P&Z Regular Meeting Packet

T a n e y C o u n t y P l a n n i n g C o m m is s io n
P. O. Box 383 • Forsyth, Missouri 65653
Phone: 417 546-7225 / 7226 • Fax: 417 546-6861
website: www.tcmeycounty.org

AGENDA
TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
MONDAY, MAY 18, 2015, 6:00 P.M.
COUNTY COMMISSION HEARING ROOM
TANEY COUNTY COURTHOUSE

Call to Order:
Establishment o f Quorum
Explanation of Meeting Procedures
Presentation of Exhibits

Review and Action:
Minutes, April 2015

Final Votes:
Music City Motors
Shepherd Nightly Rental

Concepts:
Rosewood
Lakestyle Boat Dock Parking
410 Nightly Rental

Old and New Business:
Tentative

Adjournment.
 T a n e y C o u n t y P l a n n i n g C o m m is s io n
P. O. Box 383 • Forsyth, Missouri 65653
Phone: 417 546-7225 / 7226 • Fax: 417 546-6861
website: www. taneycounty, orjj

AGENDA
TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
PUBLIC HEARING
MONDAY, APRIL 13, 2015, 6:00 P.M.
COUNTY COMMISSION HEARING ROOM
TANEY COUNTY COURTHOUSE

Call to Order:
Chairman Steve Adams called the meeting to order with eight Planning
Commissioners present. They were: Steve Adams, Dave Stewart, Randy Fogel, Rick
Caudill, Doug Faubion, George Cramer, Randy Haes, and Brad Lawrence. Staff present;
Bob Atchley and Bonita Kissee-Soutee.

Mr. Atchley read the public hearing procedures and presented the exhibits.

Public Hearings:
Bear Creek Wine Company; a request by Rebecca and Dennis Tate to add wine
making to their current business located at 1320 Keithley Road. Mr. Atchley read the
staff report and presented pictures, maps, and a video of the site. Mrs. Tate was
present to represent her request. No public signed up to speak. There was no
discussion. This project will be voted on Monday, April 20, 2015.

Branson Trails; a request by Kara Stauffer to operate a recreation based
development at 7318 St. Hwy. 248. Mr. Atchley read the staff report and presented
pictures, maps and a video of the site. Mr. Ronald Smith addressed questions from the
Planning Commission. Mr. Adams wanted #7 of the decision of record reworded to
show where the ATV riding is going to be and where the hiking will be on the property.
Mr. Smith stated the trails will have signs designating where each trail is and what they
will be used for. Mr. Stewart asked what the length of trails would be. Mr. Smith
answered approximately 40 acres. Mr. Faubion asked for a site plan designating where
the trails, camping, RV's, biking, and fairways would be. Mr. Smith stated he has a hand
drawn one. The Planning Commission asked that this be presented before they vote on
the request. Mr. Smith stated that he would not furnish the ATV's, the people would
bring their own. Mr. Cramer asked for an explanation of frisbie golf. The Commission
suggested eliminating some of the uses to make the project less dense. Mr. Faubion
discussed operating hours. Mr. Smith stated that the recommended hours of operation
would work for him. Mr. Haes asked if El Monte road would be accessed. Mr. Lawrence
discussed with Mr. Smith what his main objective is for the property. Mr. Smith stated
that it would be the car lot, disk golf and shop.

l
 Michael Hazard who lives the farthest from this property stated that with all his
windows shut and TV on, he can still hear the ATV's on this property. Ted Nightengale
lives at Emory Creek Ranch stated the he doesn't want to hear the ATV's from his
property. Ginger Mackiewicz read a statement concerning noise, wildlife, environment,
traffic, safety. Guy Ruddick discussed buffering for noise, and asked if the Planning
Commission approves this that they leave out the ATV's. Richard Combs who owns the
mobile home park adjacent to the property stated that the law enforcement had been
called regarding the ATV's and the noise. He also requested the ATV use not be
approved. He did not feel it would be right to ask the people who have lived there for
years to put up with the noise. Greg Pope who has a project down the road from this
spoke in favor of this request. He felt that it would be good to bring in more tourists.
Mr. Adams discussed safety of ATV's and hikers. Mr. Caudill and Mr. Stewart agreed
with Mr. Adams regarding the safety issue. Mr. Stewart stated that when people are
turned loose on ATV's they won't know where the property lines are and where they are
supposed to ride. Mr. Adams asked where the restroom facilities would be located. Mr.
Smith stated that there will be a restroom in the existing building and in Phase II there
will be additional restrooms constructed. Mr. Faubion asked if Mr. Smith was looking for
approval for all phases at this time. Mr. Smith stated that at this time he was looking for
approval for phase I. Mr. Caudill pointed out that it would be hard to know how many
people would be utilizing the restroom in the existing structure. The Planning
Commission agreed that they would have to have proof of adequate wastewater
disposal. Mr. Smith stated that on tournament weekends he would bring in portable
toilets. The Commission asked for the applicant to bring back a site plan and to move
the ATV use to a different phase for approval later. Mr. Smith stated that the noise has
been from private use. Mr. Haes would like to see the access to the El Monte Road
addressed in the site plan. He stated that this is not a county road. Mr. Stewart wants
to see the project reapplied for and to have another public hearing. Mr. Atchley stated
that at the regular meeting the Planning Commission should vote to approve, deny, or
table the project at the next meeting. Mr. Stewart suggested the applicant state how
many cars he plans to have on his lot. This project will proceed to final vote next week
pending a site plan be turned in before the meeting allowing the Planning Commission
to view before the hearing.

Empire Energy; a request by Tri-Lakes Petroleum to move an existing bulk
storage facility from 943 St. Hwy. 76 to the northwest corner of Sunrise Dr. and
Buchanan Road. Mr. Atchley read the staff report and presented maps, pictures, and a
video of the site. Eric Hodge represented the applicant and addressed questions from
the Planning Commission. Mr. Stewart asked where the water would come from, and
Mr. Hodge stated District #3. Mr. Haes stated that the road had been dedicated to the
public and the entrance has been made wide enough for trucks to make the turn, for
use by the transfer station. Mr. Caudill clarified where the property lines were and that
this was a better more compatible site for this use in his opinion. No one signed up to
speak. This project will proceed to final vote next week.

2
 Acacia Club Estates; a request by Teten Farms, LLC to develop a 34 lot single
family residential subdivision located at 2100 -2300 blocks of Acacia Club Road. Mr.
Atchley read the staff report and presented pictures, maps, and a video of the site.
Eddie Wolfe representing the applicant addressed questions from the Planning
Commission and public. Mr. Faubion asked if there was a traffic count off Acacia Club
Road. Mr. Haes said there was. Mr. Wolfe discussed the detention basin and that it
would be covered within the restrictive covenants and plat. Site distance was discussed
and Mr. Haes will meet with Mr. Wolfe on site. Mr. Faubion addressed the letter from
Great River Engineering and that they did not state there was adequate capacity. He
would like to see an updated capacity study. The wastewater system was discussed.
Brian Stafford discussed his concerns regarding traffic safety and site distance. He felt
that 15 different driveways would not be safe, and read a letter from Dr. Brian Wilson
of the public school system stating school buses would not be able to stop at all the
driveways. He reported that the people who live in the neighborhood ride bicycles, and
walk along the road. He presented a video of Acacia Club Road. Water pressure issues
were also concerns of the neighbors, as well as privacy, property values, wastewater
capacity, and sewer smell. Mike and Nancy Van Trump also voiced some of the same
concerns, and stated they have observed people driving too fast on the road and do not
feel it is safe especially for more driveways. They stated that their water pressure is not
good now. Water retention, and pond was also a concern of the Van Trumps. They
wondered about being guaranteed of the size of the homes. Frank Gary who lives
across the street stated that there are bicycles on the road, and he started doing his
own traffic count and did 12 hours of counting and there is approximately one car per
minute that goes by his house. He stated that the last person to build a house in the
neighborhood was turned down by the sewer district stating there was not capacity.
According to Mr. Gary the ditch fills with water when there is runoff. He stated that
there is a lot filled with asphalt waste and would like to see that removed. This road is
already busy and is showing a lot of wear and tear Mr. Gary stated. John and Jill
Hedrickson and her mother who live off Townsend and Acacia Club road voiced
concerns regarding water runoff, catch basin polluting the creek down below, traffic
safety, property values, restrictions on pets, sewer smell (the pump station at the
bottom of the hill), water availability, garbage cans, snow removal, and lots more
children. Kirk Coover who lives in the neighborhood expressed concerns regarding
runoff, sediment control, and water pressure. John and Janice Johnson who live three
houses down from this property expressed concerns regarding traffic safety for
children, wear and tear on the road, if approval is given would there be engineering
report and hydrologists survey so the property owners can review them, water runoff,
and drainage easements. Mr. Haes addressed the regulations regarding stormwater run
off and detention. Mr. Faubion addressed how a detention pond is constructed and how
it works. Mrs. Johnson also discussed the proposed size of the houses and prices
planned for those. Mr. Wolfe addressed the concerns and stated that the applicants had
contacted the County Road Administrator regarding the plans for the driveways off
Acacia Club Road in the very beginning of application. Mr. Haes addressed this and
stated that parking would not be allowed on the street Decause there is no room. Mr.

3
Caudill asked if it would be possible to construct an internal road within the
development and Mr. Wolfe stated no, and that they are not going to do anything the
Code does not allow. He also addressed the detention pond, impervious cover, and rate
of drainage. There are approximately 11 entrances on the other side of the street from
this, and Acacia Club road was not constructed to allow for pedestrian or bicycle traffic
in his opinion. According to Mr. Wolfe water runoff will be directed down the ditch
engineered and made better than it is now. Mr. Faubion stated that if he was a buyer
he would rather back his car out on a subdivision road rather than a county road. Mr.
Wolfe stated that would be too expensive for the developer. Mr. Adams asked if any of
the Commission wanted the applicant to bring anything to them before the vote is
taken. No one did. This project will be voted on next week.

Old and New Business:
Mr. Adams pointed out to the Commission that if they wanted they could take
this time to discuss various subjects. Mr. Haes reported on the conversation he had
with the developer and the representative before application was made for Acacia Club
Estates. Discussion also included compliance with the regulations and if an applicant
can comply does the Planning Commission have to approve a project. The Commission
discussed a plan being presented by the Branson Trails project.

Adjournment:
With no other business on the agenda for April 13, 2015 the meeting adjourned
at 8:49 p.m.

4
 T a n e y C o u n t y P l a n n i n g C o m m is s io n
P. O. Box 383 • Forsyth, Missouri 65653
Phone: 417 546-7225 / 7226 • Fax: 417 546-6861
website: www.tnneycounty.org

MINUTES
TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
MONDAY, APRIL 20, 2015, 6:00 P.M.
COUNTY COMMISSION HEARING ROOM
TANEY COUNTY COURTHOUSE

Call to Order:
Chairman Steve Adams called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. A quorum was
established with seven members present. They were: Steve Adams, Randy Haes, Dave
Stewart, Randy Fogel, Rick Caudill, Brad Lawrence, and George Cramer. Staff present:
Bob Atchley, and Bonita Kissee-Soutee.

Mr. Atchley read a statement outlining the procedures for the meeting and
presented the exhibits.

Review and Action:
Minutes; March 2015; with no additions or corrections, a motion was made by
Dave Stewart to approve the minutes as written. Seconded by Rick Caudill. The vote to
approve the minutes was unanimous.

Final Votes:
Bear Creek Wine Co.; request by Dennis and Rebecca Tate to add wine making
to their existing business located at 1320 Keithley Road. Mr. Atchley read the proposed
decision of record. The applicant was not present for the vote but arrived after the vote
was taken. Dave Stewart made a motion to approve based upon the decision of record.
Seconded by George Cramer. The vote to approve was unanimous.

Branson Trails; request by Kara Stauffer to operate a resort type business with
multiple uses located at 7318 St. Hwy. 248. Mr. Atchley read the proposed decision of
record, and presented the changes made since the last meeting, which included a new
site plan. Mr. Atchley reported that El Monte Road is a public road to a point, and from
the road to the State Hwy. is a private easement. The applicant was present to address
questions from the Commission and stated that he doesn't need to use the access from
El Monte. Mr. Stewart suggested stipulating the maximum amount of cars for sale that
can be on the property. Discussion followed with the decision by the Planning
Commission maximum of cars allowed on the property for sale as ten. After discussion a
motion was made by Rick Caudill to approve based upon the decision of record.
Seconded by Brad Lawrence. The vote to approve was unanimous.

Empire Energy Bulk Storage Facility; request by Tri-Lakes Petroleum to relocate
their existing business to property located at Sunshine Drive. Mr. Atchley read the
proposed decision of record. Eric Hodge was present to address questions from the
Planning Commission. Mr. Stewart discussed the grading, paving, tree line, and
buffering. Mr. Hodge stated that because of the topography, most of the trees would
have to be removed. Mr. Adams asked about distance from the south property line to
the county road. Mr. Hodge stated that it is several hundred feet, and that MoDot asked
if they could close the existing entrance, and he stated that they would. After discussion
George Cramer made a motion to approve based upon the decision of record. Seconded
by Brad Lawrence. The vote to approve was unanimous.

Acacia Club Estates; request by Teten Farms, LLC to develop a 34 lot subdivision
located off Acacia Club Road. Mr. Atchley read the proposed decision of record. Eddie
Wolfe representing the applicant addressed questions from the Commission. Randy
Haes reported that he visited the property and that comparing the plat from Mr. Wolfe
and the county map did not match up on the corners. He also reported that only two
lots did not meet the sight distance on driveways. Mr. Adams asked Mr. Haes if they
should table until these two items could be addressed. Discussion followed. Mr. Wolfe
stated that it would be a possibility that the County Map could be off and that they
don't use the deed or point of beginning when drawing the maps and that it plainly says
on the website that it is for informational purposes only. Mr. Caudill and Mr. Lawrence
felt the proposal is too dense. Mr. Haes said the County Road department took a 48
hour traffic count, and that it was a reasonable count considering the amount of people
in the area. Mr. Cramer stated that in his opinion there were too many driveways
proposed. Mr. Stewart also shared the opinions of the other Planning Commission. After
discussion Mr. Cramer made a motion to deny based on compatibility and safety. Dave
Stewart seconded. The vote to deny was unanimous

Concepts:
Music City Motors: a request by Hwy. 248 Group to add several new uses to the
existing business located at St. Hwy. 248. Eddie Wolfe represented the Hwy. 248
Group. Mr. Atchley read the request, and clarified that the previous approval did not
specify the added uses. There is also an issue with sewer and water which shall be
resolved before approval is given. Mr. Stewart discussed location. Mr. Caudill stated
that in his opinion that if there are going to be this many uses a restroom is needed.
Mr. Lawrence shared that opinion. This project will proceed to public hearing next
month.

Shepherd Nightly Rental; a request by Steve D. Shepherd to operate a nightly
rental business located at 290 Lone Pine Road. Mr. Atchley clarified the request and Mr.
Shepherd explaineO his request. He stated that he bought the property intending to
clean it up and sell it, when his wife wanted to turn it into a nightly rental. He wants to
recoup his renovating costs, taxes, and payments. He also wants to use it for his family
to stay in when they visit the area. Mr. Shepherd has built a new parking area in the
front to comply with Code requirements. He stated there are at least five other nightly
rentals in the area. He would like to have a special use permit so he can rent it when
his family isn't using it. There is a person locally who watches the place for him when
he isn't there. Mr. Adams asked for a letter from this person to be brought to the public
hearing. He stated that the marina is close enough for boats to be parked there. Mr.
Atchley stated that Mr. Shepherd has requested approval on this house before, but has
changed the request since that time. This project will proceed to public hearing next
month.

Old and New Business:
AmVets Club which is located in Rockaway Beach wants to open a second club
in an existing building located in Kissee Mills. They are renovating the building at this
time. Plans are for a bottle club for members only. The Commission discussed whether
this request should be heard as Division II I or Division II. Mr. Adams asked for a vote
for staff to run as a Division II. The decision by the Commission was to issue a Division
II permit.

The Commission discussed the posting of the public hearing notices and visibility.

There was other discussion regarding sewer and water issues at the Music City
Motors.

Adjournment:
With no other business on the agenda for April 20, 2015 the meeting adjourned
at 7:29 p.m.
TANEY T aney C o u n t y P l a n n in g C o m m is s io n
P. O. Box 383 * Forsyth, Missouri 65653
COUNTY Phone: 417 546-7225 / 7226 » Fax: 417 546-6861
website; mw.tuneyc& unty.wy

APPLICATION ¥OR CONCEPT
DIVISION III
/ Y l?

The Concept Application is for the use of the Planning Staff and Commission to
enable us to know the nature of the planned project. The official Division HI
Application for permit will be filed along with everything needed to complete
your file, as listed on the Division 111 Procedure Checklist, Division III
Applications: $150.00. Special Use Applications; $150.00.

NAME OF PROJECT: __________________ _ ____

NAME OF APPLICANTS 5arotK 'TV iX_i.
(Must be owner o f record)
-y , .
SIGNATURE: ^ DATEs OHlW j ItT
(Must be owner o f record)

MAILING ADDRESS: U>'T3 ,xY.yi T^fWe, . iYlf) I

T E L E P H O N E D U M BER : c m i ) M ° t - s '& B

Representative Inform ation

NAME OF REPRESENTATIVE:________ _ ___

MAILING ADDRESS (rep.):

TELEPHONE NUMBER (rep.

- if

Revised 12/19/03
 property Information

ACCESS TO PHOrcHTY (street # and name):

R o s e u jo o d O n v fe
n ip .

N u m b e r o f A c re s (o r **)■ ft- ®f l®t size): IS .S cQ Pvc'.ft'-S_________

PAHCEL #s ~ 5 „ 0 - 1U - D&Q - h QD - O \O - O D 1
(Parcel # MUST fe®©n pesmifc Sxaewgfe T&oos MOBfiirefeffiB' os ®os top Heft Etassdi earner ®f
property Sax sfcafememE. 0 y©6j Ssaw®waft paad feasses ow property, must: Saanra wareae off premow awmer stff propasfcy.]

SECTION: I If- TQWMSMlPs -V ^ RANGE; _j=i_

NAME OF SUBDIVISIONS (iff applicable)” D&jLf \oXl Q__________

Lot # (if applicable) BLOCiiC # _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

WITHIN 6©0* FROM THIS PROPERTY IS :
(Check all land uses that apply)

B^ommercial □Multi-Family ^Residential agricultural
□Multi-Use □Municipality

SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEpI:
□Treatment Plant mndivsdual
□Central Sewer: District # _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM^
□Community Well em vate Well
□Central: District # ___________

DOES THE PROPERTY LIE IN THE i© 0~ Y £« FLOOD PLAIN? □Yes sUlo

□ Residential □ Multi-Family ^Commercial' □Industrial
0 Special Use s''Other - Explain: f^p^cXaA :r.yt ,S

Revised 12/19/03
 A n y proposedproject that does not have a posted 911 address m ust be id e n tifie d
w ith a survey flag a t the proposed access to the property ,; Failure to post th e
survey flag w ill resu lt in a delay o f the P u b lic m ating. Please give a description o f
your proposed p ro ject including a ll uses: (IMPORTANT: M ake this description as
com plete as possible as your pu blic notice w ill be based on the inform ation
provided hereJ

vac w u a A \sVCp '\t: uS£ <xV^vx\tf\0^ o n fx.vr po>( s p g r j a-1

■
C M f ir f c . 9 f t v « l l . . ^ / - U i n u > U :r H n r M .g p y j C s u n h P Q£> ir m e
' . J o.
^ D .r^ c v ? ) P \ D ( i f ]a \ --------
' ’ I / ^ I .
fYx-AyM -g r o W f t k ; n ^ n A u / ) f r i l i cy O d-
rAavsCS " (j- >, Y^xc^vAft^ n, - w t if '>. j s m a44ll -fpu.ni>os
— ^ ,rr\vp\\r>a^ i ^
i M m r r-^vqn-tnvr-)^.. rC n4Vtfr M ac* r?P TQCCg
fY'. i VcA r, ri-^HiprTw. . Cjr/V' f i^ i n\"h i VinYU. (\ pVllAflini p :h_

^ A A O S fJa ri f A if e r Q ^ . w £ acp \ i4 / t U Y k V n W Q b L~g

4 n r o r A - 4 ^ o .^ n p e O S* C i Y Y iu B i p k f W ^ R v D fn

JV r c - \\ <a/-rV\ n°rh-^e-i^ „ IQ fc >-0>\\ D w :v v A \ fe f Y T > f t U > y
* ' J ............... J J \ \ I "
qV c(^njT\ mr\ yjoiW^^u^r hfljiAO. \nura t/ru/xi (.,_
\ut[TXx \ A s i M 4 U d V>^ir\i)K \ 0 ( i ^ __\ ' p p n « u^u
iW
U v ^ 11— 1— 1— -- ■ 'i \ y v | '
u \ il^ .'k ? W i\ x J g Q c ^ > \ x l a ) r Sh

a^ o w a A m . tt- )W V \ m - U f v r O P c f u n w m 't y s ^ Z ^ U K ia l^

\ (Xo\ vx> er 4 Vy* n 3 b \^lnu:Ws , vY\,u> Yu\ icMrh__ iS
^ A n n V p X r \ \ m t f s V A i^ d \ u e p d fY nPpU A 1 .5 0 ^ ^ -

V>X\\d^ ^ j Y^Ci V T Y ^ U T k I I kX -C Revised 12/19/03

AW a + ^ D ^ a r o e l/ TWbuiW »06 iS an q g ^ ft f e
^ H oc ^ xA4m ^ i V\ CV^ eW

vo e s V c >C c^i\V f 3t>ve r ( k i 0 P t u \ ^ iVV\ ^ 11 ^ l^ lv € r .7
■'A<^rv\ o C - v t ^ e b u i l A ^ j 4 > tj o ^ r p ' e b o u a )y c x d ^ n c ^ u
( (\{Y \ f A P f £ C ( 0< Z
 l\
Rosewood ^ E
 APPLICATION FOR. CONCEPT
DIVISION III
TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION

The Concept Application is for the use of the Planning Staff and Commission to
enable us to know the nature of the planned project. The official Division III
Application for permit will be filed along with everything needed to complete
your file, as listed on the Division III Procedure Checklist. Division III
Applications: $150.00, Special Use Applications: $150.00.

NAME OF PROJECT: U i.& S 'fy k /W f Pa.rKi

NAME OF APPLICANT:
{Must be owner o f record)

SIGNATURE: __________ DATE: W /tr
(Must be owner o f record) C t>r\fen /c4 s
// /[ tU ikeSfy/?,
MAILING ADDRESS: A / l i A - f rHwyj W<Xyi __________
<W<Kie>n/ FL (T
TELEPHONE NUMBER:________________ *ff7~ ~ fa \

R e p re se n tativ e In fo rm a tio n

NAME OF REPRESENTATIVE: d ' / ’k ^ ^ X dJ ^ _________

MAILING ADDRESS frep.V M & AJ: /fero^x QUo^/ )b y^ ^
' Q 3 fa o X
TELEPHONE NUMBER (rep.): Y f 7~ ~ ___________

Revised 01/01/2010
 Property Information

ACCESS TO PROPERTY (street # and nam e): f/o ((& V ^

('jLctois Me s rre-ef Ph?i/v\ ^^9 /b>l/ouJ , Bbe t'yQ

Number of Acres (or sq. ft. of lot size): 50 ? /Vo ~ ^,ooo Sg. f /.

PARCEL 1 - 2 . 0 - 0 3 - 0 0 3 - ©Of - 0 / ? . O O Q
(This number is on the top left hand corner of your property tax statement)

SECTION; 3 TOWNSHIP; <2 I RANGE; ^

NAME OF SUBDIVISION (if applicable): f a it h * * P o \ ^ ________

Lot # (if applicable) ^ (__________ BLOCK # _________________________

W ITHIN 600' FROM T H IS PROPERTY IS ;
(Check all land uses that apply)

p Commercial Q Multi-Family ^ Residential □Agricultural
ady.iA.iiv4 (o{ □Multi-Use □Municipality
15 4. kdk-^ <kiK
SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM;
□Treatment Plant □Individual
□Central Sewer: District # _____________

WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM;
□Community Well □Private Well
C Central: District # ____________

DOES THE PROPERTY LIE IN THE 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN? □Yes 8 No

TH IS REQUEST FALLS INTO ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING
C A TEG O R IES ;

□Residential □Multi-Family □Commercial □Industrial
□Special Use U Other - Explain: j-xxr In f

Revised 12/19/03
A ny p ro p o sed p ro je c t th a t d oes n o t h ave a p o s te d 911 address m u st b e iden tified
w ith a su rvey flag a t th e proposed a ccess to th e p rop erty. Failure to p o s t th e
su rvey flag w ill resu lt in a d elay o f th e Public Hearing. Please g ive a description o f
yo u r p ro p o sed p ro je c t including a ll u ses; (IMPORTANT: M ake th is description as
co m p lete a s p o ssib le a s your pu blic n otice w ill b e b a se d on th e inform ation
p ro vid ed h ere.)

S e e d in g to ca rt

<fi\ L& r <£ ( -fp S u jyio r'f <x A euj

(X jo c2o hocif d o ck, Vfe.
Ce>rA_So f frtgiA-eefS r & v i'^ S ^>Ae___

/O' O'
______ s f i ' p S . / ^ t r e jy r e , v 't n e t Z - c*•>"> ^ b-e Y fr>

_______ ? s/>of9. 7~/g a J jo in ji^ i /o-f f 'b 'f

^’<?&-)h <x(pfrc(ij an c L M f o y z d f at

______s>oPporhf\q 4.4 bcxn.~f efocfi^ -

Ldk^eSfy/e <\($o o t^ e r o^clfo,\ t '/ty

(n 't (to t \ ,______________________________________ v

Revised 12/19/03
 Lakestyle Boat Dock Parking
HAPPY HOLLOW RD

w * f'

Sss!*W
,1'*>?.''• N .—

§

m
 4 ) fr - a ei t{ - 7 X 2 k

\L

APPLICATIQN FOR CONCEPT
DIVISION I I I
TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION

The Concept Application is for the use of the Planning Staff and Commission to
enable us to know the nature of the planned project. The official Division III
Application for permit will be filed along with everything needed to complete
your file, as listed on the Division III Procedure Checklist. Division III
Applications: $150.00, Special Use Applications: $150.00.

NAME OF PROJECT: Ajo£D± 1j V flLUQQll

NAME OF APPLICANT: lU n m S \ (\ m l/S rtcl____________
(Must be owner of record)

SIGNATURE: ,ft -HR n* ^_____________DATE: 4 12S / 1S~
(Must be owner ~ofrecord)

MAILING ADDRESS: 4 ID U i u j t o n f r W id p M r ir c r lf llf . H o b S l i 0!
a 1
TELEPHONE NUMBER:

R epresentative Inform ation

NAME OF REPRESENTATIVE: , 1 IWVl^. H.0 .K _____________

MAILING ADDRESS (rep,): HuCO.ft ^ L i A t ’ j Q c l I W fUt)liKlcl, - i t

TELEPHONE NUMBER (rep.): ~ l^ O D ________________

Revised 01/01/2010
 Property Information

A C C E S S TO P R O P E R T Y (street # and name): ~kIX1 ]w i Km ds

il K it u . \l \J V v v r i - iW k x c A g ie ,. M O io f y 1 ? f j

Number of Acres (or sq» ft. of Sot size): 1 ^ 5 TV\?___________

PARCEL #\ IQ - S . 0 - ^ tXr - COD ^ OPA . C C C___________________
(This number is on the top left hand corner of your property tax statement)

SECTION" ^D- TOWNSHIP. • >\_________ RANGE;

NAME OF SUBDIVISION (if applicable): I One, f c iM oSuiodiJ,Z(GA
U
Lot # (if applicable) 1o. i^Hc^C BLOCK #

W IT H IN 60Q? FROM T H IS P R O P E R T Y IS ;
(C h e c k ali land u ses th a t ap ply)

□ Commercial □ Multi-Family ^{Residential □Agricultural
□ Multi-Use / □ Municipaiity

SEW A G E D IS P O S A L SYSTEM ;
□Treatment Plant ^ Individual
□Central Sewer: District # ______________

W A TER S U P P LY SYSTEM :
□Community Well Private Well
□ Central: District # _______ 1

D O ES TH E P R O P E R T Y L IE IN TH E 1 0 0 -Y EA R FLOOD P LA IN ? □Yes □ No

T H IS R EQ U ES T FA LLS IN TO ONE O R MORE OF TH E FO LLO W IN G
C A T E G O R IE S :

□ Residential □ Multi-Family □Commercial □ Industrial
^ Sp ecial Use □ Other - Explain:________________________

Revised 12/19/03
Any proposed project that does not have a posted 911 address m ust be identified
with a survey flag a t the proposed access to the property,» Failure to post the
survey flag w ill result in a delay o f the Public Hearing. Please give a description o f
your proposed project including a ll uses; (IMPORTANT: Make this description as
complete as possible as your public notice w ill be based on the inform ation
provided here.)

r f r ___A tL __ ___________________

• !■
___usl____f e > n ______

___V A p t i u p ___ “f o g - ___ A F P u e w B L g ^ - ~Te>___ T w ^ - ___________

^ r g u c ^ u g jf e . ___ . A f r t o ___________ k l i LL. r lc V ______

\ tkxJU Q & . M A X___ <eacvfrVi*Ui ^ htspk v o c s l C q*- ^ u ?)

f e l W u g f r g y 8? * _______ _ _____________________________ __________________ __

Revisec; 12/19/03
April 29, 2015

Re: Short term rental @ 410 Newton Road

Dear Mr. Atchley,

We are submitting this application, for approval of the potential short term rental of an existing
single family residence, located at 410 Newton Road, in Ridgedale, MO, due in large part to the
on-going volatility o f the current real estate market. The proposed rental would include the
existing residential structure only, and will not include any existing boat dock (or boat slip)
privileges.

Given the current method of zoning followed by Taney County (“performance” rather than
“traditional”), I find it extremely difficult to justifiably establish a unified and consistent
precedent for approvals/denials of special use permits for short term rentals. Furthermore,
Longpoint Subdivision (originally platted in the early 1960’s), in which the referenced property
is located, is not located within any municipal city limits, is not incorporated, has no HOA/POA
or self-governing body, and has very few legal restrictions. In fact, a nearby single family
residential property located within 600 feet of the property reference in this proposal, was
recently granted a similar special use permit for short term rental.

If the application for a special use permit is approved, we would:

1. Respectfully comply with all common restrictions of the Guidance Code
2. Collect and report all required sales taxes
3. Limit the special use permit to the home owner, and/or owner’s representative as
shown on this application
4. Limit the maximum occupancy, propoxtional to the hom e’s size, to prevent potential
overload of the existing on-site wastewater treatment system and private well.

Considering the issues submitted herein, and assuming compliance with all provisions of the
Taney County Development Guidance Code as well as any additional requirements set forth by
the Planning Commission, we respectfully submit that the Planning Commission approve this
application for a nightly rental Division III special use permit.

Should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to
contact me at 417.294.4840.

Respectfully Submitted,

Dennis Beanland