Main content start

P&Z Regular Meeting Packet

Search this PDF in the browser, review county metadata, and fall back to the original file at any time.

Planning & Zoningdepartment
P&Z Regular Meetingstopic
known pages

P&Z Regular Meeting Packet

HTML View PDF View Open Original PDF
?
HTML-first viewing

This HTML record preserves the readable text of the county PDF for browser-first access. The original county PDF remains available as the downloadable file of record.

Use this text-first HTML view to read and search the document in the browser. Use the original PDF when you need the official page layout, bid tab formatting, or the county file itself.

TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
P. O. Box 383 • Forsyth, Missouri 65653
Phone: 417546-7225/7226 • Fax: 417546-6861
e-mail: rchrish@co.taney.mo.us

AGENDA
TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
MONDAY, JUNE 21, 2010, 6:00 P.M.
COUNTY COMMISSION HEARING ROOM
TANEY COUNTY COURTHOUSE

Call to Order:
Establishment of Quorum
Explanation of Meeting Procedures

Review and Action:
Minutes/ May 2010

Final Votes:
Branson Lan~ LLC
Cabins at Branson Creek
Raintree Disposal Maintenance Shop

Concepts:
Watkins Subdivision
Spring Creek Park Lot 13 Subdivision
Shooting Berm
National Institute of Marriage

Permit Renewal Requests:

Old and New Business:

Adjournment.
TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
P. o. Box 383 • Forsyth, Missouri 65653
Phone: 417 546-7225 /7226 • Fax: 417 546-6861
e-mail: rchrish@co.taney.mo.us

MINUTES
TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
PUBLIC HEARING
MONDAY, MAY 10, 2010, 6:00 P.M.
COUNTY COMMISSION HEARING ROOM
TANEY COUNTY COURTHOUSE

Call to Order:
Chairman Sarah Klinefelter called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. A quorum
was established with nine members present. They were: Sarah Klinefelter, Shawn
Pingleton, Frank Preston, Randall Cummings, Jim Brawner, Ray Edwards, Carl Pride,
Mark Blackwell, and new member Susan Martin.

Mr. Coxie read a statement outlining the procedures for the public hearing and
presented the exhibits.

Public Hearing:
Bill Majors: a request to construct four commercial buildings located at 13159 St.
Hwy. 160. Mr. Coxie read the staff report and presented pictures and a video of the
site. Mr. Coxie gave a history of the project and explained that this project started
before permits were issued. The Taney County Commission granted an emergency
waiver to allow the property owner to proceed because he had buildings scheduled to
be delivered. A land grading permit was issued by staff. Mrs. Klinefelter clarified why
the applicant received the emergency waiver also that he didn't realize he needed a
permit. John Price attorney, representing Larry McKaig who lives across the street from
this project, gave a timeline of when the construction started, and when all the
paperwork was done. Mr. Price made a point in his opinion that this emergency waiver
' ..j
was unlawful. He stated that no where in the State Statute does it say that the County
Commission has the power to change the rules. The Statute governing the Board of
Adjustment was also referred to by Mr. Price, but that Board also cannot waiver from
the Zoning Laws, nor does the Development Guidance Code. He asked the Commission
to deny the request. He pointed out that all the people present couldn't come and voice
their concerns in the beginning because this was not applied for properly. Mr. Price
made three points, that this was more than one acre disturbed, stormwater runoff
plans, and silt fence should be in place. Then pointed out the specific items that were
Violated. Mr. Coxie pointed out that Mr. Price's client was running a business out of his
home. Larry McKaig explained that he does run an internet business from his home. He
stated that the runoff from this project was ruining his property and garden in the back,
in his opinion. Mr. Blackwell asked if there was runoff onto his property before the
development. Mr. McKaig stated that there was but not as bad. Scott Gillman who lives
also across from the project was concerned about water quality and the local wells and
septics, and the fact that a permit was not issued. Ordell Michaud another neighbor was
concerned about pollutants entering his well. Carol Kooistra who takes care of the well
in Dogwood Hollow is also concerned about the water quality. She was upset that the
permits were not obtained before hand, and that all the people were not notified. Scott
Puckett who lives in the neighborhood stated that there is an entrance off St. Hwy. H,
he also has runoff, and was upset that there was not a permit issued before
construction. He was concerned that the entire property would be covered with
buildings. Mr. Blackwell asked if there was runoff from the entrance onto Mr. Puckett's
property. Mr. Puckett stated that there is. Mr. Coxie will provide a topo map of the
property next week. Jennifer Puckett reiterated what Mr. Puckett said, and stated that
you can't build under the power lines and was concerned that there would be liquid
from the cars leaking onto the ground. She was also concerned with solid waste
materials. John Derby who lives in Walnut Shade voiced his concerns with the speed
limit and there is no passing on that road. He reminded the Commission that on other
projects a turn lane is required, and that soil erosion plans are usually reqUired, and
wondered if the property owner is asking for commercial zoning for the whole site. He
also wanted to know about location of a retaining wall. Mr. Coxie reported that splitting
off some of the property was discussed with the applicant, but could be done at a later
time. This request is only for four buildings at this time. Sharon Robinson whose sister
lives across and down from this property, wanted to make sure this request was done
properly, traffic safety was a concern, water quality, noise and residential compatibility.
Josh Whisenhunt who is construction manager on the project stated that work begins at
6:45 or 7:00 a.m. and the power lines are not on this property. Bill Majors, property
owner stated that it should be daylight before work starts. He also addressed the
concerns of the property owners, by stating that the liquids from the cars will be
collected and disposed of, the additional five acres will not be purchased until after the
first of the year and nothing will be put on it, he stated that there shouldn't be runoff
onto the neighbors property because it does not fall right topographically. He also
stated that he has done everything that has been asked of him, because as soon as he
was notified of the permitting process he has obeyed the rules. Mrs. Klinefelter asked
him why he went to the County Commission. Mr. Majors clarified that it was because he
had materials on the way. Mr. Blackwell clarified that Mr. Majors plans to build his
residence at the back of the property off St. Hwy. H. Mr. Majors plans to gravel part of
the property to place approximately five to fifteen cars on the property, and cars for
sale, approXimately twenty. There are fourteen parking spaces for each building. Mr.
McKaig reported that there has been work before 6:00 a.m., and he had discussions
with MoDot and DNR. Jennifer Cruston who lives across the field stated that her
children had been woke up in the morning because of the noise from the construction.
Mr. Paulson stated that the county does have a construction ordinance that could apply
in these circumstances. Jennifer Puckett stated that she has watched the water flow off
this property. Joel Baca who works for Mr. Majors stated that in his opinion Mr. Majors
has provided much needed jobs for the area. Mrs. Klinefelter closed the public hearing
and stated the Commission will make its decision next week.

Mr. Coxie reported on how the emergency use waiver came about, and that the
Planning Commission must make sure a project does not violate absolute policies. Mr.
Paulson clarified the County Commission is the Board which grants the waivers.
Discussion followed.

Permit Renewal Requests:
Altom Construction Office: approval granted March 16, 2009 for an office
building and yard for storage located at St. Hwy. 160 and Blair Road. The applicant was
not present. Discussion followed regarding compliance with the requirements.

Addition to Forest Lake at Stonebridge Village: approval granted June 16, 2008
for a multi use project located off Limestone Dr. Not present

Smoke Tree Hills: approved December 17, 2007 for a single family residential
subdivision located off Picket Ridge Road. Not present.

Mt. Branson Townhomes: approved May 21, 2007 for a townhome/row home
project located off Candlestick Road. Not present.

Tri-Sons Storage/Walkington Lane: tabled until the applicant resolves until an
easement issue can be resolved. Decision of Record is held until easement is finalized.
The applicant has now finalized the easement issue, and would like to proceed with
permit issuance. Not present.

Old and New Business:
Bylaws: changes to the bylaws have been made which were discussed at the last
meeting. One more change will be made regarding amount of pay. This will be
discussed and voted on at the next meeting.

Duplexes: proposed regulations for patio home subdivisions presented at the last
meeting. Mr. Coxie recommended that the Commission wait until the Code Book is
changed sufficiently, they cannot address the safety concerns. The Commission asked
that the minutes reflect that they chose not to pursue Mr. Styron's recommendations.
He reported that there will be meetings with the County Commission regarding the
Code changes and invited anyone on either Board who wished to attend. He presented
a draft of zoning districts for their perusal.

Branson Airport Cell Tower: an application for placing a cell tower with
collocations at the airport, applicant wishes to be permitted in-house. Bruce Colony
representing the airport, presented a site plan of the request and explained the
location, and lighting. The Commission feels that it is procedure to hear new cell towers
and this should proceed through the process.

Watkins Subdivision: Mr. Coxie explained that this was approved for a minor
subdivision some years ago. The Commission wishes to hear this in the Division III
Process.

Mr. Coxie reported that Oakmont Hills is now foreclosed upon.

Mark Blackwell apologized for comments he might have made in error this
evening.

Mr. Preston stated that in his job as Taney County Road and Bridge
Administrator, he tries to make his decisions based upon putting himself in the place of
the people.

Mr. Pennel reported that the Commission stated that Mr. Majors was asked to
visit with his neighbors when he was granted the emergency use waiver. The
Commission asked for the County Commission minutes when this waiver was issued.

Adjournment:
With no other business on the agenda for Monday, May 10, 2010 the meeting
adjourned at 8:10 p.m.
TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
P. O. Box 383 • Forsyth, Missouri 65653
Phone: 417546-7225/7226 • Fax: 417546-6861
website: nllVW. taneycounty. org

MINUTES
TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
MONDAY, MAY 17, 2010, 6:00 P.M.
COUNTY COMMISSION HEARING ROOM
TANEY COUNTY COURTHOUSE

Call to Order:
Chairman Sarah Klinefelter called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. A quorum
was establi~hed with nine members present. They were: Sarah Klinefelter, Randall
Cummings, Ray Edwards, Carl Pride, Frank Preston, Mark Blackwell, Jim Brawner,
Shawn Pingleton, and Susan Martin. Staff present: Eddie Coxie, Bonita Kissee, Dan
Nosalek, and Bob Paulson.

Mr. Coxie read a statement outlining the procedures for the meeting and
presented the exhibits.

Review and Action:
Minutes: April 2010, with no changes or additions a motion was made by Ray
Edwards to approve the minutes as written. Seconded by Randall Cummings. The
motion to approve the minutes was unanimous.

Final Vote:
Bill Majors: a request for four commercial bUildings located at 13159 St. Hwy.
160. Mrs. Klinefelter clarified the project by stating that the Commission realizes the
project had several issues to consider and felt it is important to separate the issues
because some of them did not factor into their decision. Shawn Pingleton asked the
applicant for a plat showing what the entire project would look like. Mr. Majors stated
that Archer Surveying will do the final plat after approval is granted. Staff presented a
slide show, video, and County Commission minutes when the emergency waiver was
acted on. Mr. Coxie discussed the new land use map for Taney County and the area
surrounding the request. The map showed all of the commercial uses around the site.
The pictures showed the site distance off the St. Hwy. The topo map showed the
direction the stormwater would flow. A letter from Randy Haes with road and bridge
was presented regarding the silt and that it had not crossed over to the neighboring
properties. Mr. Coxie also reported that the sewer district's water quality specialist met
with Mrs. Koistra about the shared well and explained he did not see a problem with
runoff to the well. Mr. Pingleton clarified that the Code states a project must not make
runoff worse. Mr. Majors stated that the hours of operation planned would be 8 to 6
Monday through Friday and possibly half or full day Saturday. These figures are
approximate. The third building is the motorcycle shop and the fourth building is
anticipated to be part of the motorcycle shop. The number of cars might be a maximum
of 20 for sale and a maximum of 15 to be worked on at a time. Exterior lighting will be
non-intrusive, and minimal, just enough for security. The area between the entrance
and the highway will be green space before the parking lot starts. Mr. Brawner pointed
out on the map the current use shown. After discussion Shawn Pingleton commented
that this is not normally the way a project begins in not obtaining a permit before
construction and that the Commission's job is to make sure this request follows the
requirements of the Code. The developer takes a risk when obtaining a permit after the
fact. Mr. Pingleton then made a motion to approve based upon the decision of record
with the addition of; buffering in the form of a 6' privacy fence along the east border of
the commercial lot along the highway, hours of operation shall be 8 to 6 pm Monday
through Saturday, a letter from Modot regarding the entrance, lot split between the lot
in front and the back not to include more than 3.4 acres as presented, amount of cars
shall be 15 on the car lot which are road ready, light trespass, and any future
commercial development receives approval from the Planning Commission. Mark
Blackwell seconded. The vote to approve was seven in favor with two abstensions.

Concepts:
Cabins at Branson Creek: a request by Branson Dev. LLC to construct 276 cabins
with riding stables and additional amenities located at Branson Creek Blvd. Eddie Wolfe
representing the developer presented a site plan, explained the request and stated it is
located off the south side of the bridge. The roads planned will not be to County
Standards but the developer will not ask the County to take them over. Mr. Wolfe
explained that if the developer decides to do the roads this way, he will meet with staff.
There are some existing ponds that can be used for detention. The developer would like
the option to do nightly rental if needed. A sewer trunk line will be run from the City of
Hollister. This part of the project contains around 80 acres, but there will be more
development in the future. This project will proceed to public hearing next month.

Environmental Learning Campus: a request by Global Resources for
Environmental Education and Nature to operate an educational facility consisting of
classrooms, cabins, barn, offices and gift store located at 903 Reno Springs Road. Mr.
Wolfe also represented this project, and presented site plans. Access will be off Reno
Springs Road. The applicant will discuss at the public hearing how much land he plans
to purchase. A lodge is existing, which will be utilized and parking will be placed around
it for the use of the educational facility. Five pods which will hold four tigers each will
be constructed for twenty tigers. Mrs. Klinefelter asked if this property would meet the
need since it is so far out. Mr. Wolfe stated that the applicant felt it would because it is
so isolated and would meet the requirements that the Planning Commission had when
they appeared before. Mr. Pingleton discussed if the fence were compromised how
what the back-up plan was. Mr. Wolfe stated that the applicant could address that
question when he is here for the public hearing next month.

Branson Airport Cell Tower Project: a request by Branson Land LLC to construct
a cell tower to allow collocations located at 491 Branson Creek Blvd. No one was
present. Discussion followed regarding allowing the previous meeting to serve as the
concept. A motion was made to accept the previous meeting as the concept hearing.
Jim Brawner seconded. Discussion followed regarding collocations. We do not govern
collocations. The vote to approve the motion was unanimous. This project will appear
for public hearing next month.

Raintree Disposal Maintenance Shop: a request by Richard Fordyce to move his
solid waste disposal business to a different location. Mr. Fordyce explained the location
and request. The Commission explained that the vegetative buffer would need to be left
next to the residential property. This request will proceed to public hearing next month.

Permit Renewal Request:
The Lakes: Evan Shark representing the project was present to ask for the third
and last renewal request. Mr. Shark explained that he was dealing with the same
problems with the approval of the East/West Corridor and stated that in his opinion in
the next year nothing would be done with the highway and he would still not be able to
proceed. He reported that there is still a need and an interest for affordable housing in
this area. Jim Brawner made a motion to extend the permit. Mark Blackwell seconded.
The vote to approve was unanimous.

Forest Lake at Stonebridge: Mr. Coxie clarified the approval. Eddie Wolfe
representing the applicant stated there was no change. With no discussion a motion
was made by Shawn Pingleton to approve. Seconded by Mark Blackwell. The vote to
approve was unanimous.

Smoke Tree Hills: Eddie Wolfe representing the developer explained the approval
and stated that the developer has not changed anything. A motion was made to extend
by Ray Edwards. Seconded by Shawn Pingleton. The vote to extend was unanimous.

Tri-Sons Storage/Walkington Lane Site: Eddie Wolfe representing the project
clarified the approval. Mr. Coxie explained that the project was waiting for recording
until road easement could be worked out. The developer called the office and reported
the easement had been granted and is ready to proceed with renewal. After discussion
a motion was made by Shawn Pingleton to renew the permit. Seconded by Carl Pride.
The vote to approve was unanimous.

Altom Construction: This project as been on the agenda before to renew, no one
was present again to represent the request. The applicant will be served with a stop
work order and informed to come back before the Planning Commission for approval.
Perano Estates: Mr. Wolfe reported that this project is due for renewal and
requested the Planning Commission act on this at this meeting. Discussion followed
regarding no changes have occurred. Mr. Coxie reported that this is a current valid
project and nothing has been done with it. A motion was made by Randall Cummings to
extend the project. Frank Preston seconded. The vote to approve was unanimous.

Old and New Business:
Bylaws: changes regarding Article V / Compensation; Ray Edwards made a
motion to approve. Seconded by Randall Cummings. The vote to approve was
unanimous.

Mr. Coxie updated the Commission on the work session with the County
Commission regarding defining zoning districts.

Adjournment:
With no other business on the agenda for Monday, May 17, 2010 the meeting
adjourned at 7:55 p.m.
/

TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
P. O. Box 383 • Forsyth, Missouri 65653
Phone: 417 546-7225 /7226 • Fax: 417 546-6861
website: W1VlV. taneycounty. org

APPLICATION FOR CONCEPT
DIyISION III
TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION

The Concept Application is for the use of the Planning Staff and Commission to
enable us to know the nature of the planned project. The official Division III
Application for permit will be filed along with everything needed to complete
your file, as listed on the Division III Procedure Checklist. Division III
Applications: $150.00, Special Use Applications: $150.00.

NAME OF PROJECT: f!M;rJDfZ 0 P/#1' () f 1m 1 f tj t-.Jtt'TJ{/',;;' 5 liB aVi,],'ori

NAME OF APPLICANT: ~r:fJ1 f ltlJIJll1l i.UA1~;#7
(Must be owner ofrecord)

SIGNATURE: ---/~ZqL.4tYtL.J..' -t~vflO~·,~·
_.- DATE: ,'..- 1~''iO
(Must be owner ofrecord)

MAILING ADDRESS:
(Jftt·

TELEPHONE NUMBER: ----:H~/....!-7-,'L=-.;q~4---,"/~1:. ! : . 6.=. . [) _---'/l..I.<~~tp(..:.=..tt~I/".L:../..Ll-__.:::§~~.!_1'~'3:. . :.~. .: . . ~ _ _

Representative Information

NAME OF REPRESENTATIVE: ---,f::...!,J./M'.LL.--=-.:W:..!-;1~f)~K,,",-/J:=:....j _

MAILING ADDRESS (rep.):

TELEPHONE NUMBER (rep.): --::4_'_'7-_J._tf_tl_-"'_J]_"'D _

Revised 12/19/03
Property· Information

ACCESS TO PROPERTY (street # and name): ~ 71 ){&1/1 /7&

_lrJlilrJ?11 fllflVI? MIJ,

Number of Acres (or sq. ft. of lot size): ~()I 311 5,{J fie. tntflllP,/~1K ttJ1/1B //'J/ nt:.,

PARCEL #: /1-101 #3;()5~ '1-,0 -(N-OOO-"{)()()-Otl7, tJ(J~ LpYJlI/-: o5'.;,;l,(J~O'1-(/OO~MlJ-a:!JY,(Jotf
(Parcel # MUST be on permit. Example: 00-0.0-00-‫סס‬0-ooo-ooo.000. This number is on top left hand cOrneJ:·of
property tax statement. If you have not paid taxes on property, must have name of previous owner of property.)

SECTION: _----lo~1_ _TOWNSHIP: --:,?..:-tf"-- RANGE: -..I.jZ~/_ _

NAME OF SUBDIVISION (if applicable): --..:.:W::....LB..!...:1"..:...:::j(;..!...!:III1:....:S~ _

Lot # (if applicable) '1 fly\) t/ BLOCK # _

WITHIN 600' FROM THIS PROPERTY IS:
(Check all land uses that apply)

o Commercial 0 Multi-Family 0Residential 0 Agricultural
o Multi-Use o Municipality
SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM:
o Treatment Plant 0'Individual
o Central Sewer: District # _

WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM:
o Community Well .01'rivate Well
o Central: District # _

DOES THE PROPERTY LIE IN THE 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN? 0 Yes 0' No

THIS REQUEST FALLS INTO ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING
CATEGORIES:

rz{ Residential o Multi-Family 0 Commercial 0 Industrial
o Special Use o Other - Explain: _

Revised 12/19/03
Any proposedproject that does not have a posted 911 address must be identified
with a surVey flag at the proposed access to the property. Failure to post the
survey flag will result in a delay ofthe Public Hearing. Please give a description of
your proposedproject including all uses: (IMPORTANT: Make this description as
complete as possible as your public notice will be based on the information
provided here.)
~ .....r:/' I J - . ' I / '
:t / M Wn //(1 )/7 t>JrtJJl 1b InJ4Kr. A tY1IMtJlL CHA-A/ji: 1"0

ltJ,rrK,'N ~ 5u6Q'/f,"tj,otJ e -:f -r:M lJA1K. AI:) WJ1N~ TO --f!lJ(,z 1-0-( 3
fiNO &2"1 W fofJ4L- of :)&,'11 r'-c-, fWO iI1J1fK!l JH/tl'1 :Yr/Io tJ-/ttltif idrj

1.07 "3ff l...IC¥110 1tJ1J4=L 5.00 tlc... 10-11{11 WOillD (1J1i1L /(),(J~tlc! 14NO

Revised 12/19/03
Amended Plat of Lots 3 & 4 Watkins Subdivision

DISCLAIMER
Taney Cot.stty makeaevt1Y effort 10 produce nd publish
the most current and acante nJorrnation pos:sible.
ThIs dati is prOYided"8S}s"wthool:W3rranty
Of artf representllion of ao::uracy. tmelinesa or
~leteness. The burden tor determflklg~.
co"'tHlesa. tmeinu. mercharta~aM fitness
Jot 01 the apprtlplillltness lor use rests soIefy on the
l'equlSler. The Cotl'1ty malees no _rrwtties. express
or~.aslotheusaofIheOati.~a,..no
mpiecI warranties of l'l'lI'fCNntlbiity orr.rne-
for
• pertil:lAar pcxpose. The requester adcno¥tledges and
aooeptsfhe lmibloonsofthe 0iIta. includng Ihe fact
!hIltM Dalalactynarrieand sine co.-.tlrt ate of
malntenanctl. corrac:tion and update.
""915'2006
TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
P. O. Box 383 • Forsyth, Missouri 65653
Phone: 417 546-7225 /7226 • Fax: 417546-6861
website: www.taneycounty.org

APPLICATION FOR CONCEPT
DIyISION III
TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION

The Concept Application is for the use of the Planning Staff and Commission to
enable us to know the nature of the planned project. The official Division III
Application for permit will be filed along with everything needed to complete
your file, as listed on the Division III Procedure Checklist. Division III
Applications: $150.00, Special Use Applications: $150.00.

NAME OF PROJECT: 5~ rr~ CCalc DO-II, Lof (~{fr;l!atJ-1)
NAME OF APPUCANT: J3cddQord ::roAnn ~121+;CJ LL<-
rI2 iJ r:rrst be owner ofrecord)
SIGNATURE: ~I ~ DATE: S--~ Lf-I D
(Must be owner ofrecord)

MAILING ADDRESS: 390. .,\ /J. Q v 0-..: I 6( uv7 R..j 62..0Ji~ 'fno (or7~ I
TELEPHONE NUMBER: L{( 7". ~J. '1- 0 ) 01
Representative Information

NAME OF REPRESENTATIVE: ~ _

MAILING ADDRESS (rep.): _

TELEPHONE NUMBER (rep.): _

Revised 12/19/03

a
Property· Information

ACCESS TO PROPERTY (street # and name): R03 B )a.ct;berr7 DrJU~

Number of Acres (or sq. ft. of lot size): _--=."--.:&=---.:1>:..--..:.....:Au::::..-=.e.::::;:.5 _

PARCEL #: "~-------------------
(Parcd #: MUST be on permit. Example: OO-O.O-GO-OOCJ-OO()-OOO.OOO. This number is on top left hand corner."of
property tax statement. If you have not paid taxes on property, must have name of previous owner of property.)

SECTION: _(:2.. TOWNSHIP: a;t fJ;)'+-~ RANGE: ~ VJ~T

NAME OF SUBDIVISION (if applicable): ~r('·'J (r€e..k ()o.J lc
Lot # (if applicable)~~ BLOCK # _

WITHIN 600' FROM THIS PROPERTY IS:
(Check all land uses that apply)

o Commercial 0 Multi-Family .wResidential 0 Agricultural
o Multi-Use o Municipality

SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM:
o Treatment Plant 0 Individual
«Central Sewer: District # _

WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM:
~ommunity Well 0 Private Well
o Central: District # _

DOES THE PROPERTY LIE IN THE 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN? 0 Yes po
THIS REQUEST FALLS INTO ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING
CATEGORIES:

t)iResidential o Multi-Family 0 Commercial 0 Industrial
o Special Use o Other - Explain: _

Revised 12/19/03
Anyproposedproject that does not have a posted 911 address must be identified
with a suniey flag at the proposed access to the property. Failure to post the
survey flag will result in a delay ofthe Public Hearing. Please give a description of
your proposedproject including all uses: (IMPORTANT: Make this description as
complete as possible as your public notice will be based on the information
provided here.)

Revised 12/19/03
Amended Plat of Lots 3 & 4 Watkins Subdivision

DISCLAIMER
Taney County makes every dolt to prodUCe and pubIistl
the most current and accurate Information possib6e.
Thlsdataisprovi:led".Is·~warrarcy
or any J'ePf\!:sen1atiDn of accuracy, timeliness or
cofl1)leleness.. The burden for c1etennini'lg ltCQIr3Cy.
col'llllelene'SS, timelnets, merchanlabiity and !Inns
lor or the apPrOpriatmes5 for UIo8 rKts solely on the
requester. The CoIIIty mikes no wamu,ties. express
or~.astotheuseoftheOllta. 'Th«e.reno
impfied WoImllntie. of IMfd'IarUblity or anus Jol'
a particI.Aar~. The requester ac:knowtedgn and
accepts lhe irMations of the Data. ~ the IiJd:
thai the Data ls dynImic and is r. a consar't!tate' of
fNlintenance. correction and l4Idale.
MP9'-iI2OO6
APPLICATION FOR CONCEPT
DIVISION III
TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION

The Concept Application is for the use of the Planning Staff and Commission to
enable us to know the nature of the planned project. The official Division III
Application for permit will be filed along with everything needed to complete
your file, as listed on the Division III Procedure Checklist. Division III
Applications: $150.00, Special Use Applications: $150.00.

NAME OF PROJECT: S'\\-e>or tiJGr ~~(('(-A,---. _

NAME OF APPLICANT: L. ~ LF_ S1\ ~ K....;::t:::;...:y"--- _
(Must be owner ofrecord)

SIGNATURE: ~ ~K~ DATE: t>~ -I J. -/0
~;o;kCOrd)
MAILING ADDRESS:.s\ ~3 -S1 c.~ 'r-\c>R..t.. c.th-\~~ '\t A..0*~
13(MsotO I ~ ~S(Qlfp \
TELEPHONE NUMBER: ~-~(Q.5 -1:11:1 (.c~,l) 113- . . ~:S1 '-~~ &;(f/iJh1~

Representative Information
NAME OF REPRESENTATIVE: ~A~t.. =f\~ fr&Jc) t

MAILING ADDRESS (rep.): S;:-f1 M t. 1\ ~ ItJsOV£:
TELEPHONE NUMBER (rep.): S i\ Mt. .,q~ 1 tsbl) k

Revised 01/01/2010
Property Information

ACCESS TO PROPERTY (street # and name): ~q~ ,g~c*~cX\.t

C·&V,~W p.,,~{)BL.!..bl..l.- --:-- _
~LfA!-e-£? or- L,Ji.1'JD pr<.o Jar . J
Number of Acres (or sq. ft. of lot size): .3£ 1cx,ds. )( <s 5 ~o. rct5;
PARCEL #: 01-6,0 --):& -OOO-COD-d) , · a2 \
(This number is on the top left hand corner of your property tax statement)

SECTION: 2;)- TOWNSHIP: ----""d:~3_ _RANGE: d d....
NAME OF SUBDIVISION (if applicable): _

Lot # (if applicable), BLOCK # _

WITHIN 600' FROM THIS PROPERTY IS: P6~
(Check all land uses that appiy)

Commercial Multi-Family Residential Agricultural
Multi-Use Municipality

SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYST~ ~
Treatment Plant CIndivid!laL)
Central Sewer: District # - - - -

WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM· >

Community Well ~welD
Central: District # - - - -

DOES THE PROPERTY LIE IN THE 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN? Yes ®
THIS REQUEST FALLS INTO ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING
CATEGORIES:

Residential
Special Use
Anyproposedproject that does not have a posted 911 address must be identified
with a survey flag at the proposed access to the property. Failure to post the
survey flag will result in a delay ofthe Public Hearing. Please give a description of
your proposedproject including all uses: (IMPORTANT: Make this description as
complete as possible as your public notice will be based on the information
provided here.)

~__.J::oL.:~ __ I~ i (i{\ Gm ALlmJ d-'
~(re~ \N\b~ ~
-3 S <\V'dS, U ~~t~ LA
---1J ,~c+\ "ti'\\}.. Le-tl \-\--00 ~ -n> C- J....'E AN
=:g~ ~ 6+); wi\- <-tE R.._t _
~c>€. ~
\ ~\\.'0frh ~(((~:E~ -S~r-ftUQ­
J.~~Sf()E s-<jk?D'"\rtJct CJ.-.'4~t>
~l\) S1\-.l:tIY 'tt,(J-A...!....-r10_'~_Gr..:.....L.., _.,...---- _

~})\C\< 't-A\A~Y QvJC\) I t\~~6 \-A ~rf-S:' 1 t '

{?fLAIfJ Q~D +u.'\\J R.-t.~&D~i\~t$~JL.--. _

Revised 12/19/03
Shooting Berm

DiSCLAIMER
Tlney County m8kesevery ert'ort to procIuc:e Ind pubtish
the most cumtnt and ac:aIl'ale information possibll.
ThIs data Is provided °as IS" wihout mrranly
or Iny representation of locoracy, timeliness Of
oo~letenns. The burden for determining 'CQlracy'.
COfTllleleness, timeliness, merchlmbility Ind fitness
for or tIM: IpproprllteneM for use rests solely on the
requester. The County maklS no warT'lnties, express
Of Jtr¢ecI, U to theU. oftne Data. There are no
implied warranties of merchanllbllity or lItneM for
aparticWlrpurpose. Therequeslera~8r.:l
ac:oeplslhe imitalior'l$ofthe Data. irdJding the fact
that the Datil Is dynan*; ancIti in I cons&art Ole of
mar.tenance, corrKtion and \.¢at•.
MPOI5I2OO6
f2-Le- v~
b-! ~d-DID

APPLICATION FOR CONCEPT
DIVISION III
TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION

The Concept Application is for the use of the Planning Staff and Commission to
enable us to know the nature of the planned project. The official Division III
Application for permit will be filed along with everything needed to complete
your file, as listed on the Division III Procedure Checklist. Division III
Applications: $150.00, Special Use Applications: $150.00.

NAME OF PROJECT: lAJ5I)O~~~ :£~,sTUL!"\!; or- 'M'Ar:::'5I~
NAME OF APPLICANT: J:16R'"'-h...::..........TY-4-.£.t\rt=4--'------- _
t be owner ofrecord)

SIGNATURE: DATE: ~

MAILING ADDRESS: 2 S 0 -k~OOD ~\VE. ±:kWd5:>1'F-R.. 1"10 I

7 ~'5b72-
TELEPHONE NUMBER: 417 - 635 ... 5882..
Representative Information

NAME OF REPRESENTATIVE: YUt-\.(:, D~S\~ 6RevP

MAILING ADDRESS (rep.): \ \0 ~~ ~'\::>Ay}CO ~. 1o~
f.3>R~~~ Mo (0£6 I ~

TELEPHONE NUMBER (rep.): ~ bJpptA~~ (:;II-{) -?-35 - 02.35

Revised 01/01/2010
Property Information

ACCESS TO PROPERTY (street # and name): (out-\"TY i<.o~ T- 30

2\0 ~l-.\..-A L~

Number of Acres (or sq. ft. of lot size): _:---'I---=O:.-._L _
PARCEL #: OS -5.0 - 2-2.. - 000 -ODo - 0>0. OOL{
(This number is on the top left hand corner of your property tax statement)

SECTION: 22- TOWNSHIP: 2; ~. RANGE:~

NAME OF SUBDIVISION (if applicable): _

Lot # (if applicable) BLOCK # _

WITHIN 600' FROM THIS PROPERTY IS:
(Check all land uses that apply)

o Commercial :J Multi-Family :J Residential :J Agricultural
~ Multi-Use CJ Municipality

SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM:
~ Treatment Plant 'R[ Individual
o Central Sewer: District # _

WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM:
~ Community Well 0 Private Well
o Central: District # _

DOES THE PROPERTY LIE IN THE 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN? Q Yes ~ No

THIS REQUEST FALLS INTO ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING
CATEGORIES:

o Residentia I ;] Multi-Family :J Commercial LJ Industrial
:J Special Use .& Other - Explain: N.\c:ID1.j - r<t:t1Th\-
UU ~~x=l-\~
Revised 12/19/03
Any proposedproject that does not have a posted 911 address must be identified
with a survey flag at the proposed access to the property. Failure to post the
survey flag will result in a delay ofthe Public Hearing. Please give a description of
your proposed project including all uses: (IMPORTANT: Make this description as
complete as possible as your public notice will be based on the information
provided here.)

~ e.TID~p..\- ::t:Bs--rirtzrE. of H i=-1Sf;\N":iP lS ~S1l-\--'0
A D\VV;,\D1-\ -m- ~~ Fog, A HAffi\N2"E
Ccu~W4." 1S-CSOgI: Tt\?- 'F-'i--\<;:fD\4:2 Wse.. W\\..L
. .
-B"i== LS?O TI£. D\-\\'N,6 / CC:OH-SPL\~ ~ \'B 1
~~\SS:fg\~ bOO L,\V\W ~-r?~.

( I

_~L£X?7 HAtNTPHAN0P= NJO !hr/S£ f<1?Ff'/lJb Br./ILOIHh/
ANIJ .25 ~L CABlW-S., At1fY.1iriPf:? e'U rIfE.
2rfF.. CoHSt5r 8E A Bv15L ~/ ~PW.I 'R~
_FIr/ At{{) ldALJL-H-Mo ~Il ..s.« oJR (:;0& \-1",,"\- mF-
f~6PE¥3:( ts. TO ~ b ~\"''''}>'vq~b A\¥C>
~vtn=uL 0P-r AvJb'! ~g CN'fLPb CAr\-
fu..<.p ~ \)j)fbV\\-:\.('L ----n1~~ '11 Affi\~E- •

Revised 12/19/03
81'= s\:k RE~AR I

--J) ~,
r /
ijEf. PT 0"/ /
"-
)j ~9'31'59" W
'---- "" \

-- / I
T9P 8lP~ \

I I 3~3?/3'i
~-"-
61;2.21'
"" \
\ I
I l'l

ffi
/
I
I! ........ - - - - ... " T 'It
OJ
I \ i
j ,r
; ,
/
", \ 1 .,o
I
/'
I j
/' \ \

, =-:
;</
~I
\ \
~ N~
","
N'f..1
/'
/ \
I
\
\
k oo~
... 0
o
I \
~
/ \
z ./
./

-=_.•:
./ \
~ \
LEGEND /'./ \

1- _~
1 COUNSELING CENTE~(-900 S.F.) I
2 ADMINISTRATION BI:JILDING ./
3 CHAPEL (154 S.EArS. 2,640 S.F.) ./
4 FIRE PIT A~E'A -'
5 WALKIN9 tRAILS
6 PROP0SED GAZEBO
7 EXI)"tING GAZEBO ;' -'
8 PyMP HOUSE (THEME TO MAT9H"PROJECT)
9 ,MAINTENANCE AND HOUSE.KEEPING BUILDING
.. - - - -10 COITAGE 400 S.F. WITry80X12' PORCH (25 UNITS)
11 BOAT DOCK ./
/ / ~~L\ '/..\
./ L\/ /?-
i , I:', ,y-- , " - \\.lj'., ~ [DIp,., ..) " \ "-
./ S\~ «;,'/..'!> "-
"-
II 1/1 I \\ I ./
I S'/..'/../
I
w
z
::;
I
I
:~ I
I
I
I
=---r
3'

/
I
210.00' w
/
S 86'02'00" £
"'Q"!
,.. I ll:

...'o"
I :lO
~1
/

I
I "
E!I W
I ", \ \ I-
::J

'ro I
\
\ ""- "- \
\
\
, I-
;:
I/l

, ,,
00,,>
~m
I
I \ \ I
I
I "- "- \ ~
I~~ I I \ "- "- N 86'02'00" w
,,
~ I \ / -'
\ "- 210.00'
z \
"-
"-
\ \
"-
/
'"
Z
I
\ I " ""- "-
"-
"-
"-
\
\
\ "- , /
/ o
~
\ \
307.3f " ',~. \ \ \
, / z

- ,
>
I
\ "- "- S $'31'59" &. ~
w
z
::;
"-
"-
"-
" "- "-
"-
"-
"-
"-
\ "" \
\
\
,
\
\
"-
"- , 0>
0>
\
\
I
I
I
e
Q
'- \ \
b '- "- \ \ \ "-
\ ~. I w
~
"- \ \
'" "-
,, I
\

-'
-' -- )
"-
"-
"-
"-
\
\
\
"-
"-
"-
""- "- '\ z 170.70' \ 0.00' I I W
)'J

;b:Ll)./
/
,...,--- __

- .......
"-
"-
"-
"-
"-
"-
,, , \
\ "-
"-
"-
"- ,
\ g
' 'u:"i<
S '02' 0" £
21

I
I 0::
a..
lJo.v/ "- "- "- I
National Institute of Marriage W+E
N

S

DISCLAIMER
Taney County makes every effort to prOOuoe and putlti5h
the most CUfIllnland aceullIte information possible.
Thladata is prov!ded 01S fs° wilhoutwarranty
or any representation of accuracy, timelinesa or
oompleleness. The burden for determining accuracy,
oo"l)leteness, timeliness, merchantability and fttness
for Of the approprtatenus for use rests eolely on the
requellter. The County makn no warranties. express
or lrJl)ied. as to the use otthe Data. Ther. ar. no
impiecl warranties of merd\antabHity or Mness lor
• particular purpose. The requester adUlOWiedges and
aceeplslhe IrritationsoftJ'lt Data, inct.Iding the !act
fhat the 0at.i1 Is dynamic and 15" a constant state 01
mahtenance, correction and update.
MPQ.0!2006

P&Z Regular Meeting Packet

The original county PDF remains the downloadable record artifact and the printable source document.

Rendering PDF preview...