P&Z Regular Meeting Packet

TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
P. O. Box 383 • Forsyth, Missouri 65653
Phone: 417546-7225/7226 • Fax: 417546-6861
website: WJVW. taneycounty. O1'g

AGENDA
TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
TUESDAY, JANUARY 18, 2011, 6:00 P.M.
COUNTY COMMISSION HEARING ROOM
TANEY COUNTY COURHOUSE

Call to Order:
Establishment of Quorum
Explanation of Meeting Procedures

Review and Action:
Minutes/ December 2010

Final Vote:
Sunflower Estates Mobile Home Park
Bee Creek Storage

Concepts:
White House
Sleepy Bees/ LLC
Hills and Hollows Gardens

Permit Renewal Requests:

Old and New Business:

Adjou rn ment.
 APPLICATION FOR CONCEPT
DIVISION III
TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION

The Concept Application is for the use of the Planning Staff and Commission to
enable us to know the nature of the planned project. The official Division III
Application for permit will be filed along with everything needed to complete
your file, as listed on the Division III Procedure Checklist. Division III
Applications: $150.00, Special Use Applications: $150.00.

NAME OF PROJECT: SLGep¥ IS eeS ) LL C-
~

NAME OF APPUCANT: ~',J .:J{) VI e-5
( be owner ofrecord)

SIGNATURE: ~.
'Sf: be owner ofrecord)
DATE: 12/2?S/ZOIO
r I .
MAIUNG ADDRESS: [58 \/, LL~ J)f2.. iltf -tlolf Mer JI),o 6567 L
TELEPHONE NUMBER: _~...;,....---:.{t...:..~_II--.,l-):.......2_~....:......If-=-.--_3---:,Z_3-.:::3:::-- _
Representative Information
NAME OF REPRESENTATIVE: ~ '(V\. Js f< A- W f) Bf
MAILING ADDRESS (rep.): J ·s ~ Vi L . DIt Lit t± Lf /-4; ~ {15 ~v-? ~v
I
) 105h/7-
TELEPHONE NUMBER (rep.): ~ 8 1']) 2-14 - 32 3 ::,
1

Revised 01/01/2010
 Property Information

ACCESS TO PROPERTY (street # and name):cJ. 000 L4IL£..s lffr(l(; DfL
J2 «MSovJ J MO (1. Lf lV)'. l-e s frOlM E '1 & ~UJ , ( )
Number of Acres (or sq. ft. of lot size): _-----l)_3:-..-:......~J.....l-- _
"cdJ
PARCEL #: _---=D-=g:...---l'<)?,;".,j.b"----=7-;;.Jo:2:....-...;::;Cbo~_- .:-'I£"'-,.;;;..;CO;;;.;:O:...-- _
(This number is on the top left hand corner of your property tax statement)

SECTION:"Lg TOWNSHIP: -=2;;....:3=--- RANGE: ---::L...-==--!--I_

NAME OF SUBDIVISION (if applicable): ~r'i "y ,J Lit k e 'StJa
uk<"~ (,~ () .
Lot # (if applicable) .11-38 ,- /I BLOCK # ----=-IJ-----::;;~~{p _

C'§sidentiaf) c§?icultiJ"rab
Municipality

SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM:
Treatment Plant Individual
Central Sewer: District # - - - -

WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM:
Community Well ~
Central: District # - - - -

DOES THE PROPERTY LIE IN THE IOO-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN? Yes~
THIS REQUEST FALLS INTO ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING
CATEGORIES:

Residential Multi-Family Commercial Industrial
c§ei~ Other - Explain: _

Revised 12/19/03
Anyproposedproject that does not have a posted 911 address must be identified
with a survey flag at the proposed access to the property. Failure to post the
survey flag will result in a delay ofthe Public Hearing. Please give a description of
yourproposedproject including all uses: (IMPORTANT: Make this description as
complete as possible as your public notice will be based on the information
provided here.)

'. -tSA ;p~ I~ if It''',c- e; V; rvj +to ( L-bt ~ It! 's
S IQ-e-p ext d d ev, cer (b nol x2CO&O-~--r ()AP'/C '. I

. r 1 r f 10~f n~ ) (J
';Jo 0peVl ..51f) r e TfQ n T +0 r .s 4L £;5 - ~"'ift'I""1 /hv 'f
.. 1kf s ) V00f&.I) Fed- 6X -r-rucfc BlJl r
• I - ~ etYI p loy ee-s -1-"-! e&'f's (!Jlr we elL
I h0cvr-S of 0f-era-ii 'ON &1Y' - 7-p~

Revised 12/19/03
 APPLICATION FOR CONCEPT
DIVISION III
TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION

The Concept Application is for the use of the Planning Staff and Commission to
enable us to know the nature of the planned project. The official Division III
Application for permit will be filed along with everything needed to complete
your file, as listed on the Division III Procedure Checklist. Division III
Applications: $150.00, Special Use Applications: $150.00.

NAME OF PROJECT: --,1M~fJ. Jfe"""""-LtIt>~ll~s " " -~
.... _

NAME OF APPLICANT: tranSat1 A:tJe/t>8('1en.f LI..C
c ---01- (Must be:.. owner ofrefOrd)

SIGNAT~~ _ . DATE: I~-:M·tp
(MUStbeOWneri!!Ycord)
MAILING ADDRESS: /(j() Bh:tJ1S"1l Cte,~k BIll/) l!e/ts';'r:t;t1~, ~5"72-~7?.b

TELEPHONE NUMBER: _4~/,--7=--"'..o<::Z...=:.2-:.7_""'L..7.L-fl(.J::..L.-t _

Representative Information

NAME OF REPRESENTATIVE: ~$A~IJ.I{.LI.A.-'e...lo/ll.4q)'4..L.!{'h~'C _

~AILING ADDRESS (rep.): J-/t:> s~tdh 3td Strrttt Iltan~,I1p, (PtG6/~

TELEPHONE NUMBER (rep.): 4/7- ~11/-f12-b

Revised 01/01/2010

I .d ISIS-vEE-l..lv
 Property Information

ACCESS TO PROPERTY (street # and name): ~k Zlte'ef-

Number of Acres (or sq. ft. of lot size): ~/fJ--=,9--,f,- _

PARCEL #: 17-'1, () -~f)-fJ&()-(;«c(/35,{)()()
(This number is on the top left hand corner of your property tax statement)

SECTION: -""r2=() TOWNSHIP: _:J._2.. RANGE: _2.:-:+/_ _

NAME OF SUBDIVISION (if applicable): _

Lot # (if applicable) BLOCK # _

WITHIN 600' FROM THIS PROPERTY IS:
(Check all land uses that apply)
c

~Commercial 0 Multi-Family ~esidential ~cultural
J Multi-Use C Municipality

SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM"
[] Treatment Plant ~vidual
[J Central Sewer: District # _

WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM:
o Community Well ~ate Well
o Central: District # _

DOES THE PROPERTY LIE IN THE lOa-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN? 0 Yes ~

THIS REQUEST FALLS INTO ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING
CATEGORIES:

o Residential o Multi-Family ~mercial C Industrial
o Special Use o Other - Explain: _

Revised 12/19/03

lSlS-vEE-l.lv d9~ : EO 01 1 ~ oaa
Any proposedproject that does not have a posted 911 address must be identified
with a sUlVey flag at the proposed access to the property. Failure to post the
sUlVey flag will result in a delay ofthe Public Hearing. Please give a description of
your proposedproject including al/ uses: (IMPORTANT: Make this description as
complete as possible as yourpublic notice will be based on the information
provided here.)

~pI fa: IlJ~()edy
I
/1110 tWD fa/y/e~ S~ ek,st/r
huJ !Ji}t C'tll be$() 1d I

Revised 12/19/03

lSlS-vEE-1.1v dS2:EO 01 12 oaa
 {ZsLQv·J;}.
/~-3J-~IO

TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION f\.A-P
P. O. Box 383 • Forsyth, Missouri 65653
Phone: 417546-7225/7226 • Fax: 417 546-6861
website: wlVw.taneycounty.org

APPLICATION FOR CONCEPT
DIVISION III
TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION

The Concept Application is for the use of the Planning Staff and Commission to
enable us to know the nature of the planned project. The official Division III
Application for permit will be filed along with everything needed to complete
your file, as listed on the Division III Procedure Checklist. Division III
Applications: $150.00, Special Use Applications: $150.00.

NAMEOFPROJECT:--lltL\) ,,~l~ows .~r&os
NAMEOFAPPLI~NT:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~U~
Mvr~ /
"""----f-"'~+-+-O

TELEPHONE NUMBER: (417) 2.51- tJ'-!%
~ll
Reprnsent~tivQe Inf~~at~on .. L- Co (Lf2->-.
NAME OF REPRESENTATIVE: 1\QChe. =nKcho.xvJxCA.A1 ~ . -r0
MAILING ADDRESS (rep.): \ bk-.D \J\J \Qd (,o;± ±b.11w-
. ~ctv\~\)\\\E') tv\-o bS,S9
TELEPHONE NUMBER (rep.): C:ll) ..2L}s-ooqq - ce \I -tt:

Revised 12/19/03
 Property" Information

ACCESS TO PROPERTY (street # and name): U..:.....:~::::........L-t-ItuL:::...::......¥~/..:::::..(d)-=--_

Number of Acres (or sq. ft. of lot size): _

PARCEL #: 0 tf -1.0 - ~ 5..Jcmo~CD"tp""'CfD:f~ (jlJ1)
(Parccl it MUST be on permit. Example: OO-O.O-(K)-()()(H)()()-OOO.OOO. This number is on top left hand comer."of
property tax statement. If you have not paid taxes on property, must have name of previous owner of property.)

SECTION: ~S TOWNSHIP: g-y RANGE: a--o
NAME OF SUBDIVISION (if applicable): _

Lot # (if applicable) BLOCK # _

WITHIN 600' FROM THIS PROPERTY IS:
(Check all land uses that apply)

"1(Commercial 0 Multi-Family ~esidential 0 Agricultural
o Multi-Use 0 Municipality

SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM:
o Treatment Plant 0 Individual
o Central Sewer: District # _

WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM:
o Community Well 0 Private Well
o Central: District # _

DOES THE PROPERTY LIE IN THE 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN? 0 Yes ~NO

THIS REQUEST FALLS INTO ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING
CATEGORIES:

o Residential o Multi-Family 9lcommercial 0 Industrial
o Special Use o Other - Explain: _

Revised 12/19/03
Anyproposedproject that does not have a posted 911 address must be identified
with a surVey flag at the proposed access to the property. Failure to post the
survey flag will result in a delay ofthe Public Hearing. Please give a description of
yourproposedproject including all uses: (IMPORTANT: Make this description as
complete as possible as your public notice will be based on the information
provided here.)

Revised 12/19/03
 TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
P. O. Box 383 • Forsyth, Missouri 65653
Phone: 417546-7225/7226 • Fax: 417546-6861
lVebsite: lVlVlv. tane)'count)'. org

AGENDA
TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
PUBLIC HEARING
MONDAY, DECEMBER 13, 2010, 6:00 P.M.
COUNTY COMMISSION HEARING ROOM
TANEY COUNTY COURTHOUSE

Call to Order:
Chairman Sarah Klinefelter called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. A quorum
was established with seven members present. They were: Sarah Klinefelter, Shawn
Pingleton, Randall Cummings, Ray Edwards, Mark Blackwell, Rick Caudill, and Susan
Martin Staff present: Eddie Coxie, Bonita Kissee, Dan Nosalek.

Mr. Coxie read a statement outlining the procedures for the public hearing and
presented the exhibits.

Public Hearings:
Kanakuk Cemetery: a request by K-Land One, LLC represented by Jerry Jeschke
for a small parcel to be used as a private family cemetery located at Lakeshore Drive at
Kanakuk Kamps. The property is a total of 14,785 sq. ft. Mr. Coxie read the staff report
and presented pictures of the site. He reported what is existing on the property at this
time, and that the property is completely surrounded by Kanakuk property. This site
was previously approved as a subdivision for this use. The County Commission will also
vote on this after approval from the Planning Commission because the land for a
cemetery is deeded to the County in purpetuity. There was no public signed up to
speak. This project will proceed to final vote next week.

Code Amendments: Duplex; definitions, lot size/frontage, PUD, Division of
Land/Minor Subdivisions, and Permit Extensions. Attached to these minutes are draft
copies of these proposed amendments.

Permit Extensions were discussed first. Mr. Coxie explained what the procedure
is now. Discussion followed with Mr. Paulson and Mr. Coxie clarifying the language of
the amendment. No one signed up to speak from the public. This will be voted on next
week.

Subdivision of Land: Mr. Coxie addressed the current Code requirements. Mr.
Paulson stated that this came about because some requests were made to split off from
a parent parcel to family members. Mr. Pingleton suggested changing language to two
acres or more any time sewage treatment is required. Mr. Pingleton also discussed
splitting off a second piece from the parent parcel. Further discussion followed. Mark
Ruda stated that in his opinion this was a good idea to protect from developers creating
parcels that are too dense. This amendment will be voted on next week.

Duplexes: Mr. Coxie explained how he researched this amendment, how the
Code reads and that it does not address duplexes. He also discussed; lot size, should
lots be split for each owner, wastewater treatment and holding land in common,
frontage, houses that have a finished basement (two dwelling units) and what if the
duplex burns down. Mr. Paulson stated that the reason for this amendment is that at
this point in time developers can't get loans for condominium style of ownership. Mr.
Coxie pointed out that property owners who have condominiums have asked to be able
to sell their properties as duplexes. Mr. Cummings discussed not dropping the standards
of the Code if the property burned. This amendment will be voted on next week. Mr.
Ruda stated that a #1 fire rating doesn't take much to accomplish.

Planned Urban Development: Mr. Coxie and Mr. Paulson discussed how this
would affect duplexes. Discussion followed. This may be voted on next week.

Permit Renewal Request:
There were none.

Old and New Business:
Randy Cerretti: Mr. Coxie reported that Mr. Cerretti wants to proceed to public
hearing which is a couple of days before the Board of Adjustment hearing. The Planning
Commission stated that if they voted on the request before he appeared before the BoA
they would have to vote no.

Moriuchi Parcel: The owner of this property wanted to pursue the possibility of a
NASCAR track facility on his property but after finding out this use had already been
approved for another parcel, struck a deal with that property owner. He would
rearrange the location of the uses and propose some added uses. Mr. Coxie advised
that this property was under litigation and that he should check on this, also there is an
endangered species in the small stream on the property. Mr. Coxie read the approved
decision of record from the previous approval. The property must be purchased before
applying for a permit. Staff will research the minutes for the previous approval.

Mr. Coxie reported on a large PSR from the airpark.

Adjournment:
With no other business on the agenda for December 13, 2010 the meeting
adjourned at 7:45 p.m.
 TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
P. O. Box 383 • Forsyth, Missouri 65653
Phone: 417546-7225/7226 • Fax: 417546-6861
website: lVlPllJ. taneycounty. mg

MINUTES
TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
MONDAY, DECEMBER 20, 2010, 6:00 P.M.
COUNTY COMMISSION HEARING ROOM
TANEY COUNTY COURTHOUSE

Call to Order:
Chairman Sarah Klinefelter called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. A quorum
was established with six members present. They were Sarah Klinefelter, Shawn
Pingleton, Randall Cummings, Ray Edwards, Susan Martin, Mark Blackwell. Staff
present: Eddie Coxie, Bonita Kissee, Dan Nosalek.

Mr. Coxie read a statement outlining the procedures for the meeting and
presented the exhibits.

Review and Action:
Minutes, November 2010: with no additions or corrections a motion was made
by Randall Cummings to approve the minutes as written. Seconded by Shawn
Pingleton. The vote to approve the minutes was unanimous.

Final Votes:
Kanakuk Cemetery: request by K-Land One, LLC represented by Jerry Jeschke
for a small subdivision to be used as a private family cemetery located at Lakeshore
Drive at Kanakuk Kamps. Mr. Coxie clarified some items of the request and reviewed
the video from last week. Mr. Paulson pointed out that this would be limited to a family
cemetery only. Mrs. Klinefelter discussed the procedure of the County's responsibility to
cemeteries. Mr. Coxie stated that the land is deeded to the County and Mr. Paulson
explained the process. The decision of record will state the County's responsibility.
With no other discussion a motion was made by Shawn Pingleton with the addition that
this request will come before the County Commission. Seconded by Ray Edwards. The
vote to approve was five in favor and one abstension. (Susan Martin abstained)

Code Amendments:
Permit Extension: Discussion followed regarding "significant change" and
defining it in the Code. After discussion a motion to approve as written by Ray Edwards.
Seconded by Mark Blackwell. The vote to approve was unanimous.
 Duplexes: Mr. Blackwell asked about the fire department's rules on duplexes. Mr.
Coxie reported that the fire district chief told him that they would not inspect a duplex.
Discussion followed. Mrs. Klinefelter discussed dual ownership. Eddie Wolfe reported to
the Commission that when he works with duplexes the agreements are recorded with
the plat, and in his opinion this rule is really needed in Taney County. Discussion
ensued regarding dividing walls between duplex units. Mr. Paulson in his opinion feels
this would be a building code. Mr. Edwards thinks it is necessary to protect the property
owner's safety, and a one hour fire wall is needed. Further discussion ensued. Mr.
Pennel asked Mr. Paulson if the Planning Commission needed to spell everything out to
send to the County Commission. Mr. Coxie stated that the Planning Commission should
be specific. Mr. Paulson stated that the Planning Commission should make a
recommendation to the County Commission with specific language. Mr. Pingleton stated
that this amendment is to protect the property owner and not to "sneak in building
codes". After discussion a motion was made by Ray Edwards to approve the
amendment with the addition of a definition of "wall", minimum standards for a
residential structure for lot size (each unit). Seconded by Susan Martin. The vote to
send the motion to the County Commission was five in favor and one opposed. (Mark
Blackwell opposed)

Division of Land: Mr. Coxie clarified the amendment. Discussion followed with
comments by Mr. Paulson and Mr. Wolfe. After discussion a motion was made by
Shawn Pingleton to approve to send to the Planning Commission with a revision
concerning minimum/maximum lots, additional subdivision of parent parcel. Seconded
by Mark Blackwell. The vote to approve was unanimous.

Concepts:
Sunflower Estates: A request by Stan Hagaman to develop a 100 pad mobile
home park on 34 acres located off Hagaman Parkway. Mr. Coxie clarified the request
and presented the map. The original request which received approval was for 54 acres,
this is the same plan except that it is now on 34 acres. Mrs. Klinefelter asked if the
Planning Commission needed to hear this request. Mr. Paulson clarified that the reason
was the density and that the administrator can't approve this in house according to the
Code. This project will proceed to public hearing in January 2011.

Bee Creek Storage: a request by Tri-Sons Properties to expand an existing
storage facility located off Bee Creek Road. Mr. Coxie clarified the request and
explained the location on the map. Eddie Wolfe was present to represent the applicant,
and explained that this project is platted as all one lot with one entrance which will be
gated. The entire project will be fenced. A detention area is planned for stormwater.
Mr. Pingleton was concerned with room to stop at the gate and that the vehicle would
be off the road. Mrs. Klinefelter clarified there is enough room between the structures
for two cars. This project will proceed to public hearing January 2011.
Permit Renewal Request:
There were none.

Old and New Business:
Mr. Coxie presented a comparison of the Hwy. 65 Project and the extreme sports
complex. The Planning Commission directed Eddie that the property owner may
construct only what has been permitted. Discussion followed with Mr. Coxie updating
the Planning Commission on the other race track project.

At this point the Planning Commission presented Mr. Pennel with a certificate of
appreciation thanking him for his service to Taney County and the Planning
Commission.

Adjournment:
With no other business on the agenda for December 20, 2010 the meeting
adjourned at 7:35 p.m.