P&Z Regular Meeting Packet

TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
P. O. Box 383 • Forsyth, Missouri 65653
Phone: 417546-7225/7226 • Fax: 417 546-6861
lVebsite: lVlVHJ. taneycounty. org

AGENDA
TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
MONDAY, AUGUST 15, 2011, 6:00 P.M.
COUNTY COMMISSION HEARING ROOM
TANEY COUNTY COURTHOUSE

Call to Order:
Establishment of Quorum
Explanation of Meeting Procedures

Review and Action:
Minutes/ July 2011

Final Votes:
Jakes Lake Storage
Besser Corner

Concepts:
Callahan Dog Grooming
Greenridge Tri-Plex

Old and New Business:
Tentative

Adjou rn ment.
 TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
P. O. Box 383 • Forsyth, Missouri 65653
Phone: 417 546-7225 /7226 • Fax: 417 546-6861
website: www.taneycounty.01'g

MINUTES
TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
PUBLIC HEARING
MONDAY, JULY 11, 2011, 6:00 P.M.
COUNTY COMMISSION HEARING ROOM
TANEY COUNTY COURTHOUSE

Call to Order:
Chairman Shawn Pingleton called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. A quorum
was established with seven members present. They were: Shawn Pingleton, Randall
Cummings, Susan Martin, Dave Stewart, Ray Edwards, Rick Treese, and Rick Caudill.
Staff present: Bob Atchley, Scott Starrett, and Bonita Kissee.

Mr. Atchley read a statement outlining the procedures for the public hearing and
presented the exhibits.

Public Hearings:
Hickory Ridge: a request by Homestead Branson Properties to develop some five
acre lots to become phase 2 and 3 or Hickory Ridge Subdivision located at Chapel Hill
Road and Hwy. 160. Mr. Atchley read the staff report and presented pictures, maps
and a video of the site. No one signed up to speak to the request. Eddie Wolfe
representing the request addressed questions from the Commission. Mr. Treese asked
about the rest of the subdivision and Mr. Wolfe stated that it was developed except the
Hickory II project. This project will proceed to final vote next week.

Hickory II: a request by Homestead Branson Properties to create smaller lots
than Hickory Ridge to construct smaller homes. Mr. Atchley read the staff report and
presented pictures, maps and a video of the site. Mr. Wolfe addressed questions from
the Commission. No one signed up to speak. Mr. Wolfe stated that he would be
providing lot numbers to the staff later. He also reported where the lot lines were
located. This project will proceed to final vote next week.

Branson Sports Entertainment Complex: a request by Russell Cook to develop a
motorsports facility to include automobile, motorcycle, BMX bike racing, concerts, car or
other trade shows and associated food, retail and commercial uses located at 689 High
Mountain Dr. Mr. Atchley read the staff report and presented pictures and maps of the
site. The video was not shown as all of the Planning Commissioners except one, had

1
 been to the site. Tom Gammon one of the project team presented first and stated
what the project could offer the area. He stated that the male/female ratio to the area
was 40 % male and 50% female. The project would add much needed jobs to the area
in his opinion. Mr. Gammon introduced the project team members as follows; Bob
Stockdale presented the site plan and other ways of utilizing the property. He explained
that the location of the site makes the project compatible with commercial uses. Bob
Carlson discussed the master plan and seating and that the track is sunk into a "bowl"
to minimize noise. He explained they will have a "third party review" of their plans.
Curtis Grey discussed the events planned for the project and usage. There will be
20,000 to 60,000 people on race days which will not be every weekend according to Mr.
Grey. Spencer Jones discussed environmental aspects of the project. He explained the
stormwater plans, runoff, and usage of recycled material, wastewater treatment and
sewerage. They have met with the Regional Sewer District and will continue to meet
again until an agreement can be finalized regarding the plans. Mr. Jones also discussed
water and waste management and the plans for infrastructure improvements. Kip
Strauss discussed traffic impact, traffic management plans, and infrastructure
improvements. John Jaeckel discussed noise and presented an analysis. He pointed out
the noise changes from all sides around the project. The study showed what the
deCibels would be from the track to each subdivision surrounding the property. Mr.
Gammon discussed economic development. He stated that this project would add
business, but not enough the area could not accommodate or handle it. There will be
both full time and seasonal employees.

Bryan Wade representing Big Cedar and Blue Green Inc. presented a power point
presentation shOWing the business as a big part of the area providing jobs, and bringing
in over a million people per season to the area. He pointed out that over half of the
population of the county lives within the vicinity of this project. He explained all the
aspects of the business that exist in Taney County and what other things are planned in
the future. Mr. Wade reported that in the past the applicant did not finish some of his
projects and that this one did not obtain the proper permits when land grading began.
He then discussed the Development Code as it applies to this project, concerning;
height restrictions as it applies to the light structures planned; land use compatibility
and the request is not compatible with the surrounding area; noise study that was done
at the Emory Creek project, and other organizations around the country that have done
their own studies. He brought up various news articles addressing roads within the
project and discussions with MoDot. Other race tracks around the country which failed
were pointed out by Mr. Wade, and in his opinion there isn't enough information for this
project to gain approval. Mr. Wade presented a letter from Joe White also opposing the
project.

Tom Aley, president of Ozarks Underground Laboratory gave a presentation
regarding an evaluation of the environmental impacts this project would create. This
study was done for the Country Farm Estates property owners, and a copy was
provided to the staff and Planning Commission. Section 4.4.7 of the Taney County

2
Development Guidance Code was pointed out by Mr. Aley, as well as other sections of
the Code applicable to this request. Mr. Aley's study showed no flow within the channel
which means there is a losing stream situation and he explained the connotations of
that. He also explained a study he did surrounding the Talladega Speedway, and how
solid waste affected the groundwater in that area. He stated that this project would
have the same issues. He then discussed noise and that because the property is now
shaped as a bowl it would be like a megaphone effect to the surrounding neighborhood.
In Mr. Aley's opinion 2 to 4 miles away would be affected by the noise. He asked that
the Planning Commission deny this request and gave several reasons why. Dave
Coonrod who works with Mr. Aley, and was Presiding Commissioner for Greene County
in the past, posed questions to the Planning Commission regarding, if the request
complied with the Development Code. He pointed out that the applicant had not applied
for the land grading permit in a timely manner, and other infractions of the rules and
regulations of the Planning Department. Mr. Coonrod read a statement of the Master
Plan which addressed protecting the environment, and pointing out the applicant now
wants to amend their application. He also asked that the application be denied.

Keith Crawford, a property owner within the 112 mile radius of the racetrack,
presented a power point presentation regarding noise. He gave an analysis and
comparison of lawnmower noise, vacuum cleaner, normal conversation, jet engine, and
rock concert. He reported the Bristol Motor Speedway also has the same shape of
layout as this proposal, and that it is the noisiest race track in the circuit. He continued
to point out other sources of noise generated from the track such as the PA system,
crowd, exhaust systems from the traffic, car doors slamming. The noise level from Mr.
Crawford's house was measured as typically 40 db range with the stock car race as 60
to 70 db. He pointed out the section of the code 11.1.3 land use compatibility, and that
this request is not compatible with the area.

LoAnn Gardner, a local real estate agent, presented some letters and examples
from people who live around other race tracks across the country and how they feel
about it. The letters she presented were in favor of the track.

Tara Shipman representing the "tea party" of Branson MO reported that they are
in favor of the jobs the track will provide. They don't feel the noise would be a
nuisance, or the wastewater a problem. She continued to cover the various items which
in her opinion would not be a problem.

Connie Crawford asked about a cease and desist order served on the project
which was not conformed with. There was a time table placed on the property by the
County Commission for hours of work, which was also not complied with in her opinion.
She also discussed other areas of the country she has lived which had race tracks, and
football fields and other noise nuisances. She asked the question, if approval of this
project would be worth destroying 240 homes and lives.

3
 George Cristofferson another property owner who lives on the corner of 65 Hwy.
discussed how noisy the traffic is from the Highway and that he does not oppose the
race track.

Robert Rasmussen is in favor of the race track because he thinks it won't be any
more noise than the highway or the airport, and that Silver Dollar City also has a traffic
problem. Big Cedar Lodge in his opinion property owners were also against that when it
was proposed. He wants to give other people a chance to keep the revenue coming into
the County. He also stated that in his opinion noise goes up. If Taney County is going
to grow in his opinion we have to allow businesses to come in.

Harold Huffman a local contractor feels this is a great opportunity for jobs in the
area which are needed. He also stated that he has known Mr. Cook for years and that
even though Mr. Cook has been involved in some projects that didn't work out, they
were beyond his control and everyone makes mistakes. He has also been involved in
some that did work out.

Ken Baltz who lives in Cedar Creek spoke against the approval of the race track.
He pointed out that if the jobs were hired locally, those people would already live here.
He was concerned about the serving of alcohol at the facility and people driving
afterwards. He lived close to a race track previously and stated that the sound doesn't
only go up it goes all over. He was also concerned about the trees and hills being
destroyed.

A reSident of Omaha Arkansas who worked in Missouri stated that she had been
unemployed for 6 months and wanted the project to be approved for the creation of
more jobs. Don Everly was in favor of the race track.

Jack Tobin lived in an area previously, close to a race track, and reported that
the houses in the surrounding area had to have noise proof windows installed. He was
also concerned about wild life, traffic, wastewater, water, trees, and noise.

Tony Espy who lives on Fruit Farm Road in Hollister, had some information from
a person who worked with some popular bands doing sound, who stated that in his
opinion the noise would be great to the people who live there. He was also concerned
about air pollution, hours of operation, full time or part time jobs, water and
wastewater.

Eddie Coxie who lives on Fruit Farm Road reiterated portions of the Code
regarding compatibility to residential areas. He asked that if the Planning Commission
approves this request, that they mitigate potential problems before they start. He
discussed some projects the Planning Commission did not approve and the reasons why
they were not approved.

4
 Stacy Whitfield pointed out that some of the property owners would be given
passes to get to their homes, proving there will be a traffic problem. She stated that
this would mean visitors to their homes could not get there during times when events
were taking place. She was also concerned with water, wastewater, traffic and noise.
She also reiterated some other concerns that property owners had already discussed.

Judy Cornell had some of the same concerns as the others. Stacy Whitcomb is
her daughter and she is concerned with being able to get in to her house. She doesn't
feel that the creation of jobs is a fair trade to destroy the ways of life of others.

Glen Admundson who lives in Walnut Shade stated he is a race fan from way
back, and that he has seen some raceways succeed and some fail. He stated that
whatever decision is made by the Planning Commission that they don't violate anyone's
civil rights.

Tammy Pasco who lives close to the project is not in favor, and asked that the
Planning Commission protect the value of her home with their decision. She also
pointed out what the Code says regarding the Division III procedure and landgrading.
She also asked them if they would want it in their back yard.

Dale West president of a homeowners association reported that they are not in
favor of the request.
- - -
Wynn Simmons lives on Fruit Farm Road and not in favor of the project, stated
some of the same concerns of the other property owners, adding crime rates to the list.
She stated that they have already been living with the noise of the work going on, and
the dust from the grading, finishing with the statement that, their land is their future.

Dave Ward who lives in the area had a concern with traffic and how emergency
vehicles would access their property. He reported on a conversation with MoDot who
stated they had not met with the applicant. He suggested utilizing secondary roads to
handle the traffic.

Jim Ostwinkle agreed with the concerns of the other property owners. He lost his
home in Hurricane Katrina and came to this area to stay in a motel for 6 months. He
and his wife were told that his chances of selling his home here were slim.

Archie Pinnell who owns property 3/8 of a mile from the race track property
wants the option of more jobs in the county.

Terry Greeners who lives on Fruit Farm Road, stated that she must keep her
windows closed because of the dust from the work at the track. She is also concerned
with property values.

5
 Joe Duncan who lives on Whitfield Lane stated he is a racing fan, but is
concerned with noise, roads, traffic, and condemnation of property.

Michael Hill who is in favor of the race track, stated that this project is a win/win
situation because of the revenue, but had a concern with noise. He worked at a race
track for a number of years and stated that he wore ear plugs for years to work.

Debbie Boulware was in favor of economic diversity in the area and the creation
of more jobs, but that the jobs might only be part time, and the track might not be
successful. She stated that there are jobless people living in motels with children, and
that there could be a better way to create year round jobs. She wants something
approved that would benefit the whole county not just a part of it.

At 9:30 p.m. the Planning Commission voted to extend their meeting. Rick
Caudill made the motion to extend, Susan Martin seconded. The vote to extend the
meeting was unanimous.

Bev Burres was concerned about traffic congestion because she lived near a
track in Chicago. She discussed traffic coming from Silver Dollar City and other roads in
the county with a lot of traffic. She feels the quality of life will be destroyed for a lot of
residents. She asked that the Planning Commission not approve the race track.

Don Phillips, State Representative, stated that he was in favor of the house bill
#1008 which would open the door and pave the way for discussions wi'th MoDot. He
asked that the Planning Commission remember what affects one affects all of us.

Wayne Jones discussed the Johnny Morris letter and pointed out some
differences between the race track and Mr. Morris's business. Mr. Jones was in favor of
the project.

Landon Jones was in favor of the request because of the creation of more jobs.

Pete Tsahiridis who lives in the neighborhood stated that where Bristol is, there
is a high unemployment and crime rate. He pointed out the negative health rates for
the young and elderly. He stated that taxes would have to be increased to support the
track, and in his opinion a negative impact on the environment.

Pete Savell is president of an audio business in the area, he has installed most of
the sound systems in the theaters in Branson. He explained that some issues regarding
high frequencies in the past don't exist anymore, and that speakers are focused in the
direction of the audience. He pointed out the misconceptions of the noise of the track.
He was in favor of the track because he thought it would bring in more business to the
theaters.

6
 Elizabeth Jones was in favor of the request because she thinks the area is dying
and we need more jobs, and if we have to put up with more noise to get them we
should.

Lyle Rowland State Representative of the 143 rd District, stated that the request is
in his district. He feels this is one project that would create jobs in the area. He stated
that he is aware of the changes it would cause, but is still in favor of the request.

Ray Weter discussed house bill 1008 and that he is a race fan. He is in favor of
the track because he thinks this would create more jobs in a sensible way.

J. Michael Niner discussed national debt. He is in favor of positive growth.

Mike Dunn supports the race track because he thinks we need "things like this".

Ken Carter lives on Fruit Farm Road, asked that the Planning Commission make
sure the project meets the Code, and to think about the children who live in the
neighborhood.

Russ Rupert says it seems like fun to have a race track, but is concerned about
the noise, and traffic.

Todd Aeschliman serves on the Board at Country Farm Estates Homeowners
Association was concerned with noise, environment~ water supply, property vaiues,
traffic, and conflicting information from the representatives of the development. It is
their feeling that there isn't enough information provided for the Planning Commission
to make an accurate decision and this decision would determine the credibility of the
Planning Commission.

Bill Ramsey thinks the racetrack would be a great opportunity for the BMX racing
and Taney County which would prOVide good economic growth.

Jeff Holden who lives in Country Farm Estates stated that even though he lives in
the neighborhood is in support of the track because of the creation of jobs. He doesn't
think the noise will be that great.

Jim Stevenson representing realty executives and lives in Country Farm Estates,
feels the best equity a person has is in his home. He is in favor of more jobs but is
concerned with noise. He explained how many decibels of noise would decrease the
value of a sale of a home.

Ronnie Page columnist, who lives in the neighborhood is not in favor of the
project, and stated that the racetrack people are not bad people they just have a bad

7
 idea. His concern was noise and suggested giving the track a fine if they go over 60
decibels.

Myra Ward lives on Fruit Farm Road was concerned about the foundation of her
home and the noise from the races because she works at night. She is also concerned
about lives being negatively affected, and traffic.

Courtney Kirkpatrick who is a native of Stone County moved here because the
area was booming. He is in favor of the track because he does a face book page in
support of the race track. He says they have 622 followers. He would like the race track
to be built for the economy and jobs he thinks it would create. He was also
representing 80 other people in favor of the race track. He only had two people on his
website that opposed the race track.

Mike Long who lives in Shell Knob and currently works for Kansas Speedway,
reported on the number of jobs prOVided by that race track. He also stated that the
noise isn't as bad as some people say it is.

Mark Weiss supports the project and would like the Planning Commission to
approve it. He reported that the roads and interchanges were planned many years ago
and that the developer would not be taking any property away from anyone. He feels
that this attraction would create more jobs as well as more business for the many
theaters and restaurants and motels in the area. Many of the properties surrounding
race tracks traditionally rise in value according to Mr. Weiss. He stated that the .
interchanges are already planned and will be built.

At this point the Planning Commission directed questions to the representatives
of the applicant. The first question was from Mr. Pingleton who asked about the roads
planned for ingress and egress. Mr. Gammon and Mr. Jones addressed the question by
stating the number of cars per day and how this would affect the proposed interchange.
Two lanes must be open at all times according to MoDot.

Lori Beebe granddaughter of the applicant, and in charge of payroll for Mr. Cook's
construction business, stated that no dirt has been moved for two weeks. Hours of
operation are from 7:00 a.m. until 5:30 p.m. She also stated that her grandfather does
not live in Omaha Arkansas.

Mr. Pingleton asked about RV's being next to the property lines. Mr. Gammon
answered that a 10' high fence would surround the entire property.

Mr. Gammon stated that there will be family zoned seating to prevent problems.
There will be enough security to keep problems from occurring.

8
 Most events will be over by 10 to 10:30 at night. There might be three events
per month lasting until 11 :00 p.m. If a car race lasts long it will be called by 1:00 a.m.
according to Mr. Gammon. He stated that the cars on the track as well as the cars
coming to the race all have exhaust, which cannot be mitigated.

Mr. Pingleton asked how many jobs would be permanent and how many would
be full time. Mr. Gammon answered that they want all the local participation they can
get. The construction site jobs will be full time until the project is done. All other jobs
will be used locally if the applicants are qualified. The raceway will employ 40 full time
positions and several part time seasonal positions.

Rick Caudill asked if permits had been obtained for all dirt work. Mr. Gammon
stated that they are in the process of obtaining additional permits for the added work.
He stated MoDot would dictate the parameters of the roads. Mr. Caudill asked exactly
what the noise levels would be at a specific distance. Mr. Gammon answered that they
use the standard physical equations, and add topography. He continued to explain that
it is hard to figure on a track that is not complete.

Mrs. Martin asked about the credentials of the current staff, and the ripple effect
of the economy during construction and after opening. Mr. Gammon stated that they
are in the process of doing a full economic study which should be done in
approximately 4 weeks.

Mrs. Crawford stated that she has a video of work going on the property outside
of the hours agreed upon. Mr. Gammon stated that there is no cease and desist order
placed on the property, only a letter from the lawyer.

Anthony Gosslin who is part of the race track team, spoke in regard to the
integrity of Mr. Cook, and addressed some of the points made by the property owners.

Old and New Business:
There was none. Mr. Pingleton thanked Forsyth High School and support staff for
helping with this meeting.

Adjournment:
With no other business on the agenda for Monday, July 11, 2011 the meeting
adjourned at 12:00 a.m.

9
 TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
P. O. Box 383 • Forsyth, Missouri 65653
Phone: 417 546-7225/7226 • Fax: 417546-6861
website: www.taneycounty.org

MINUTES
TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
MONDAY, JULY 18, 2011, 6:00 P.M.
FORSYTH HIGH SCHOOL
MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM

Call to Order:
Chairman Shawn Pingleton called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. A quorum
was established with seven members present. They were Shawn Pingleton, Randall
Cummings, Susan Martin, Dave Stewart, Ray Edwards, Rick Caudill, and Rick Treese.
Staff present: Bob Atchley, Scott Starrett, and Bonita Kissee.

Mr. Atchley read a statement outlining the procedures for the meeting.

Review and Action:
'Minutes: June 2011, with rio additions or corrections a motion was made by
Susan Martin to approve the minutes as written, Seconded by Ray Edwards. The vote to
approve the minutes was unanimous.

Final Votes:
Hickory Ridge: request by Homestead Branson Properties to develop five acre
lots to become phase 2 and 3 of Hickory Ridge Subdivision located at Chapel Hill Road
and Hwy. 160. Mr. Atchley read the staff report again. With no discussion a motion
was made by Rick Caudill to approve based upon the decision of record. Seconded by
Rick Treese. The vote to approve was unanimous.

Hickory II: request by Homestead Branson Properties to create smaller lots than
Hickory Ridge to construct smaller homes. Mr. Atchley read the staff report again. With
no discussion a motion was made by Randall Cummings to approve based upon the
decision of record. Seconded by Rick Caudill. Mr. Pingleton questioned the
representative Jack Houseman about where the wastewater treatment plant would be
located. The vote to approve was unanimous.

Branson Sports Entertainment Complex: request by Russell Cook to develop a
motorsports facility to include automobile, motorcycle, BMX bike racing, concerts, car or
other trade shows and associated food, retail and commercial uses located at 689 High
Mountain Dr. Mr. Atchley read the staff report again with additions to the staff
recommendations #9, 10, and 17. Mr. Pingleton asked for a motion. Mr. Edwards stated
there were five items he wanted to discuss, and then made a motion to approve based
upon the decision of record. Rick Caudill seconded. Mr. Edwards discussed water and
sewer and that staff depends on the DNR guidelines and as far as he could see those
have been complied with. Traffic will be controlled by MODot and any discussion
regarding that will be between the developer and Modot. Mr. Edwards feels that the
guidelines set aside in the recommendations are enough to mitigate sound. He feels
that the jobs created by the project cannot be controlled by the Planning Commission;
however this project will bring in much needed jobs to the area. With all these things in
consideration, Mr. Edwards feels it would be a mistake not to approve this request.

Susan Martin stated that she has given serious thought to her vote and
addressed the following items; the traffic study was not sufficient in her opinion, and
would like to know more about that; the independent study regarding the site has not
been received as well as the impact study; the noise study allows "Wiggle room", the
project in Mrs. Martins opinion would not allow enough additional jobs to the area, site
excavation began under false pretenses and permits were obtained after the area had
already been disturbed, she also discussed the process of obtaining permits from DNR,
and Corps of Engineers, and County Planning and Zoning. She finished by stating that
she cannot vote in favor of the request.

Mr. Pingleton discussed the first paragraph of the development code, and how it
applies to this request. He also discussed the additional jobs for the 'county and that it
is a land use issue and they should look at compatibility. He pointed out that there is
already a race track project approved in the county. Chapter 2 off site nuisances was
discussed by Mr. Pingleton and if approval is given #9 should be given stricter
guidelines. He wondered who will implement the guidelines, and would like to see a fine
placed per decibel over the requirements.

Mr. Edwards stated that enforcement should be over seen by staff. Discussion
followed regarding enforcement and how would the project operate if they aren't in
compliance. Mr. Caudill discussed sound and if the rules are violated how it would be
regulated. Mr. Atchley discussed placing measures each time a violation occurs which
gives the owner/operator a certain amount of time to come into compliance. Mr. Caudill
feels this project will generate a lot of support jobs to the area, and bring tourists into
the area to help support the existing businesses. Mr. Cummings discussed the
governing body mitigating the fines and any rules placed on it should follow the race
track.

The motion to approve made by Ray Edwards representing Cedar Creek
township, is based upon the preViously read decision of record with additions as
follows: item #9; a fine of $5000.00 shall be levied per each offence over 68 decibels.
 The motion is seconded by: Rick Caudill.

The vote to approve is four in favor and two against, with the chairman not
voting. The Division III application was approved.

Concepts:
Jake's Lake Storage: a request by Resort Installation Systems to construct
storage units off Quebec Road. Mr. Atchley presented aerial photos of the site, and Jack
Houseman representing the applicant explained the request. Concerns regarding
detention area were discussed by Mr. Atchley. Other discussion followed regarding
access width and location. The project abuts a residential area. The Planning
Commission asked that more information be provided by the next meeting, including a
more up to date aerial map. This project will proceed to public hearing next month.

Besser Corner: a request by Randy Besser to construct an 8,070 sq. ft. bUilding
for light commercial, real estate office, beauty shop etc. located off St. Hwy. 76. Jack
Housemen also representing the developer addressed questions by the Planning
Commission. Discussion followed regarding location, uses, parking, sewer, water, and
compatibility to the surrounding area. This project will proceed to public hearing next
month.

Old and New Business:
Mr. Pingleton and Mr. Atchley reported on discussions with the new County
Counselor.

Adjournment:
With no other business on the agenda for Monday, July 18, 2011 the meeting
adjourned at 7:05 p.m.
 11_ i) \

APPLICATION FOR CONCEPT
DIVISION III
TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION

The Concept Application is for the use of the Planning Staff and Commission to
enable us to know the nature of the planned project. The official Division III
Application for permit will be filed along with everything needed to complete
your file, as listed on the Division III Procedure Checklist. Division III
Applications: $150.00, Special Use Applications: $150.00.

NAME OF PROJECT: _

NAME OF APPLICANT: 6Jlakn .
.. !__ "Ui:> Ua.k~
(Must be owner ofr1FfI.d

. SIGNATURE:~L6~-d,~O/l~ATE:
, 7·{3·aotL .
(Must be owner ofrecord)
Prof>e~ tUld \"e~S
MAILING ADDRESS: jlta 3 E. ~"I k', rhJvdle<1 m..Q...bS07q .
~~701 w N&¥Jo(eol'l Ave, (-,'f3) me.fuide LA 70001.
TELEPHONE NUMBER: d!1·5lf:h.J1ZlY + 504· 30- 113".
Representative Information

NAME OF REPRESENTATIVE: _\2N:.-~L 1?:::&Z-\ X

MAILING ADDRESS (rep.): 2--~bIN .CU2E.t== 1:£ .
E:1 ~ J tv'O t:S:l:3:1c~)
TELEPHONE NUMBER (rep.): «)tS-2:E25-Z__~\ \

Revised 01/01/2010
 Property Information

ACCESS TO PROPERTY (street # and name): _

q l 63 E-. S-rat e.. +-hAJ Lj '70) ~·I\'{o'dvil/Lejtv1D b5b"1-9
Number of Acres (or sq. ft. of lot size): 20 oe.-r-es
h\ -5.0-llo-CXXJ-CCO-02.Cf,COO CR-S.O-IIo-CClJ-un-
~ARCEL#: ·-5. 0·-\ lo-OCO- -01-cLC()'2- 02.Cl.CX)le
(This number is on the top left hand corner of your property tax statement)

SECTION: _--=-\......;::lo=-_TOWNSHIP: _'2._? RANGE: _L_O~_

NAME OF SUBDIVISION (if applicable): _---=N-f-t~A~ _
Lot # (if applicable) BLOCK # _

WITHIN 600' FROM THIS PROPERTY IS:
(Check all land uses that apply)

(§lffim~ Multi-Family Residential Agricultur
Multi-Use unicipality

SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTE,": .. ~
Treatment Plant ~dividyal/
Central Sewer: District # _

WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM: _ _
Community Well ~at~
Central: District # -_ -

DOES THE PROPERTY LIE IN THE 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN? Yes ®
THIS REQUEST FALLS INTO ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING
CATEGORIES:

Residential Multi-Family ~ Industrial
Special Use Other - Explain: _

Revised 12/19/03
Anyproposedproject that does not have a posted 911 address must be identified
with a survey flag at the proposed access to the property. Failure to post the
survey flag will result in a delay ofthe Public Hearing. Please give a description of
your proposedproject including all uses: (IMPORTANT: Make this description as
complete as possible as your public notice will be based on the information
provided here.)

Pcqn5ed ,peR) e-C+ 'to .\I{\ ':Da \ I Y 'lI(\CJ ud e-
liLX4 g(QCfD'W:("1 E:a\ DO nod d,cq 1al\\OIV'(j
tiS w~L\ o.s a.. 9+f- QOre.. dCY1 tyl:\\L.
tbs~)\'o\e fLtlu\Ce, adcU±)O\Ds: dcq-
I£:rnr-dirxycY:IWWSf/ 1 -t'tlrN'f'K'::> COOr\(.f.,T,
~t ::fci end \\ 1 Ct1roP~()ll oclc..:.-'- - -

Revised 12/19/03
 ,--,-!
I
_'_N~"ff~~~"\;YF' "£\e:W
," -- --~ --=-......., -
.'

."1
.'

I
.... -
.,,.~

......
. . . . .,. . . . . . . . . . !
......
'--...-.-.- < I'

!
+-

f
I'
I
.:;:.,

_.'
';',0'"
:"....
/

,l
I

_I_

i -I:t-
~ Ir-bu-i-\<'\-\f\-g-I I~~J
! ~/.-
~ *\
I
!I ~
_ _ _.1-1 ~
~ !~_~.i_~CJ__ ._~ _ . - _ . . .,. __...._.:_. ._._ ___"_.,,___...-L~._""

.
\1 - - ~ -rerce.d
cL t
0
-lj
ELj=t{'ee5 N
" 6 *b\l\\cOClrd
5
 ,--j-
I
~~-~ -.- ,,- ..- -..-

-
/ --
-~-~- - -- -

/
--~~

/"
I
I \
~//1
.
\ .

~
I
i
. --.

---...
..:-- ............
.............. -

./

..
./
I
./
/ i
I
-"

.- .--~

a.c..c.e$
CJo.:te --
I
0/, ~etL.'fi.~.~
L-n_,~,... ........._ · _ · ........ ~ ....... ~---=- ,. . . .
~-- ---.......--'_.~-..-...<~-- --"......-----------..~-.~-- . . . . . -~ .. . - _.
i

.
~ - -::. .fexx:.e.<i
cJ.. If'
0
-()
w=tt'ee5 N
".
'8
"5
*b\\ \\cOO.r d
,-
I
J- -

..,.
..."
/~
-~
I
I .E
//1 •

/

"~'.

"-.

-----., .. -"." .

a.c..e.e$
1
_I-

I
- CJo.·:Jre - I j

jhome I
;

- - - - - - " -"-.~-~~"-

- -:: {'exced
d: If'
-81 ~=:t('ee5 N
d ~ b\\\\t::OO..r d
3
 1- -
//1
...
\ ,.
~,i

~. .~'. metal '-'1 0CX] b;e.(d~
~ \)l.A\\d.\D ! ~~r9:':f~'(' . o.cc.e$
Ii - 'jo..:Jre -
r- .'.
"-- -' - -I
;
I
I ~
l
If Ihorne I f l~=~ Id ~ po.<"\LiV1~
\

_ _....0.-
~
~
a
_ _ _ _ ~_
'."5.
~f
r l'\L\\')9 .
'"" -~ , _ ._ _.._••, _ •••
\
• . ' , _ . _ . . . ._ .. •• , _ _• ._. , •

\-\\N'I Ito
0= C2-vv1ps\.tes
- - =- -re.f'C.e.d.
t
E:3: : tt'ee5 N
~b\l\~d
---------------------- ------------ - - - - - -

Last Oat? Upk,,{i: -1/22/20n 11:53:2B.P~1

~. developed by ~... developed by ~ develope
....
Sc~~ The S<IIneider Corporation ~ The Schneider Corporation Scr.",;(~ The Schn
 Jake's Lake Storage

DISCLAIMER
Taney County makeSeYerr etrort to produce and publISh
!he most current and accurale InJormation po~.
This ~ta is provided "as is~ without wamlll1ty
or any representation Of aOCUf;Jcy. timeliness Ot'
completeness. The burden for delermlning accuracy.
oo"1lleteneas, timeliness. merchantal>i!ity and titneu
(or or the appropriateness for use rest~ liOIety on the
requester The County makes no WlIrranties., Illprns
Of irrpleO. as 10 the use 01 the DaUl. Thelllare no
im~ied Wlrranties of men:hanlabltity or fitness for
apmiclJlrpwpo&e. Therequnterac:knowtedpe•• nd
acc:eptslhe Imitations of the De.ta. tncluding ltle led
thai the Dara is dynamic and Is in a constant state 01
maintenance. COfTIdXln and updata.
.... lW2OOO
 TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
P. O. Box 383 • Forsyth, Missouri 65653
Phone: 417546-7225/7226 • Fax: 417546-6861
website: www.taneycounty.org

APPLICATION FOR CONCEPT
DIVISION III
TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION

The Concept Application is for the use of the Planning Staff and Commission to
enable us to know the nature of the planned project. The official Division III
Application for permit will be filed along with everything needed to complete
your file, as listed on the Division III Procedure Checklist. Division III
Applications: $150.00, Special Use Applications: $150.00.

NAME OF PROJECT: ~ Cb:- ~~,¥=I>.,.. _
NAME OF APPLICANT~ Q~ --"- _
. . ~yust be owner ofrecord)
SIGNATURE: ~d DATE: 2 :J2- )I.
(Must be owner ofrecord)

MAILING ADDRESS: AID C!JJdJJI ~. *~ lli.m >&)(95]
TELEPHONE NUMBER: 417- a?JQ - 4S (r; q
Representative Information

NAME OF REPRESENTATIVE: riQ.J.JJlJ.l C1vwlQu~ QA
MAILING ADDRESS (rep.): --,>{~~
__~_0--,,'
:=.-- _

TELEPHONE NUMBER (rep.): 4\(- dQ <+ - S () d 7

Revised 12/19/03
 Property'Information

ACCESS TO PROPERTY (street # and name):

Number of Acres (or sq. ft. of lot size): --.J",d,..L..:::::~~h.W~~---L..("";-'~.:.:...b...::=:5~_
£
1'-:-.J\~~ PARCEL!i: 01- 3·0 - 6 S -606-00D - ()~ (. 60S
::;. (Parcd # MUST be on permit. Example: 00-0.0-00-000-000-00o.000. This number is on top left hand comenf
property tax statement. If you have not paid taxes on property, must have name of previous owner of property.)

SECTION: S TOWNSHIP: d-3 RANGE: O:-D
NAME OF SUBDIVISION (if applicable): _

Lot # (if applicable) BLOCK # _

WITHIN 600' FROM THIS PROPERTY IS:
(Check all land uses that apply) ,

o Commercial 0 Multi-Family '¢-ReSidential 0 Agricultural
o Multi-Use 0 Municipality

SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM:
o Treatment Plant '! 0 Individual
o Central Sewer: District # ~~,

WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM:
o Community Well 1ti1'rivate,Well
o Central: District # - - - -

DOES THE PROPERTY LIE IN THE 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN? 0 Yes ~o

THIS REQUEST FALLS INTO ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING
CATEGORIES:

o Residential 4rMulti-Family 0 Commercial 0 Industrial
o Special Use o Other - Explain: _

Revised 12/19/03
Anyproposedproject that does not have a posted 911 address must be identified
with a surVey flag at the proposed access to the property. Failure to post the
survey flag will result in a delay ofthe Public Hearing. Please give a description of
your proposedproject including all uses: (IMPORTANT: Make this description as
complete as possible as yourpublic notice will be based on the information
provided here.)

r "'

Revised 12/19/03
 Taney County, MO , I beacon™
Date Created: 7/27/2011

.u'·,

hfoe
o Parcels
Roads
~ Lakes
o Corporate Limits

-Parcel IO 09-3.0-05-000-000-081.005 Alternate IO n/a Owner Address ANDERSON RICK & LAURIE
5ec/Twp/Rng 5-23-20 Class nja 310aJRTIS DR
FORSYTH MO 65653
Property Address aJRTIS DR Acreage 1.65
FORSYTH
District 3CCX
Brief Tax Description PL 3 LT 3 SWSW4
(Note: Not to be used on legal documents)

Last Data Upload: 7/27/20111:29:14 AM
u r,-~~~*~W;~??-<r~:"
':~.!'~'i:,...ff:>$-;'i.~v~'; ..s'J,<,~.;:-,m~j._J"·"':iif~,.-9 .....

L~ developed by
~J' The Schneider Corporation
Schneider www.schneidercorp.com
 Besser Corner

DISCLAIMER
Taney County makes every e"ort to produce and publish
the most current and eCWf'lte information possible.
This data Is provided·u is· without warranty
or I")' representation 0' accuracy, timeliness or
completeness. The bYmen for determining aCC:Ul1lCY,
completeness,tlmellness. merchantability and fitness
for 01 the appropriateness for use resls solely on the
reql,lllster. The County makes no wammtlea, express
orl~~ed,astolhe use of the Data. There are no
implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for
a particular purpose. The reque5ter Ic:knov.1edges and
acoeptsthe Umitatiol'lll of the DIlll,lnch.Jding the faet
that the DatI is dynarnlc and is in a constant Slate 0'
marllenance. correction lind update.
MP9I5/2OO6