P&Z Regular Meeting Packet

TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
P. 0 . Box 383 • Forsyth, Missouri 65653
Phone: 41 7 546-7225 I 7226 • Fax: 41 7 546-6861
website: ww1v.taneycounty.org

AGENDA
TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
MONDAY, DECEMBER 19, 2011, 6:00 P.M.
COUNTY COMMISSION HEARING ROOM
TANEY COUNTY COURTHOUSE

Call to Order:
Establishment of Quorum
Explanation of Meeting Procedures
Presentation of Exhibits

Review and Action:
Minutes/ November 2011

Final Votes:
Larimore Photography
Learn and Play Daycare
Spirit Hills Airpark

Concepts:
Country Park
American Sportsman Holdings Monopine

Old and New Business:
Code Amendments

Adjournment.
 TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
P. 0 . Box 383 • Forsyth, Missouri 65653
Phone: 417 546-7225 I 7226 • Fax: 417 546-6861
website: ww1v.taneycozmty.org

MINUTES
TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
PUBLIC HEARING
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2011, 6:00P.M.
COUNTY COMMISSION HEARING ROOM
TANEY COUNTY COURTHOUSE

Call to Order:
Chairman Shawn Pingleton called the meeting to order at 6:00p.m. A quorum
was established with seven members present. They were: Shawn Pingleton, Susan
Martin, Ray Edwards, Dave Stewart, Rick Treese, Rick Caudill and new member Steve
Adams. Staff present: Bob Atchley and Bonita Kissee.

Mr. Atchley read a statement outlining the procedures for the meeting and
presented the exhibits.

Public Hearings:
798 Parkview Dr. Rental House: a request by Donald and Judith Haun for a
special use permit to utilize an existing single family residence for nightly rental located
at 798 Parkview Dr. Mr. Atchley read the staff report and presented pictures and a
video of the site. Mr. Pingleton clarified special use permit guidelines. Tammy Taylor
daughter of the applicant, gave a brief presentation of the request. She stated that Ken
Westfall who owns the property next door does not want a privacy fence along that
part of the property. The other property owners want a privacy fence next to their
properties. She addressed the parking situation, and stated that there is room for a
circle drive making it possible to turn a boat trai ler around. Tom Rankin who lives on
Parkside Dr. asked everyone to stand who were against the project. Most of the people
present stood up. Mr. Rankin reported on the other structure in the neighborhood that
did nightly rental without a permit and discussed that situation. He stated that the
neighborhood does not object to monthly rental but not nightly rental, and wanted to
know why the Planning Commission allowed this request to come before them. Mr.
Pingleton stated that anyone can apply for a Division III permit, and explained what the
Code states and the process. Mr. Rankin expressed a concern regarding enforcement,
and stated that other structures in the neighborhood were doing nightly rental without
permits. Buddy Burr who also lives on Parkview Dr. across the street, his in-laws also
live down the street. He is not against the request and believes people should be able
to do with their property as they see fit as long as it doesn't interfere with others rights.
There was a question about covenants. Mr. Pingleton stated that the Planning
Commission does not enforce private restrictions. Ms. Taylor stated that they are
looking for a three night minimum or weekly rental. Mr. Atchley stated that this could
be placed on the decision of record as a cond ition. Ms. Taylor stated that all their
rental properties are maintained well, they want to be good neighbors and not be a
nuisance. The house sleeps six people with two bedrooms and one bath, no more than
that amount of people will be allowed. The Hauns will not allow any abuse of the law on
any of their properties, according to Ms. Taylor. Mrs. Martin discussed the privacy
fence and Mr. Westfall's opposition to it. Ms. Taylor stated that this property was rental
property when she bought it. Mr. Treese asked where her other rental properties were
located and she stated they are in Springfield and this is the only nightly rental they
would own. She has a website advertising her properties. Further discussion followed.
This project will proceed to final vote next week.

Angel's Rest Gift Shop: a request by Phyllis Tate to utilize an existing 320 sq. ft.
building as a jewelry and craft business with most of the business being conducted on
line. The property is located at 407 Holstein Dr. Mr. Atchley read the staff report and
presented pictures and a video of the site. Mrs. Tate clarified her request and stated
that most of the business will be over the internet. Tuesday through Saturday 9:00 to
4:00 p.m. will be hours of operation. There will be 4 x 4 signs posted in two locations.
Flyers will be posted around town . She does not anticipate very much traffic. There was
one person in attendance who did not object to the request. This project will proceed to
final vote next week.

Verizon Wireless telecommunications tower: a request to construct a new 250'
self support tower on property owned by Rick and Rhonda Turner located off Church
Camp Road. Mr. Atchley read the staff report and presented pictures and a video of the
site. Gary Buster representing the Turners and Verizon, explained the request. He
stated that they preferred to co-locate, but it cannot be done because of the back taxes
owed on the existing tower. Mr. Treese asked how far it will be from the other tower.
Mr. Buster stated that it is farther than the guyed wires from the other tower. Mr.
Stewart asked if there could be a guarantee that when the tower is no longer used, that
it would be removed . Mr. Buster stated that in their contract there is a removal clause,
and that they would comply with whatever the Planning Commission requested of them
(Verizon). Mr. Atchley stated that a "tower remova l bond" could be inserted in the
Code. Mr. Stewart suggested placing an item in the decision of record about removing
the tower. Mr. Pingleton questioned #7, and stated that in his opinion, the Planning
Commission might not be able to enforce t his. Mr. Atchley stated that there isn't
anything in the Code covering this or towe r removal. The Planning Commission could
place these items in the decision of record. Discussion followed. No one else signed up
to speak. This project will proceed to final vote next week.

Old and New Business:
Mr. Pingleton welcomed the new member representing Beaver Township, Steve
Adams. Mr. Atchley gave a report on appointments to the Planning Commission and
that at the end of 2011, Big Creek Township wh ich is vacant at this time, and Susan
Martins position will be up for reappointment. Mr. Pingleton asked Mrs. Martin to think
about being reappointed, and let Mr. Atchley know if she wants to be reappointed and
he will let them know by email.

Mr. Stewart discussed why the tower that owes the taxes doesn't come up to tax
sale. Discussion followed regard ing the tower owners being in bankruptcy.

Next week amendments to the Code will be discussed. Other discussion followed
regard ing the signs at Parkside Dr., and other permitted nightly rentals.

Adjournment:
With no other business on the agenda for November 14, 2011 the meeting
adjourned at 7:09 p.m.
 TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
P. 0. Box 383 • Forsyth, Missouri 65653
Phone: 417 546-7225 I 7226 • Fax: 417 546-6861
website: www. taneycotmty. org

MINUTES
TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 21, 2011, 6:00 P.M.
COUNTY COMMISSION HEARING ROOM
TANEY COUNTY COURTHOUSE

Call to Order:
Chairman Shawn Pingleton called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. A quorum
was established with seven members present. They were Shawn Pingleton, Dave
Stewart, Ray Edwards, Rick Caudill, Rick Treese, Steve Adams, and Susan Martin. Staff
present: Bob Atchley and Bonita Kissee.

Mr. Atchley read a statement outlining the procedures for the meeting, and
presented the Exhibits.

Review and Action :
Minutes: October 2011: with no additions or corrections a motion was made by
Ray Edwards to approve the minutes as written, seconded by Susan Martin. The vote to
approve the minutes was unanimous.

Final Votes:
798 Parkview Dr. Rental House: request by Judy Haun to allow nightly rental
with a three night minimum from an existing structure located in the Poverty Point area.
Tammy Taylor was present to represent the project. Susan Martin asked about an
alternative in place of the portion of privacy fence next to the property owner that
didn't want a fence. Mr. Atchley stated that since this is a special use permit, the
requirement for the fence would be at the discretion of the Planning Commission. Ms.
Taylor stated that she would have up to two cars at a time. Mr. Caudill expressed his
opinion that this property was not intended for nightly rental when it was constructed.
Mr. Edwards agreed with Mr. Caudill, and stated that in his opinion there isn't enough
parking and that the Code doesn't allow for nightly rental. Mr. Atchley clarified what the
Code addressed regarding nightly rental. Mr. Pingleton and Mr. Treese also agreed.
After discussion a motion was made by Dave Stewart to deny. Rick Treese seconded .
The vote to deny was unanimous.

Angel's Rest Gift Shop : a request by Phyllis Tate to operate a gift shop from an
existing bui lding located at 407 Holstein Dr. Mrs. Tate was present to address

1
questions from the Commission. Mrs. Martin clarified that most of this business would
be over the internet. Mr. Treese asked if the closest neighbor objected, and Mrs. Tate
stated that he did not. Mr. Pingleton clarified the days and hours of operation. Mrs.
Martin also clarified the placement of the sign, and if the building had air conditioning.
Mrs. Tate stated that it doesn't but may have in the future. Mrs. Tate makes jewelry
and quilts and other things. Mr. Treese made a motion to approve. Seconded by Susan
Martin. The vote to approve was unanimous.

Verizon Wireless: request by Rick and Rhonda Turner to allow Verizon to place a
250' self support tower to sit inside a 100' x 100' compound along with equipment
shelter accessed from Church Camp Road. Gary Buster was present representing the
applicant. With no discussion a motion was made by Ray Edwards to approve.
Seconded by Rick Treese. Discussion followed regarding the other tower. The vote to
approve was unanimous.

Concepts:
Larimore Photography, Inc.: a request by Pamela S. Thomas to operate a
photography studio at an existing single family dwelling, 1708 Bee Creek Road. A
handout and power point presentation was presented by the representative. Mrs.
Larimore explained the location, chemistry, buffering, signage, processing unit, water,
electricity, trash service, and sewer. This business will not be in-home. There will only
be up to one or two cars at a time, unless wedding photography is done. Mr. Stewart
asked what the policy in the Bee Creek area was regarding hooking to City sewer and
annexation. Mr. Atchley stated that the City cannot force annexation if the customer
hooks to their sewer. Mr. Caudill asked about processing. The representative stated that
they will not advertise processing and that they are in the process of switching over to
digital processing. This project will proceed to public hearing next month.

Learn and Play Day Care: a request by Tonia Collins to operate a day care facility
from an existing structure located at 21047 US Hwy. 160. Mrs. Collins presented a
handout and a presentation of her experience, layout of the building and location. She
explained the parking and ingress and egress. Play area will be in back, with three
gated areas to enter the property and building. Security cameras will be installed. There
will be four children at first and after licensing is obtained there will be up to 14
children. Ages of children will be from infant to pre-school. Mr. Pingleton asked if there
were any other licenses required. Mrs. Collins stated that the building is licensed, there
is a state licenses for individual teachers, and fire district. This is strictly daycare no
over night. Mr. Adams asked about the road. Mrs. Collins explained the drive would be
in one way and out the other with diagonal parking. She has approval from the septic
inspector. Mr. Pingleton asked about ownership of the adjoining property being
separate, and asked that they be combined in order that the property not be sold in the
future. If they can provide required parking, this would not have to be done. Mrs.
Collins asked if they wanted to place a business on the other property if they could ask
for approval in the future. Mr. Pingleton stated that if they met the requirements of the

2
 Code. The applicant might add this use to the request and will meet with staff about
adding this. This project will proceed to public hearing next month. Mrs. Martin asked
where the fence would be. Mrs. Collins pointed it out on the drawing presented.

Spirit Hill Airpark: a request by Missouri Airparks, LLC (Tammy Warner) to
develop 1100 acres into a single family residential subdivision with a possible golf
course, airstrip, and tracts consisting of 5+ acres each. Eddie Wolfe representing the
request explained the location, roads, ingress and egress. There will be 148 lots with a
private airstrip, hangers for private use, septic tanks, possible golf course and wells. Mr.
Atchley stated that DNR approval does not need to be obtained for a subdivision on 5
acre lots. The hangers will be rented and the Commission wanted that added to the
application. Discussion followed regarding compliance with the Code on the other
subdivision owned by the applicant. This project will proceed to public hearing next
month.

Old and New Business:
Code Amendments: Public comment was taken first. Gail Myer spoke regarding
zero lot line common wall. He stated that financing for condominiums has all but gone
away and that if a project could be permitted as a duplex funding could be obtained. He
also asked if the County could be consistent with square footage with the City of
Branson in case some of them would be annexed, which is 8000 sq. ft. rather than
9000 sq. ft. Mr. Myer also discussed right of way difference, curb or ditch, and that the
Code is too simple on that, and might need to be different in most areas of the County.
This would be in case of sprinkler systems or other things. He discussed nightly rentals
in the County, and that the Commission might get some information from the lodging
association. Mr. Pingleton thanked him for his comments and asked that Mr. Myer speak
with his County Commissioner and asks him to move on the approval of the
amendments.

Jess Coker who lives in Stone County and owns businesses and real estate in
Taney County, owns a duplex looked upon as a condominium. He stated that the
present code places a burden on someone who wants to buy a duplex for financing
reasons. He feels that changing this rule would provide a boom to the county. Mr.
Pingleton encouraged Mr. Coker to also ask his Commissioner to move on approval of
these amendments.

Mr. Pingleton asked that the items the Commission could agree on be sent on to
the County Commission after tonight. Mr. Atchley read through the changes and stated
that from page four to page 12 were amendments that had already been agreed on by
the Planning Commission and sent to the County Commission. Each amendment was
reviewed and voted on individually.

Section 6.1.3; Mrs. Martin made a motion to accept as written. Seconded by Mr.
Caudill. The vote was unanimous.

3
 Table J-2 page 74, regarding buffering; a motion was made by Mr. Caudill with a
change of 25' throughout. Seconded by Mrs. Martin. The vote to approve was
unanimous.

11.1/11.2b and Appendix B regarding the Sewer District; Mrs. Martin suggested
changing the verbiage to obtain and produce, from ensuring to ensure. Mr. Caudill
seconded. The vote was unanimous.

Page 18 & 19 of 107, 5.1, 5.1.1, 5.1.3; Mr. Pingleton suggested on 5.1 change
in the forth point to 2 acres or greater, change 50' minimum in 5.1.3 to per current
road standards refer to Append ix L. Item 5, last line, and change Taney County
Regional Sewer District, to permitting entity. A motion was made to make the change
by Mr. Edwards. Seconded by Mr. Adams. The vote to make the change was
unanimous.

Page 7 of 107, 13 of 107 and 14 of 107; add 3.13.6; Mr. Edwards made a
motion to approve 3.13, including definitions, seconded by Dave Stewart. The vote to
approve was unanimous.

4.1.2b; a motion to approve was made by Susan Martin, seconded by Ray
Edwards. The vote to approve was unanimous.

Appendix L; a motion to approve as is by Rick Treese, seconded by Rick Caudill,
the vote to approve was unanimous.

4.1.3; a motion to allow the change by Ray Edwards, seconded by Rick Caudill.
The vote to approve was unanimous.

7.2 will be deleted and not sent to the County Commission.

Item 5 of page 107, this order must be adopted by the County Commission and
the Planning Commission will ask them to do this per staff.

Item 14 of Page 107, 3.11.6 delete this item. Rick Caudill made the motion
seconded by Rick Treese. '

4.1.1; to change; motion made by Susan Martin, seconded by Rick Caudill. The
vote to approve was unanimous .

. Appendix B second paragraph, delete, on 3 acres or more. Motion made by Rick
Caudill, seconded by Susan Martin, the vote to approve was unanimous.

4
 Appendix F; as is, motion made Susan Martin, seconded by Rick Caudill. The vote
to approve was unanimous.

Table 1; change two-family dwell ing to 8000 sq. ft. and 4 acres for duplex, per
instead of/, delete wells, motion made by Rick Caudill, seconded by Susan Martin. The
vote to approve was unanimous.

5.3.1; delete Taney County Regional Sewer District, motion made to approve
the change by Steve Adams, seconded by Dave Stewart. The vote to approve was
unanimous.

3.13.6; insert this new section: A recorded government document acknowledged
by all property owners that covers interest in the property included but not limited to,
insurance, utilities, building exterior and other common elements. Motion made by to
approve. Seconded by. The vote to approve was unanimous.

Staff will make changes and email to the Planning Commission before sending on
to the Planning Commission.

Adjournment:
With no other business on the agenda for November 21, 2011 the meeting
adjourned at 9:20 p.m.

5
 APPLICATION FOR CONCEPT
DIVISION III
TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION

The Concept Application is for the use of the Planning Staff and Commission to
enable us to know the nature of the planned project. The official Division III
Application for permit will be filed along with everything needed to complete
your file, as listed on the Division III Procedure Checklist. Division III
Applications: $150.00, Special Use Applications: $150.00.

NAMEOFPROJECT:~G~.~ ~ +~~~p~~~~~k~--------------------

NAME OF APPLICANT: f1 i J foil l-.1 'a n/Je -rf--u .s ~~ '(
~ (Mustbeownerofrecord)

SIGNATUR .~~ · DATE: IO-/f-1/
};r:h -t/t.R..i .·/t..,, . (Mustbeow_l]f3rq(£ecor:.d) r ~ J -r-(, Jlj . ' 200 I.
ov L- u nrvrJe._ /r) JL70AI -(it/fA::>I f..) ;fL-fC..?/1 _j ~ 11 1,0 I

MAILINGADDRESS: 8' LJ/ilouJ cT BtttYJ5&1?i fYlr;, 1/5 /R I?
I

TELEPHONE NUMBER: __4.:.....:\___:.
l_-l ::::.q_:_·t4...:;...-....::?..-
::..l
~O....:(__________________
) _

Representative Information

6/J/ ~ Jv'o / f't'
NAME OF REPRESENTATIVE: -=~~~~~---------------

MAILING ADDRESS (rep.):

TELEPHONE NUMBER (rep.): _...._[__
'/ -'- 7 ·__,):.L)_L/_·- !L.!o
/ _:_ g'f ~2__;
==- 0 _______________

Revised 01/01/2010
 Property Information

ACCESS TO PROPERTY (street# and name): I 1--1 YCL lt- Sf

Number of Acres (or sq. ft. of lot size): -=-
o -"-
, 3L..U...
R _ C<
_:. . .c:::.. .:r-. ..;..t_?.L.--_ _ _ __

PARCEL #: rJ~- Jf ,() ~ 1 7-()tJtJ-tJOtJ-o ;3, tJ !J 0
(This number is on the top left hand corner of your property tax statement)

SECTION: __._!-'-_
! _ _TOWNSHIP: -=
:2-. . L):.___
_ _ _ _ RANGE: _.:.._
;2....!.,_
} __

NAME OF SUBDIVISION (if applicable): ____,bC.~o~un~h.:~Y
. .,;.L-.!...~~CI.r:..__!f
..~..__ _ _ __

Lot# (if applicable)_~_ _ _ _ BLOCK # - - - - - - - - -

WITHIN 600' FROM THIS PROPERTY IS:
(Check all land uses that apply)

~Commercial ~Multi-Family - ~esidential ilJ"Agricultural
o Multi-Use o Municipality
SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM:
ffTreatment Plant o Individual
o Central Sewer: District# - - - -
WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM:
o Community Well o Private Well
o Central: District# _ 3"'------
DOES THE PROPERTY LIE IN THE 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN? o Yes [f(No

THIS REQUEST FALLS INTO ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING
CATEGORIES:

o Residential o Multi-Family r lommercial o Industrial
o Special Use o Other- Explain: _ _ _ _ _ __

Revised 12/19/03
Any proposed project that does not have a posted 91.1. address must be identified
with a su!Vey flag at the proposed access to the property. Failure to post the
survey flag will result in a delay of the Public Hearing. Please give a description of
your proposed project including all uses: (IMPORTANT: Make this description as
complete as possible as your public notice will be based on the information
provided here.)

Oo Lol: &' ccX?n/ty ~rk tktd at? eKt'slt1f lz~C($e

Revised 12/19/03
 Page 1 ot 2

Eddie Wolfe

From: "Larry Milton" <larry@branson.com>
To: "Eddie Wolfe" <ew@wolfesurveying .com>
Cc: "Jim T Cell" <jim@centralpro-am.com>; "Lianne BTC" <lianne@bransontourismcenter.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 12,201118:25
Subject: 121Yale

Eddie,

After making an exhaustive list of potential uses for 121 Yale,
I decided to submit this restricted list.
These uses will be much more palatable to my neighbor Janet and
these will really only be the desired uses for the foreseeable future.

Any alternative uses in the future will have to submit to the County/City.

Real Estate Brokerage Office
Residential/Commercial Sales
Residential/Commercial Leasing
TimeshareN acation Club Sales
Property Management
Escrow/Title Company
Mortgage Lender/Broker

Theater-Show-Attraction Ticket Sales
Lodging Sales
Vacatio·n Package Sales
Marketing/Advertising
Office/Administrative/Accounting
Visitor Welcome Center

Professional Uses
Engineering
Accounting
Barber/Beauty Shop
Counseling/Massage/Therapy
Dentist/Medical
Builder/Contractor/Sub-contractor
Attorney
Architect

Model/Display Showroom

Antique/craft/quilt/gift sales

(Please modifY the above as needed)

We are requesting 5 total parking spaces
3 employees

10/19/2011
 Country Park

•

-----· - . -.----
raw, _ _ .. _ , _ ,. _ _ _

-r...-.
.... __._ .-.·.... .
-- -..,_,.-
""·-.. ~-a. ... - . . . . -•

........
---. ---.--
-
.-9-b"
. ... _,__, ......
·------
- - .. eo ... _,,.._T._. .......
-""'~-
_ ..... _
---IC.doto
..._Oola.__, __
~...... Ootl .. ~- ..... . .........

~-
_ «
 APPUCATION FOR CONCEPT !
DMSION III .
TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMI.ION
;
;

The Concept Application is for the use of the Planning Staff ~nd Commission to
enable us to know the nature of the planned project. The qffidal Division III
Application for permit will be filed along with everything n~ed to complete
your file, as listed on the DMsion III Procedure Checklist. Division III
Applications: $150.00, Special Use Applications: $150.00. i

NAME OF PROJECT: Lot 45- Monopine
--------~---------------+------

NAME OF APPUCANT: American Spomman Holdings Co
(Must be owner ofrecord)

SIGNAnJRE: ~~ DATE:
(Must be owner ofrecord)
MAIUNG ADDRESS: 210 South Third Street, Bnmso~ MO 65616

TELEPHONE NUMBER: (417)334-8820
------------~--------~~----

Representative IDformation
NAME OF REPRESENTAllV£: Eddie D. Wolfe I Wolfe Surveying, lnc.

MAIUNG ADDRESS (rep.): 210 South ThirdS~ Branson, MO 65616 i

TELEPHONE NUMBER (rep.): _<4_17)_3_34_-8_8_20_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _+ - - - - -

~ 01/01/2010
I
 Property Information

ACCESS TO PROPERTY (street # and name): Lot 4S -~hale Drive

E911 address to be assigned.

Number of Acres (or sq. ft. of lot size): 76.51' x 115.07' <8.8~.01 square feet)
'

PARCEL #: 19-l.O..ll-<>04-00l-007.000
(This nurnbet is on the top left hand comer of your Pf1>Pertv tax statement)
SECTION: _ _ll _ _ _TOWNSHIP: _ _.::.2~1---~GE: 21.w

NAME OF SUBDMSION (if applicable): <muks Paradise '4nage

Lot # (if applicable).__4_s_ _____.BLOCK # ----=-11:......;-:~~---

WITHIN 600' FROM THIS PROPERTY ~;
(Check all land uses that apply) !
!

o Commerdal o Multi-Family fi Residential : o Agricultural
o Multi-Use · o Municipality ·

SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM: rlrot applicable
o Treatment Plant o IndJv14ual
o Central Sewer: District # : i

:
WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM: Not~licable
o Community Well o Private!WellI

o Central: District # !
i

DOES THE PROPERTY UE IN THE 100-YEAR FLOOD ~LAIN? D Yes [){No
I
'
IHI!i REQUEST fALLS lt{[O ONE OR MORE OF IH~ FOLLOWING
CATEGORIES: :
'
o Residential o Multi-Family o Commercial! o Industrial
D Special Use ctOther - Explain: Utility· \\l}retess Communica1io~ Facility
!
Any propotled projt!JCt that tkJes ntJt have a posted 9:1.1 addre$,s must be identlli«<
w
with a surwy Hag at th8 pn:JJ1(1S«< MX;1tJ$S the propttNty. Fa'(lure tD post the
SUI'fMY flag will lfJSIJit In II delay Df thtl Public Haring. PIINIGBig;ve II d.aipti()ll Of
yr:HJr propos:sdpmject including •II uses: {IMPORTANT: Ha/(eJ., thi$ description as
(XIIIIp/ete u ptMf/b/e as ytJUr public ntJiice will be ba$«1 on ttJ,e intonnation
provided here.) i
i

Utility use for a wireless telecommunications facility consisting of an 80' monop+ commwtications

tower and associated ,ground based equipment placed with a fenced ccmpound.

~ 12/19/f.B
i
 P.O. Box 230 Ridgedale, Missouri 65739

Telephone;. 417-334-2106
. 417-334-1570
Fax: 417-334-2022

November 7, 2011

Bob Atchley
Director, Planning & Zoning
Taney County, Missouri
207 David Street
Forsyth, MO 65653

Re: Ozarks Paradise Village, Lot 45, Block 11

Dear Mr. Atchley:

Please be advised that by the powers vested in the Board of Directors of Oakmont
Community Improvement Association, Inc., (the "Association"), pursuant to the Declarations of
Covenants of Ozarks Paradise Village (as contained in Book 181, Page 27, and Amended in
.Book 202, at Page 127, an9 in Book 251, at Page 15~0), the Board has consente9 to and
approved a change in use of Lot 45, Block 11, to allow for utility uses on said lot, including the
construction and operation of a wireless communications tower and related appurtenances, as
shown on attached Exhibit A. It is our understanding that such use also requires issuance of a
Division III permit issued through the Taney County Planning & Zoning Commission. Please let
us know if you need any additional information.

Board of Directors, Oakmont Community
Improvement Association, Inc.

sr= /lccL/.vPz=:-~
S~cretary of the Board of Directors ·
I

On Table Rock Lake: GOLF- SWIMMING- TENNIS- FISHING
 - ~---
--- "--"ot: ~tmL
'" ~SURVEY USED AS A BACKCROUND
GENERAL NOTES: WAG-01-N0-01-001

~
IS PROV1DEO BY OTHERS AND NOT 1. ELEVATION IS FOR REFERENCE PURPOSE ONLY.
'.
~~- -~ ---- PART C1' SHIVE-HATTERYS ~
0
~ EXISTING ' ~ RESPONSlBIUTY. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS.
~ . !8

~~~
PROPERTY/ ROW LINE
'-- ~ J. CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM WORK DONE TO OR ON STRUCTURE IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROVIDED STRUCTURAL - tii~
~- ANALYSIS SEPARATE FROM SHIVE-HATTERY ENGINEERED DOCUMENTS. .J ?=- ui
~· ~
4. ANTENNAS, COAX, SUPPORTS, & ETC. SHALL BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS. TOP OF
5
•~ 2
PROPOSED UNDERGROUND ANTENNA WILL NOT EXTEND BEYOND TOP OF LIGHTNING ROD.
UTILITY SERVICE ROUTE
TO EDGE OF R.O.W CAP & --._
STAKE CONDUITS,
COORDINATE w/ LOCAl>
~ COMPANIES ~- ~
'

'-
5.

6.
CENTERLINE ELEVATION NOTED FOR FUTURE CARRIERS ARE SHOWN FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY.

ACTUAL FUTURE CENTERLINES SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH AND APPROVED BY TOWER OWNER. FUTURE
ANTENNA AND MOUNTING PLATFORMS MAY NOT BE DEPICTED ON TOWER ELEVATION
:._! ~

~~ i
w: h
e ~ HI
I~ ~~
PROPOSED PAIR 6'
WIDE WOOD ACCESS
1i. OF AT&T MOBILITY ANTENNAS L!J ~ j~J
GATES, SEE DETAIL ~ ELEV.= +72' -0"± >::l!_
I~iU
1/A- 4 & A-5 '· '- I '-
PROPOSED UTILITY '

-...,
RACK, SEE DETAIL
3/A-3 & 2-3/E-J
Ci_ OFFUTURE CARRIER ANTENNAS
ELEV.= +62'-0"±
lfl ~ di
' '¥ ' ~
--~-~~~ L~~'!~- .w I

w
I cHECKm BY: JUD I
e __ AT&T MOBILITY ICE BRIDGE
& FRAMING, (BY OTHERS) COAX CABLE ROUTED INSIDE TOWER ,
PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATION ------.._

3
'! \
AT&T MOBILITY EQUIPMENT AT&T MOBILI TY ICE BRIDGE
_...- ...... SHELTER, (BY OTHERS) & FRAMING, (DESIGN BY
OTHERS) - - - - - - - . _

\ AT&T MOBILITY EQUIPMENT
SHELTER, (DESIGN BY
OTHERS) - - - - - . . .
PROPOSED
UTILITY RACK

PROPOSED 6' HIGH CHAIN
LINK FENCE w/
J-STRANDS OF BARBED
~ ~(~:~u~o'-o"± $ BIG CEDAR

X>CXDALEDIWE
~WOIIT.Jt
WIRE, SEE DETAIL 1/A-6
""""""""
"""""""'""""
N

EB 0 ~~~~~:.TOWER ELEVATION I[ .. 'A=2 I
 --~'- ~-------0c0~y B~HAffiRYS
AS0~~:~2:'~gT USED
--------IS PROI-1DED
PART a' SHII£
GENERAL NOTES:
1. ELEVATION IS FOR REFERENCE PURPOSE ONLY.
WAG - 01-NQ-01-001

~~~~
RESPCtJSIEilU~~~ ~
2. CON TRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS.

---"
~~•rnoo"O
,. ~ Ill

3. CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM WORK DON~ TO OR ON STRUCTURE IN ACCORDANCE ~TH PROV1DED STRUCTURAL : t;;~
ANALYSIS SEPARATE FROM SHIVE-HATTERY ENGINEERED DOCUMENTS.
-! ~~-
~ ~~
4. ANTENNAS, COAX, SUPPORTS, & ETC. SHALL BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS. TOP OF
PROPOSED UNO ROUTE ANTENNA ~LL NOT EXTEND BEYOND TOP OF LIGHTNING ROO.
UTILITY SERFI-1~EO W CAP & '----...__

:~
TO EDGE 0 ITS. 5. CENTERLINE ELEVATION NO TED FOR FUTURE CARRIERS ARE SHOWN FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY.

~6~~~~~~~~uw/l~~c~.._____
UTILITY COMPAN
6. ACTUAL FUTURE CENTIERLINES SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH AND APPROVED BY TOWER OWNER. FUTURE
ANTENNA AND MOUNTING PLATFORMS MAY NOT BE DEPICTED ON TOWER ELEVATION

>- 0 .
rV z §
w..- t
l!.J: • ~

e ~Hl
-.
..L
-~
~ ~­
PROPOSED P.AIR 6'
~DE WOOD ACCESS
I[ OF AT& T MOBILITY ANTENNAS l!.J ~j h
GATES, SEE DETAIL ELEV . ~ + 72'-0"± > ~ fd
I I F' < ---. . . "" ,...-m
I~ IH
1/A-4 & A-5

I[ OF FU TURE CARRIER ANTENNAS
ELEV.= +62'-0"±
U1 :: ~al
!OR.AwN 8V:-Ji.P :::J
§~ev:JIJoO I
e
COAX CABLE ROUTED INSIDE TOWER
PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATION----,

AT&T MOBILI TY ICE BRIDGE
& FRAMING, (DESIGN BY
OTHERS) - - - - - ,
AT& T MOBILI TY EQUIPMENT
E
SHELTER, (DESIGN BY
OTHERS) - - - - - . .
PROPOSED
UTILITY RACK

COMPOUND

BIG CEDAR
PROPOSED 6' HIGH CHAIN
LINK FENCE w/
3-STRANOS OF BARBED
SUPPORT FOUNDATION
~RE. SEE DE TAIL 1/A-6
(DESIGN BY OTHERS)---- -
"""""""'
la00rn1<U, t.IO ¥1:1~
fA.N(Y COtMTY
SE~PORT~

COMPOUND PLAN
N & TOWER
ELEVATION

EB 0~~~~~=- TOWER ELEVATION I[ ;::; I
Taney County, MO Obeacon™
Date Created: 11/29/2011

Parcel ID 19-1.0-11-004-003-007.000 Alternate ID n/a Owner Address BARROWS KEVIN
Sec/Twp/Rng 11-21-22 Class n/a C/0 FOGGY RIVER REAL1Y
122 SYMINGTON PLACE
Property Address DALE DR Acreage n/a HOLLISTER MO 65672
RIDGEDALE
District 50NX
Brief Tax Description OZARKS PARADISE VILLAGE LT 45 BLK 11
(Note: Not to be used on legal documents)

Last Data Upload: 11/29/201 1 12:58 :51 AM

/L ~ developed by
... ~ The Schneider Corporation
Schneider www.schneidercorp.com
Taney County, MO Obeacon™
Date Created: 11/29/2011

Parcel ID 19-1.0-11-004-003-007.000 Alternate ID n/a Owner Address BARROWS KEVIN
Sec/Twp/Rng 11-21-22 Class n/a C/0 FOGGY RIVER REAL1Y
Property Address DALE DR 122 SYMINGTON PLACE
Acreage n/a
RIDGEDALE HOLUSTER MO 65672

District 5CWX
Brief Tax Description OZARKS PARADISE VILLAGE LT 45 BLK 11
( Note: Not to be used on legal documents)

Last Data Upload: 11/ 29/ 20111 2: 58:51 AM

1/{ ~ developed by
... ? The Schneider Corporation
Schneider www.schneidercorp.com
 Lot 45 Monopine W+E
N

s

__
_""_. ___
r-::::::-:-:.::;,s:_Ei="'
""""""
....,_.,_.._.
....... __ _,....
--...,
... _..,..
-DtooCooo.oool)_ . . _ _ _,
_ _ ..
,.......,_ _
10 . .no.
-d _. _ _......_
. t-.~-­

-----c..-.--
---~·-·
--~=~=--