O U T D O O R EQ UIP, S T O R A G E , ETC. n/a= X

no o u td o o r storag e o f e q uipm en t, m aterials, etc., o r o u td o o r w o rk are as 2

blocked from vie w by stru ctu re design 1
blocked from vie w using scree ning 0 3

p a rtially b locke d from view -1

exposed / not blocked from view -2

LA N D S C A P E D B U F F E R S - R E S ID E N T IA L n/a= X

appro ved la nd scape d b u ffe r betw een ho m es and all streets / roads / highw ays 2

approved la nd scape d bu ffe r from m a jo r roa ds / high w ays only 1
m inim al la nd scape d buffer, but co m p e n sa te s w ith exp an se o f land 0 2

no la n d sca p e d bu ffe r betw een reside nces and local streets -1
no la nd scape d bu ffe r from any road -2

LA N D S C A P E D B U F F E R S - IN D U S T R IA L n/a= X

approved la nd scape d bu ffe r from p u b lic roads 0

m inim al la nd scape d buffer, but co m p e n sa te s w ith exp an se o f land -1 3
no la nd scape d bu ffe r from p u blic roads -2

Local Econom ic Developm ent
A G R IC U L T U R A L LAN DS n/a=
no con version o f C lass l-IV a g ricu ltural land to o th e r use(s) 0
d e ve lo p m e n t requires re cla ssifica tio n o f C lass l-IV a g ricu ltu ra l land to o th e r use(s) -2

R IG H T TO FARM n/a=
does not lim it existing a g ricu ltu ra l uses / do es not ca u se nuisance, predation 0
does not lim it existing a g ricu ltu ra l uses, but m ay re su lt in m in o r nuisance -1 3 0 0
potential im p act(s) on existing ag ricu ltural land -2

R IG H T TO O P E R A T E n/a= X

no via b le im p a ct on existing indu strial uses by re sid e n tia l d e ve lo p m e n t 0
potential im p a ct but can be m itigated -1 2

potential im p a ct on existing in du strial uses w ith no m itig atio n -2

Page 2 o f 5
The Battlefield Permit#: 15-18

Section Score
Performance

Importance
Division III Relative Policy Scoring Sheet:

Factor
Eastern Taney County

Score
Value
D IV E R S IF IC A T IO N n/a=

cre a te s >=5 full-tim e, ye a r-ro u n d jo b s ou tside o f recre atio n / re so rt secto r 2

crea te s full-tim e, yea r-rou nd and sea son al jo bs 1 4 0 0
crea te s sea son al jo b s only 0

Site Planninq, Design, Occupancy
R E S ID E N T IA L P R IV A C Y n/a= x

privacy provided by structura l design, or not ap p lica b le 2
privacy pro vid ed by structura l scree ning 1
privacy pro vid ed by la n d sca p e d buffers 0 2

privacy pro vid ed by open spa ce -1

no a cce p ta b le o r e ffe ctive privacy buffering -2

M IX E D -U S E D E V E L O P M E N T S n/a= X

uses / fu n ctio n s are co m p a tib le o r not ap plicab le 2

uses / fu n ctio n s are in te g ra te d and sep ara te d based on co m p a tib ility 1
uses / fu n ctio n s d iffe r m in im a lly and are not readily a p pa rent 0 3

uses / fu n ctio n s po orly in te gra te d o r sep ara te d -1
uses / fu n ctio n s m ixed w ith o u t regard to c o m p a tib lity factors -2

Com m ercial Developm ent
D E V E L O P M E N T P A T TE R N / B U FFE R IN G n/a= X

ap pro ved and e ffe ctive ly d e sig ned land scape d bu ffe rs betw een structure s and all roads 2
m inim al la n d sca p e d bu ffe ring , but co m p e n sa te s w ith exp an se o f land 1
m inim al la nd scape d buffering 0 4
no la nd scape d bu ffering, but utilizes exp an se o f land -1
no o r in ad equ ate bu ffe ring o r sep ara tion by land -2
Services - Capacity and Access
U TILITIES n/a=
a d eq ua te utilities ca p a city as evide nced by letter from each utility 0
a d eq ua te utilities ca p a city w ith o u t form al le tte r from each utility o r not from all utilities -1 4 -1 -4
in ad equ ate in fo rm atio n to d e te rm in e ad e q u a cy o f utilities -2
TR A F FIC n/a=
no im p act o r in sig n ifica n t im p a ct on curre nt tra ffic flow s 0
tra ffic flo w in crea ses exp ected but m an ag eab le using existing roads and road acce sses -1 2 0 0
tra ffic flo w in cre a se s exce ed cu rre n t road ca p a citie s -2
E M E R G E N C Y S E R V IC E S n/a=
structure size a n d /o r acce ss can be serviced by em e rg e n cy e q u ip m e n t 0
structure size a n d /o r acce ss m ay im pede but not hin d e r se rvice a b ility -1 3 0 0
structure size a n d /o r acce ss could be pro b le m a tic o r n o n-se rvicea ble -2

Page 3 of 5
The Battlefield Permit#: 15-18

Section Score
Performance

Importance
Division 111 Relative Policy Scoring Sheet:

Factor
Eastern Taney County

Score
Value
R IG H T -O F -W A Y O F EX IS TIN G R O AD S n/a=

g re a te r tha n 50 ft. rig ht-of-w a y 1
50 ft. rig ht-of-w a y 0
5 -1 .c.

40 ft. rig ht-of-w a y -1

less than 40 ft. rig ht-of-w a y -2

Internal Im provem ents
W A T E R SY S TE M S n/a=

central w a te r system m eeting DN R req uire m en ts fo r capacity, storage, design, etc. 2

co m m u n ity w ell / w a te r system m eeting D N R re q u ire m e n ts 1
private w e lls m eeting DN R req uire m en ts 0 3 2 6
private w e lls not m eeting any e sta blished stan dard s -1

in dividu al / p rivate w ells -2

E M E R G E N C Y W A T E R S U P P LY n/a=
fire hyd ran t system th ro u g h o u t d e ve lo p m e n t w ith a d e q u a te p re ssure and flow 0
fire hyd ra n t system w ith lim ited cove rag e -1 5 -2 -1 0

no fire hyd ran t system -2
P E D E S TR IA N C IR C U LA T IO N n/a= X

paved and de d ica te d w a lkw a ys (no b icycles) pro vid ed th ro u g h o u t d e velopm e nt 2
paved w a lkw a ys provided th ro u g h o u t d e ve lo p m e n t / m ayb e shared w ith bicycles 1
d e sig nate d w a lkw a ys provided but unpaved 0 4

no pe de strian w a lkw a ys, but green spa ce pro vid ed fo r pe de strian use -1
no d e sig nate d pe de strian w a lkw a y areas -2
P E D E S TR IA N S A F E TY n/a= X

sep ara tion o f pe de strian w a lkw a ys from roa dw ays by la n d sca p e o r structura l buffer 2
sep ara tion o f pe de strian w a lkw a ys from roa dw ays by open land bu ffe r 1 2
pe de strian w a lkw a ys ab ut roa dw ays w ith no bu ffe ring / protection 0
B IC YC LE C IR C U LA T IO N n/a= X

de dicated / se p a ra te b ike-w a ys w ith signage, bike racks, trails 2
bicycle la ne s sha red w ith pe de strian w alkw a ys but sep ara te d by m arkings / signs 1 1
no d e sig n a te d bike-w a ys 0
U N D E R G R O U N D U T ILITIE S n/a=
all utilities are pro vid ed u n de rgrou nd up to each building / structure 2
all utilities tra v e rs e d e ve lo p m e n t un de rgrou nd but m ay be above ground from e a sem e nt 1
utilities ab ove ground but / ove r d e sig nate d e a se m e n ts 0 4 2 8
utilities ab ove ground and not w ith in sp e cific ea se m e n ts -1
no sp e cific m a n a g e m e n t o f utilities -2

Page 4 of 5
The Battlefield Permit#: 15-18

Section Score
Performance

Importance
Division ill Relative Policy Scoring Sheet:

Factor
Eastern Taney County

Score
Value
Open-Space Density
U S A B LE O PEN S PAC E n/a= X

reside ntial d e ve lo p m e n ts (>25 units) in clud e m ore tha n 25% open recreational spa ce 2

reside ntial d e ve lo p m e n ts (>25 units) o ffe r > 10% but <25% open recre atio nal spa ce 1

recre atio nal area provided, but high ly lim ited and not provided as open space 0 2

no d e sig nate d re cre atio nal sp a ce provided, but open sp a ce a va ila ble -1

no open re cre atio nal sp a ce provided -2

Solid W aste Disposal
SO LID W A S T E D IS P O S A L S E R V IC E A V A IL A B IL IT Y n/a=
w e ekly se rvice is a va ila b le and do cum e ntatio n o f a va ila b ility provided 0
w e ekly service re p o rte d ly a va ila b le but not d o cum e nted -1 5 -1 -5

centralized, o n -site trash co lle ctio n rece ptacles a va ila ble -2
SO LID W A S T E D IS P O S A L S E R V IC E C O M M ITM E N T n/a= X

restrictive cove n a n ts provide fo r w e e kly dispo sal fo r each o ccu pied structure 0
services a va ila b le but not a req uire m en t d o cu m e n te d in cove na nts -1 5

not ap p lica b le / no pick-up service provided -2

Total Weighted Score= 0
Maximum Possible Score= 59
Actual Score as Percent of Maximum= 0.0%
Number of Negative Scores= 5
Negative Scores as % of Total Score= 14.3%

S coring P erfo rm e d by: Date:

Bob Atchley / Bonita Kissee-Soutee September 1, 2015

Page 5 of 5
Project: The Battlefield
Permit#: 15-18
Policies Receiving a Negative Score
Importance right-of-way / roads emergency water supply waste disposal service
Factor 5:
Importance stormwater drainage utilities
Factor 4:
Importance none
Factor 3:
Importance none
Factor 2:
Importance none
Factor 1:
Scoring by: Bob Atchley/ Bonita Kissee-Soutee
Date: September 1, 2015
Eastern District Relative Policies: Division III Permit

Project: The Battlefield Permit: 15-18
Max. As
% Total Negative Scores
Possible Scored
|Scoring 59 0 0.0% 5 31.3%

Max. As Negative Scores
Possible Scored Number of Percent
Importance Factor 5 5 -20 3 100.0%
se w a g e d is p o s a l

rig h t-o f-w a y / roads 5 -5

e m e rg e n c y w a te r s u p p ly 0 -1 0

w a s te d is p o s a l s e rv ic e 0 -5

w a s te d is p o s a l c o m m itm e n t

Importance Factor 4 32 8 2 28.6%
s to rm w a te r d ra in a g e 8 -4

a ir q u a lity 0 0

o ff-s ite n u is a n c e s 8 8

u se c o m p a tib ility 0 0

d iv e rs ific a tio n 8 0

d e v e lo p m e n t b u ffe rin g

u tilities 0 -4

p e d e s tria n c irc u la tio n

u n d e rg ro u n d utilitie s 8 8

Importance Factor 3 12 12
p re s e rv a tio n o f c ritic a l areas 6 6

scre e n in g o f ro o fto p eq uip

scre e n in g / w a s te c o n ta in e rs

s cre e n in g o f o u td o o r eq u ip

in d u s tria l la n d s c a p e b u ffe rs

rig h t to farm 0 0
m ix e d -u s e d e v e lo p m e n ts

e m e rg e n c y s e rv ic e s 0 0

w a te r s y s te m s 6 6

Importance Factor 2
re sid e n tia l la n d s c a p e bu ffers

rig h t to o p e ra te

re sid e n tia l priv a c y

tra ffic 0 0

p e d e s tria n s a fe ty

usa b le op en s p a c e

Importance Factor 1
a g ric u ltu ra l land s 0 0

b icy c le c irc u la tio n

Scoring by: Bob Atchley / Bonita Kissee-Soutee
Date: September 1, 2015
 .VillagVof Saddlfcbrook e %j

Merriam Woods

Merriam Wood
1Rockaway.Beach
u iiy "* f*
■*Forsyth

Branson

Kirtoyville

Hollister

Hollister

The Battlefield
Jefferson Road and Tracy Street, Branson, MO
Division III Permit 2015-0018
Taney County GIS - Beacon
 w *& m

‘-tKIFMbE-Yn

AF.jftVj'EiTtTEfcfe

S U N R IS E
US H W Y G'j
T H IS ;iS ,A N O U T E R R O A D
r . 'V “ - “ ' " r .r '*fc.

-1\ 0 X 3
H L ART,
M il! l i f e R E E K

LL*ER'

■ a p p i
 ilAfrAY.E;liTE

3 3 S i'JM 2 jg

OU IFR
US HWY 61>
THIS IS ANroUJERTROAD
dWVHJJO

WllIl?rCREEK

; 3 £ ^ TiY{

~t±^. sa - fiiiy'suf
I i ir t , _ //

SHARYjHllJg

EVERF.ST'

t iGQRRAtf
I m u s j a n g V a Ll

IRON H Q R S t
LOSTf.l KLE

SMRV i CRLFK

yvATLRLOO
 The Battlefield
Jefferson Road and Tracy Street, Branson, MO
Division III Permit 2015-0018
Pictometry - View from the North
 The Battlefield
Jefferson Road and Tracy Street, Branson, MO
Division III Permit 2015-0018
Pictometry - View from the South
 The Battlefield
Jefferson Road
and Tracy Street,
Branson, MO
Division III Permit
2015-0018
Pictometry - View
from the East
The Battlefield
Jefferson
Road and
Tracy Street,
Branson, MO
Division III
Permit 2015-
0018
Pictometry -
View from the
West
P roperty L o c a tio n :. v\ e f t P e - ^ O if V <
-------------- ~Tfcxr\/ fi-Vfe&V____
H earing Location: Tnncy County Courthouse
T im e :& 0 0 PM Date: VA ~
Phone: 417-546-7225
 11

L'MS
":-f
 TANEY COUNTY
PLANNING COMMISSION
DIVISION III SPECIAL-USE PERMIT
STAFF REPORT

HEARING DATE: Septem ber 14, 2015

CASE NUMBER: 2015-0015

PROJECT: W eddings at the Homestead

APPLICANTS: Jeff & Heather Michel

LOCATION: The subject property is located at 262 Collins Road,
Branson, MO; Scott Township; Section 31, Township
24, Range 20.

REQUEST: The applicants, Jeff & Heather Michel are requesting the
approval of a Division III Special-Use Perm it in order to
utilize their existing 97 acre tract of land for weddings,
com pany picnics, fam ily reunions, old tim e music events and
other gatherings.

BACKGROUND and SITE HISTORY:
The W eddings at the Homestead w ebsite indicates that the Michael Family
homesteaded the approxim ately 97 acre property in 1885.

The fam ily has recently restored an 1848 tim ber framed barn with help from the Amish.
The website indicates that the bridal cabin (circa 1888) has also been restored. Both
structures will be utilized in conjunction with the events that are hosted on-site.

The current application was approved for Concept on August 17, 2015.

GENERAL DESCRIPTION:
The subject property is a meets and bounds described tract of land containing +/- 97
acres.

The applicants are requesting Planning Com m ission approval of a Division III Special-
Use Permit, authorizing the use of the property as a rental space for a num ber of
functions including: weddings, com pany picnics, fam ily reunions, old tim e music events
and other gatherings. The W eddings at the Homestead website indicates that there are
many possible sites where large tents can be used for wedding ceremonies and
receptions. The barn is also available for w eddings and other events and may be
utilized for these purposes.

Division III Special-Use Permit Staff Report - W eddings at the Hom estead - 2015-0015 Page 1
REVIEW:

The applicants are seeking the Planning Com m ission approval of a Division III Special­
i s e Permit authorizing the use of the property as a rental space for a num ber of
functions including: weddings, com pany picnics, fam ily reunions, old tim e music events
and other gatherings.

The existing remodeled barn is a com pletely open space that may be rented for the
functions enum erated above. The W eddings at the Homestead website indicates that
sm aller w eddings may also utilize the two log cabins. This 97 acre site will further allow
for large outdoor and tented events.

The property in question is served by an existing drive off of Collins Road. The
applicants have indicated a parking area on the site plan directly north of the existing
shop building. The property also contains a large circle drive area. The on-site parking
performance standards of the Developm ent Guidance Code require, “ 1 space for every
3 fixed seats and/or 30 square feet of assem bly area without fixed seats.” The
applicants will have am ply space for parking on the +/- 97 acre tract of land.

The Bridal Cabin contains restrooms which are currently served by an existing on-site
w astewater treatm ent (septic) system. The staff recomm ends that the should the on­
site w astew ater treatm ent (septic) system shows any sign of failure that the system be
upgraded, repaired or replaced. Per State Health and Senior Services regulations, a
sepitc permit is not required via the Environm ental Division of the Planning Department
for tracts of land three (3) acres or more in size.

The adjoining property imm ediately to the north is prim arily vacant property and light
residential. The adjoining property im m ediately to the south is a home-based daycare,
with predom inately vacant and light residential properties being located further to the
south. The adjoining property im m ediately to the east is vacant property. The adjoining
property im m ediately to the west is Collins Road, vacant and light residential.

The project received a total score of -16 on the Policy Checklist, out of a maximum
possible score of 45. The relative policies receiving a negative score consist of right-of-
way on existing roads, em ergency w ater supply, solid waste disposal service and
utilities.

Division III Special-Use Permit Staff Report - W eddings at the Hom estead - 2015-0015 Page 2
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:

If the Taney County Planning Commission approves this request, the following
requirem ents shall apply, unless revised by the Planning Commission:

1. Com pliance with the provisions of the Taney County Developm ent Guidance
Code.

2. Com pliance letters from the W estern Taney County Fire Protection District and
the Environm ental Division of the Planning Department; including all other
entities which have requirem ents governing a developm ent of this nature shall be
provided to the Planning D epartm ent office.(Chapter VI-VII)

3. The W eddings at the Homestead has been approved as a Special-Use Permit.
Therefore the permit is specific to the applicant to whom the perm it is issued and
cannot be transferred without Planning Com m ission approval. The Special-Use
Permit shall not be used to establish com m ercial com patibility for or with any
future land-use change applications.

4. If the onsite w astew ater treatm ent system serving the W eddings at the
Homestead shows any signs of failure it shall be upgraded, repaired or replaced.

5. Prior to the issuance of the Division III Certificates of Conform ance (C of Cs), the
applicants shall first present a Certificates of Occupancy (C of Os) from the
W estern Taney County Fire Protection District for the buildings utilized fo r event
rental to the Taney County Planning Departm ent Office.

6. This decision is subject to all existing easements.

7. This Decision of Record shall be filed with the Taney County R ecorder’s Office
within 120 days or the approval shall expire (Chapter II Item 6).

Division III Special-Use Permit Staff Report - W eddings at the Hom estead - 2015-0015 Page 3
 \

f j } W eddings at the Homes!. x V W edd in g barn and recept x

C #li 3 https://www.weddingsatthehomestead.com

mm
Et ** ~ : n ■■ ■
' •, - ■ . |
H o rn ,.
So<*w888?
A bout

Packages

Pricing

C o n ta ct
 C d S https://www.weddingsatthehomestead.com/abouthtml

Packages

Pricing W eddin gs at The Homestead provides a rustic, yet beautiful setting for your
Contact special day. The Michel fam ily homesteaded these 97 acres in 1885 an d we are
proud to say that it still remains in the fam ily. Jeff and Heather Michel value
fam ily and the time spent together building memories. W e would love to share
the heritage of our special place with you as you branch off your fam ily trees to
become one and begin a lifetime of memories.

W e offer several locations on the property so that you m a y design the w edding
d a y of your dreams. There are rolling hills, flat grassy m eadows, a creek side
v alley an d of course an authentic 1848 timber fram ed barn. The b eau ty of so
m an y choices is that your w edding will be your own unique vision whether it is
a large outdoor or tented affair, barn w edding or reception, or a sm all intimate
/•vz-'i l- ln /-f " \" X /" /—
>■£ t / - \ V ns- ~v~ns~\ r> r*-> Vn 1 ✓--» o i i r v /-v 1" /-\ v> r> >-n ✓‘nv-x i /-> Vn 1r /-I v v \ T t a t i v
 W edd in gs at the Hom est' X A bout

h C i H https://www.weddingsatthehomestead.com/about.html

m an y choices is that your w edding will be your own unique vision whether it is
a large outdoor or tented affair, barn w edding or reception, or a sm all intimate
gathering. W e offer some possible suggestions for the scenic backdrop of your
w edding day.

Our fam ily has lovingly restored the 1848 timber fram ed barn with help fr om
the Amish. The back doors open wide onto our large hayfield to provide a
breathtaking backdrop for your w edding ceremony. The front faces the bridal
cabin, which has also been fully restored, circa 1888. This barn could be used for
the ceremony or you m ay choose to use it for a reception and throw open the
doors to dance under the stars!

You m ay choose a w edding in the holler, which is a perfect setting with a
sm all running creek and open m eadow . Surrounded by trees and bluffs as w ell a<
an authentic, restored cabin, circa 1860 s, fully equipped with a charming
outhouse. This little spot is heaven on earth and feels like you are hundreds of
miles from civilization.
n W edd in gs at the H o m e s t x A bout

https://www.weddingsatthehomestead.com/about.html

There are m any possible sites where large tents can be used for your
ceremony or reception with or without combination of the barn, depending on
your vision and the size of your wedding.

W e can also offer smaller w eddings with your choice of two log cabins. The
front porch m akes a charm ing backdrop for an intimate w edding and sm all tents
can be added to the m eadow for picnics or receptions if you choose.

The photo opportunities on this lovely property are endless. Local
photographers often use this property for their backdrops for senior and fam ily
photos. You will have pre-arranged access to the property for pictures if you
choose to have a photography session prior to the wedding.

W e are excited for the opportunity to share your special d ay and to share our
heritage with you. W e are currently booking for 2016, as we are finalizing the
bridal cabin and the groomsman's area, the restroom, and adding the final
touches to m ake your d a y memorable. Contact us to schedule a tour as w e w ould
love to share with you the work in progress. W e look forward to working with
H https://www.weddingsatthehomestead.com/abouthtml

ceremony or reception w ith or without combination of the barn, depending on
your vision and the size of your wedding.

W e can also offer smaller w eddings with your choice of two log cabins. The
front porch makes a charm ing backdrop for an intimate w edding and sm all tents
can be added to the m eadow for picnics or receptions if you choose.

The photo opportunities on this lovely property are endless. Local
photographers often use this property for their backdrops for senior and fam ily
photos. You will h ave pre-arranged access to the property for pictures if you
choose to h av e a photography session prior to the wedding.

W e are excited for the opportunity to share your special d ay and to share our
heritage w ith you. W e are currently booking for 2016, as we are finalizing the
bridal cabin and the groomsman's area, the restroom, and adding the final
touches to m ake your d a y memorable. Contact us to schedule a tour as w e w ould
love to share with you the work in progress. W e look forw ard to working w ith
you at the Michel Fam ily Homestead, where hearts and heritage come together!
 V* Ft i i t i p s . / / w v v w . v v e u u i i l y s a t u i c i i u i i i c i i c a u . L u i 1 1/ p n v - i i i y . 1 m i l l

Packages

****Grand Opening****
Contact
Special rates for a limited time

* * * * B o o f{ in 2 0 1 5 to f io f b th e s e ra te s fo r y o u r 2 0 1 6 w e b b in g * * * *

A ll pricing includes

Use o f our

• outdoor priv ate estate
• beautiful tim ber fram ed barn
• 33x25 dance floor
• log cabin b rid al suite
• groom sm an s cave
• rustic cabin in the boiler
• speaker system to plug in your device

The photo opportunities are endless a s w ell as unique''

• m eadow s, b a y fie Ids an d tree sw in g
• rustic log cabins, creek a n d w aterfall
• 1929 Studebaker sa w m ill truck
• 1946 fully restored C bev y pickup
C rtr f i https://w w w .w eddingsatthehom estead.com /pricing.htm l
• 33x25 dance floor
• log cabin bridal suite
• groom sm an s cave
• rustic cabin in the boiler
• speaker system to plug in your device

The photo opportunities are endless as well as unique ~

• m eadow s, b a y fields an d tree sw ing
• rustic log cabins, creek a n d w aterfall
• 1929 Studebaker saw mill truck
• 1946 fully restored C b evy pickup
• 1948 C bevy rat rod
• 19 5 0 C hevy 2 ton flat bed pickup
• 1929 Studebaker saw mill truck

Rental period is from 10:00 am to 10:00 pm. Use this time for decorating, wedding,
reception or sp ecial event. You have until 11:00 pm for clean up and rem oval of your item s.
You have an additional hour for reh earsal during the week prior to your w edding.

Up to 50 gu est................. $ 8 0 0 .0 0
Up to 100 guest...................... $1,200.00
Up to 150 guest.......................$1,400.00
Up io 2 0 0 guest..................... $1,600.00
Up io 2 5 0 guest.................... $ 2 ,0 0 0 .0 0
Up to 3 0 0 guest.................... $ 2 ,3 0 0 0 0
A bove 3 0 0 guest call for pricing
W e d d in g s a t th e H o m e s tea d P erm it#: 15-15

Section Score
Performance

Importance
Division 111 Relative Policy Scoring Sheet:

Factor
Eastern Taney County

Score
Value
W ater Q uality
S E W A G E D IS P O S A L n/a=

centralized system 2
on -site tre a tm e n t system (s) w ith a d eq ua te sa fe g u a rd s to m itig ate pollution 1
se p tic system o f a d e q u a te d e sig n and capacity 0 5 0 0
proposed system m ay not provide a d eq ua te cap acity -1
proposed solutio n m ay ca u se su rfa ce a n d /o r ground w a te r pollution -2
Environm ental Policies
S TO R M D R A IN A G E n/a= X

on -site sto rm w a te r reten tion and ab sorp tion w ith e n g inee red plans 2
on -site sto rm w a te r reten tion and ab sorp tion w ith o u t en g in e e re d plans 1
storm w a te r reten tion w ith m an ag ed and acce ptab le run -off 0 4

no sto rm w a te r retention, but a d ve rse im p acts from ru n -o ff have been m itigated -1
no a cce ptab le m a n a g e m e n t and con tro l o f sto rm w a te r ru n -o ff -2
A IR Q U A LIT Y n/a= X

can no t cau se im pact 0
could im pact but a p p ro p ria te a b a te m e n t installed -1 4

could im pact, no a b a te m e n t o r unknow n im p act -2
Critical Areas
P R E S E R V A T IO N O F C R IT IC A L A R E A S n/a= X

no adverse im p act to an y d e sig n a te d critical area 2
one o f the d e sig n a te d critica l are as im pacted but can be fully m itig ated 1
m ore than one o f the d e s ig n a te d critica l areas im p acted but can be fu lly m itigated 0 3
one o r m ore o f th e d e sig n a te d critica l areas im pacted and m itig atio n not fu lly effective -1
one o r m ore o f th e d e sig n a te d critica l areas im p acted w ith no a b ility to m itigate problem -2
Land Use C om patibility
O FF -S ITE N U IS A N C E S n/a=
no issues 2
m inim al issues, but can be fu lly m itigated 1
issues th a t can be buffered and m itigated to a re a son able level 0 4 2 8
buffered and m in im ally m itig ated -1
can no t be m itig ated -2
USE C O M P A T IB ILIT Y n/a=
no con flicts / isolated property 0
tra n sp a re n t ch a n g e / cha ng e not readily noticeable -1 4 0 0
im p act rea dily a p p a re n t / out o f place -2

Page 1 of 5
W e d d in g s at th e H o m e s tea d P erm it#: 15-15

Section Score
Performance

Importance
Division lil Relative Policy Scoring Sheet:

Factor
Eastern Taney County

Score
Value
S T R U C T U R A L S C R E E N IN G O F RO O FTO P E Q U IP M E N T & V E N T S n/a= x

no rooftop e q u ip m e n t / ve n ts o r blocked from view by stru ctu re design or screening 0
pa rtially blocked from view -1 3

exposed / not blocked from view -2
S T R U C T U R A L S C R E E N IN G O F SO LID W A S T E C O N T A IN E R S n/a= X

no on -site w a ste co n ta in e rs o r blocked from vie w by structure d e sig n o r screening 0
p a rtially blocked from view -1 3

exposed / not blocked from view -2
S T R U C T U R A L S C R E E N IN G O F O U T D O O R EQ UIP, S T O R A G E , ETC. n/a= X

no ou td o o r storag e o f eq uipm en t, m aterials, etc., o r o u td o o r w o rk are as 2
blocked from vie w by structure design 1
blocked from vie w using screening 0 3

partially blocked from view -1
exposed / not blocked from view -2
LA N D S C A P E D B U F F E R S - R E S ID E N TIA L n/a= X

appro ved la nd scape d bu ffe r betw een hom es and all streets / roads / highw ays 2
approved la nd scape d bu ffe r from m a jo r roads / high w ays only 1
m inim al la nd scape d buffer, but com p e n sa te s w ith exp an se o f land 0 2
no land scape d bu ffe r betw een residences and local streets -1
no land scape d bu ffe r from any road -2
LA N D S C A P E D B U F F E R S - IN D U S T R IA L n/a= X

approved la nd scape d bu ffe r from pu blic roads 0
m inim al la n d sca p e d buffer, but co m p e n sa te s with exp an se o f land -1 3
no land scape d bu ffe r from p u b lic roads -2
Local Econom ic Developm ent
A G R IC U L T U R A L LAN DS n/a= X

no con version o f C lass l-IV a g ricu ltural land to o th e r use(s) 0
d e ve lo p m e n t req uire s re cla ssifica tio n o f C lass l-IV a g ricu ltu ra l land to o th e r use(s) -2
R IG H T TO FARM n/a=
does not lim it existing a g ricu ltural uses / does not ca u se nu isa nce, predation 0
does not lim it existing a g ricu ltural uses, but m ay resu lt in m in o r nuisa nce -1 3 0 0
potential im p act(s) on existing ag ricu ltural land -2
R IG H T TO O P E R A T E n/a= X

no via ble im p a ct on existing in du strial uses by reside ntial d e ve lo p m e n t 0
potential im p a ct but can be m itigated -1 2
potential im p a ct on existing in du strial uses w ith no m itigation -2

Page 2 of 5
W e d d in g s a t th e H o m e s tea d P erm it#: 15-15

Section Score
Performance

Importance
Division i l l Relative Policy Scoring Sheet:

Factor
Eastern Taney County

Score
Value
D IV E R S IF IC A T IO N n/a=

crea te s >=5 full-tim e, yea r-rou nd jo b s ou tside o f recre atio n / re so rt secto r 2
crea te s full-tim e, yea r-rou nd and sea son al jo b s 1 4 0 0

cre a te s sea son al jo b s only 0
Site Planning, Design, O ccupancy
R E S ID E N T IA L P R IV A C Y n/a= X

privacy pro vid ed by structura l design, o r not a p plicab le 2
privacy provided by structura l scree ning 1
privacy provided by la nd scape d buffers 0 2
privacy provided by open spa ce -1
no a cce p ta b le or effective privacy buffering -2
M IX E D -U S E D E V E L O P M E N T S n/a= X

uses / fu n ctio n s are co m p a tib le o r not ap plicab le 2
uses / fu n ctio n s are in te gra te d and sep ara te d based on co m p a tib ility 1

uses / fu n ctio n s diffe r m in im a lly and are not readily ap p a re n t 0 3

uses / fu n ctio n s poorly in te gra te d o r separated -1
uses / fu n ctio n s m ixed w ith o u t regard to co m p a tib lity factors -2
C om m ercial Developm ent
D E V E L O P M E N T P A T TE R N / BU F F E R IN G n/a= X

ap pro ved and effe ctive ly d e sig ned la nd scape d buffers betw een stru ctu re s and all roads 2
m inim al la nd scape d bu ffering, but co m p e n sa te s w ith exp an se o f land 1

m inim al la nd scape d buffering 0 4

no land scape d buffering, but utilizes exp an se o f land -1
no or in ad equ ate buffering o r sep ara tion by land -2
Services - Capacity and Access
U T ILITIE S n/a=
a d eq ua te utilities ca p a city as evide nced by le tte r from each utility 0
a d eq ua te utilities ca p a city w ith o u t form al le tte r from each utility o r not from all utilities -1 4 -1 -4
in ad equ ate in fo rm atio n to de te rm in e ad e q u a cy o f utilities -2
T R A F FIC n/a=
no im pact o r in sig n ifica n t im p a ct on curre nt tra ffic flow s 0
tra ffic flo w in cre a se s exp ected but m a n ag eab le using existing roads and road acce sses -1 2 0 0

tra ffic flo w in cre a se s exceed curre nt road ca p a citie s -2
E M E R G E N C Y S E R V IC E S n/a=
s tructure size a n d /o r acce ss can be serviced by em e rg e n cy e q u ip m e n t 0
structure size a n d /o r acce ss m ay im pede but not h in d e r se rvice a b ility -1 3 0 0

structure size a n d /o r acce ss could be pro b le m a tic o r no n -se rvice a b le -2

Page 3 of 5
W e d d in g s a t th e H o m e s tea d P erm it#: 15-15

Section Score
Performance

Importance
Division 111 Relative Policy Scoring Sheet:

Factor
Eastern Taney County

Score
Value
R IG H T -O F -W A Y O F E X IS TIN G R O AD S n/a=

gre a te r than 50 ft. rig ht-of-w a y 1
50 ft. rig ht-of-w a y 0
5 -1 .5
4 0 ft. rig ht-of-w a y -1
less than 40 ft. rig ht-of-w a y -2
Internal Im provem ents
W A TE R SYSTEM S n/a=

central w a te r system m ee ting DN R req uire m en ts fo r cap acity, storage, design, etc. 2
co m m u n ity w e ll / w a te r system m eeting DNR req uire m en ts 1
private w e lls m eeting DNR re q uire m en ts 0 3 0 0
private w e lls not m ee ting any e sta blished stan dard s -1
individual / private w e lls -2
EM ERGENCY W A TE R SUPPLY n/a=

fire hyd ran t system th ro u g h o u t d e ve lo p m e n t with ad e q u a te pre ssu re and flow 0

fire hyd ran t system w ith lim ited cove rag e -1 5 -2 -10
no fire h yd ra n t system -2
P E D E S TR IA N C IR C U LA T IO N n/a= X

paved and de d ica te d w a lkw a ys (no bicycles) provided th ro u g h o u t d e velopm e nt 2
paved w a lkw a ys provided th ro u g h o u t de ve lo p m e n t / m ayb e sha red w ith bicycles 1
d e sig nate d w alkw a ys pro vid ed but unpaved 0 4

no pe de strian w alkw ays, but green space provided fo r p e de strian use -1
no d e sig nate d pe de strian w a lkw a y areas -2
P E D E S TR IA N S A F E TY n/a= X

sep ara tion o f pe de strian w a lkw a ys from roadw ays by la n d sca p e o r structura l bu ffe r 2
separation o f pe de strian w a lkw a ys from roadw ays by open land bu ffe r 1 2
pedestrian w a lkw a ys a b u t roa dw ays w ith no buffering / pro te ction 0
B IC Y C LE C IR C U LA T IO N n/a= X

d e dicated / sep ara te b ike-w a ys w ith signage, bike racks, trails 2
bicycle lanes shared w ith pe de strian w alkw a ys but sep ara te d by m arkings / signs 1 1
no de sig nate d bike-w ays 0
U N D E R G R O U N D U T ILITIE S n/a=
all utilities are provided u n de rgrou nd up to each building / structure 2
all utilities tra ve rse d e ve lo p m e n t un de rgrou nd but m ay be ab ove ground from ea sem e nt 1
utilities ab ove ground but / o ve r d e sig nate d ea sem e nts 0 4 0 0
utilities ab ove ground and not w ith in sp e cific ea sem e nts -1
no sp e cific m a n a g e m e n t o f utilities -2

Page 4 of 5
W e d d in g s at th e H o m e s te a d Permit#: 15-15

Section Score
Performance

Importance
Division ill Relative Policy Scoring Sheet:

Factor
Eastern Taney County

Score
Value
O pen-Space Density
U S A B LE O PEN S PAC E n/a= X

reside ntial d e ve lo p m e n ts (>25 units) in clud e m ore tha n 25% o p en recre atio nal spa ce 2

reside ntial d e ve lo p m e n ts (>25 units) o ffe r > 10% but < 25% open recre atio nal space 1
recre atio nal area provided, but high ly lim ited and not provided as open space 0 2

no de sig nate d re cre atio nal spa ce provided, but open sp a ce a va ila ble -1

no open re cre a tio n a l sp a ce provided -2

Solid W aste Disposal
S O LID W A S T E D IS P O S A L S E R V IC E A V A IL A B IL IT Y n/a=
w e e kly service is a va ila b le and do cum e ntatio n o f a va ila b ility provided 0
w e ekly service re p o rte d ly a va ila ble but not d o cum e nted -1 5 -1 -5

centralized, o n -site trash collectio n rece ptacles a va ila ble -2
S O LID W A S T E D IS P O S A L S E R V IC E C O M M ITM E N T n/a= X

restrictive cove na nts provide fo r w e e kly disposal fo r each o ccu pied structure 0
services a va ila b le but not a re q u ire m e n t d o cu m e n te d in cove na nts -1 5
n ot a p p lica b le / no pick-up service provided -2

Total Weighted Score= -16
Maximum Possible Score= 45
Actual Score as Percent of Maximum= -35.6%
Number of Negative Scores= 4
Negative Scores as % of Total Score= 11.4%

S coring P erfo rm e d by: Date:

Bob Atchley / Bonita Kissee-Soutee September 1, 2015

Page 5 of 5
P roject: W e d d in g s at th e H o m e s tea d

P erm it#: 15-15
Policies Receiving a Negative Score
Importance right-of-way / roads emergency water supply waste disposal service
Factor 5:
Importance utilities
Factor 4:
Importance none
Factor 3:
Importance none
Factor 2:
Importance none
Factor 1:
Scoring by: Bob Atchley / Bonita Kissee-Soutee
Date: September 1, 2015
Eastern District Relative Policies: Division III Permit

Project: W e d d in g s at th e H o m es tea d P erm it: 15 -15
Max. As
% Total Negative Scores
Possible Scored
|Scoring 45 -16 -35.6% 4 33.3%

Max. As Neaative Scores
Possible Scored Number of Percent
Importance Factor 5 5 -20 3 100.0%
se w a g e d is p o s a l

rig h t-o f-w a y / ro ads 5 -5

e m e rg e n c y w a te r s u p p ly 0 -10

w a s te d is p o s a l s e rv ic e 0 -5

w a s te d is p o s a l c o m m itm e n t

Importance Factor 4 24 4 1 20.0%
s to rm w a te r d ra in a g e

a ir q u a lity

o ff-s ite n u is a n c e s 8 8

use c o m p a tib ility 0 0

d iv e rs ific a tio n 8 0

d e v e lo p m e n t b u ffe rin g

u tilities 0 -4

p e d e s tria n c irc u la tio n

un d e rg ro u n d u tilitie s 8 0

Importance Factor 3
pre s e rv a tio n o f c ritic a l areas

scre e n in g o f ro o fto p eq uip

scre e n in g / w a s te c o n ta in e rs

s c re e n in g o f o u td o o r eq u ip

in d u s tria l la n d s c a p e bu ffers

rig h t to farm 0 0

m ix e d -u s e d e v e lo p m e n ts

e m e rg e n c y s e rv ic e s 0 0

w a te r s y s te m s 6 0

Importance Factor 2
re sid e n tia l la n d s c a p e bu ffers

rig h t to o p erate

re sid e n tia l p riva cy

tra ffic 0 0

p e d e s tria n s a fe ty

usa b le op en sp a ce

Importance Factor 1
a g ric u ltu ra l land s

b icy c le c irc u la tio n

Scoring by: Bob Atchley / Bonita Kissee-Soutee
Date: S e p te m b e r 1, 2015
 N

Weddings at the Homestead v^ e
'
 -V 111 KI - >f S u ld lr l M X ik r -■ **■

jL;
$(&**■
p ^ ; 4 „ ^$S ^ ? n ^ w W r4 « ' v d * iv ' ■■*•> 4 A il _ l* C Z T

ft ■ Y *# *

- .. & -» * V ^ w *
..... ■ * & ?
- .' • „ t f iln ri ,;im Woods. •_
'»/*«•■ .;V 4 S « a S 6 > - " » . . ..„>• « - A i a f c ^ w JT*

! ?Rock,T.vay B e o c h lk fjd f

I V-'**"' ’,. Vfc|,
* Ita tfJ R n ftx .
O i i ^ U - o " :. w j ' jM & ' * ^■’£ '*v '*'U. /* ■ ' '" MVS - 4 ^ p W
y* * * » a . , ^fsuH**
: *& M. *5.4* ... u. .
•" f j K , B i in ::•«'!m ■ / •■, ,*J. -/-[

i» j ,iii< . F * » v ^ .. *, r * ^ > . a , - - v S ^ ic S - . '4 *

W j w m / f > * i

/&
■ u-
iSL:
:- * Jr BC Sw R
* f S
i 1
’ iB sc ^ tir S M S i J *
7 , > ___

R L , ra E H M l ■ * * \ j ' % , ^ v a : * ”!^ v A
> ? • -•%,% '■>/'- T T ? * V i 5 » ' * » * ; . f'- x
•■^SraES w t f W i V &

^■> i <f* . r<» *.. f < m»1 ’ - 1 :1 & M c '' M
i" ''■■';>/ • 'r / < 4 ’2 $ * j & $ '\

Weddings at the Homestead
262 Collins Road, Branson, MO
Division III Permit 2015-0015
Taney County GIS - Beacon
^ B e a c o n Taney County, MO

Search Comp Search Results Comp Results Report

U SB

Bull Creek •• * •!» « 5 ? > !
Merriam Woods

Rock aw ay. Beach

Bran son
 ;TRUMA'N S HAY. B LIN

HORN
M-TN-GHOVL-

IlkS'IDL.

L '! IW 'Y*Vg

iHIGKQ

HOBARjTi

■simm.o
PA N TH ER

W F A IT H :
 ------------- T

MINLS

7TTT
1320 ft a .
 Weddings at the Homestead
262 Collins Road, Branson, MO
Division III Permit 2015-0015
Pictometry - View from the North
 f e ‘ -m & l t *
* *'

P s & f iiit^ — -•

f r f W J r *

**€s®fci

Weddings at the Homestead
262 Collins Road, Branson, MO
Division III Permit 2015-0015
Pictometry - View from the South
Weddings at the
Homestead
262 Collins Road,
Branson, MO
Division III Permit
2015-0015
Pictometry - View
from the East
Weddings at the
Homestead
262 Collins Road,
Branson, MO
Division III Permit
2015-0015
Pictometry - View
from the West
 T h e Taney C ounty
P l a n n in g X o m m is s io n

p roperty Location:

Hearing L o c a tio n : Taney County C ourthouse
Tlm0:6 ;OOPM - \
Ph4ne; 417-546*7225

l»i1i\»Cou!.ii
"uVMHSXOUUIJlin
M r.,