RFB# 201108-149 County Uniforms Bid Tabulation Form

BID TABULATION FORM
BID AWARD DATE; Monday September 26, 2011

BID FOR; County Uniforms

BID NUMBER; RFB# 201108-149
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY CURRENT # NOTES PRICE PER PRICE PER PRICE PER PRICE PER
EMPLOYEES
USING EMPLOYEE: EMPLOYEE: EMPLOYEE: EMPLOYEE:
(APPROX.)

Work Shirts
Work Pants
Jacket (Normally 2) 11 Sets 3 $4.84 $4.27 $3.85 $5.00
Work Shirts
Most employees
Jeans prefer jeans,

Jacket (Normally 2) 11 Sets 57 $5.06 $4.80 $4.30 $5.25
Work Shirts
Overalls Overalls NOT Available
Jacket (Normally 2) 11 Sets 22 $5.72 $6.14 $5.83 $N/A
Work Shirts
Carpenter Pants
Jacket (Normally 2) 11 Sets Open $5.06 $5.15 $4.45 $6.25
MATS
3 x 4 (Black or Gray) 8 N/A Weekly $2.50 ea. $1.75 ea. $1.00 ea. $1.50 ea.
3 x 10 (Black or Gray) 5 N/A Weekly $4.50 ea. $4.00 ea. $2.75 ea. $3.25 ea.
4 x 6 (Black or Gray) 1 N/A Monthly $8.75 ea. $2.65 ea. $2.50 ea. $7.50 ea.
(AIRPORT)

SHOP TOWELS
Red 375 N/A Weekly $.10 ea. $.06 ea. $.05 ea. $.09 ea.
ADDITIONAL
CHARGES
st

Set Up Charge -0- (Waived 1 30 Days)
N/A $.50 (Per Piece)
Name Emblems $.50 (Waived 1 30 Days)
st
$.75 $.50 $1.00 (Per Piece)
Dept. Emblem $.75 (Waived 1 30 Days)
st
$2.00 $.75 $2.00 (Per Piece)
Size Changes -0- N/A N/A Emblem Only
Preparation Fees -0- $.50 N/A ?
Service Fees (weekly) $1.95 (Per Stop) $1.00 $1.50 (Per Inv.) $7.95
Service Fees (monthly) $1.95 (Per Stop) N/A $1.50 (Per Inv.) ?
Yearly Increases 3% on Anniversary Date ? ? 2% on Anniversary Date
Avg. Weekly Cost $479.81 $469.64 $415.16 $510.00
Misc. Notes… Included Schedule No Narrative

Recommendation / Award: Subsequent to a thorough review of all submitted proposals and the completion of the above table, other employees who use
this service were conferred with after which the following consensus was reached. First we eliminated Ameripride due to the fact that they do NOT offer
overalls and their pricing is noticeably higher at first glance. Next Aramark was eliminated despite the fact that they appear to be the lowest on first
glance, due to the fact that they did NOT supply any form of a required written narrative per the RFB – to explain their replacement process. The
remaining Bidders are Cintas and Unifirst. Responses from both are very close but the unanimous consensus is a recommendation that we stay with
Cintas who has been our current provider. The main reason of which would be that we will avoid the costs and time delay to have name and department
emblems / embroidery work done by switching. We anticipated those costs prior to the Bid and would consider switching only if the overall savings were
great enough to offset them. Although Cintas is slightly higher than the lowest Bid the overall difference will not offset the necessary costs to switch. Also
the report back from end users is that Cintas has done a very good job. They know the stops and are always on time. After a brief discussion the
Taney County Commission voted unanimously to award a 3 year contract to Cintas. Thank you.

Ron Erickson,
Purchasing Dept.
Taney County Mo.
September 26, 2011